That is good to hear. The one thing that turns me away from the way the industry is how that there is too much turnover. The fact that a network can go from being the best to filing for bankruptcy in less than two years is ridiculous. The fact that massive dollars in this industries are still derived from diet/skin using FTC disapproved landers is frightening. The concept of "affiliate marketing" will always be around since its vital for many businesses to grow and very beneficial since they place all experimental costs on us. But at some point the barrier to enter on the affiliate side and advertising side need to both move much higher that way the industry can mature as a whole.
Right... but there are lots of very simple factors and reasons behind how or why things like that happen. Most of it due to stupidity, no discipline, zero to little business operation skills in the first place, and of course an immaturity level of epic proportions. Business owners, whether they be advertisers or affiliates or even networks many times allow their balls or appetite of shiny/sparkly stuff to overtake their rationale decision making process. Many of them are also either in the psychopath or sociopath slots, so for longterm success and getting away with an obvious edge just won't last. Plus its become an epidemic that the FTC saw a very clear and obvious (we call this low hanging fruit) set of idiots to target. The FTC likes easy wins. Who can blame them, we all like that! I'm glad they came in and shook shit up here.. No one else was doing a fucking thing to them. I'm not a huge fan of regulating our industry either, but I know for a fact that what the FTC came in and did, served a very valid purpose. But we all know it won't stop the next round of guys just doing the same thing over again. Because its too profitable, and many of them truly believe that the risk is worth the reward. So, let them go and shoot themselves in their feet all they like. That entire area alone may have a dent on the bigger networks that didn't diversify correctly in the first place to go in, get burned, and get nuked. That doesn't mean there aren't thousands of other networks that DIDN'T or WON'T take part in the same foolishness and just take over from where the doomed ones were removed.
Networks are just middlemen. There are TONS of them. There always has been, and its likely that there always will be. Because someone, somewhere, needs them to be there. They also make things easier for the most part, many times.
There will also always be affiliates. Its one of the least riskiest positions to be in. While the current affiliate that exists now is leaps and bounds more educated, seasoned, and just privy to all sorts of analytics, tracking, in-depth options on where to put their cash and time into versus discovering new positions to jump into. But it doesn't mean that affiliates today grind harder, day after day more so than the affs of old days. Because they don't. Many of them are actually a lot lazier, slower to react, and oddly enough nowhere near as creative. The more their options and information access increased, the less of an edge they've kept. Not all, but damn certainly most.
Regarding return, the returns in IM are amazing. The other day one of my friends showed me a screenshot of him running over $100k rev in the last 24 hours with 60% roi, course that is amazing. For me to pull over that much roi with that capital in trading would require enormous risk and stress. His biggest stress was losing his advertising account. These past 2 days in trading was considered very good returns due to the move up on a single stock, I pulled in 200% ROI yesterday, and probably 250% today but I know that for most days it will be 15-20% return on a day if I play all my cards right under good market conditions. While the bright affiliate might have underperformed me yesterday and today, but he'll make for it with a consistent 50-100% return for the rest of the week.
I know revenues and gains are nice to look at as they grow... but when I was referring to returns on ROI, I meant pure profit. Invest $1, make $2 back, but count only $1 as profit, since that's what it is, its not $2 to me at all VERSUS not 'sales/rev' of invest $1, make $2 and call the $2 as ROI. Because that's not the same, and its worth noting.
With the stock market, you can have all sorts of overall days where you're 'up'. Very true. But if you want to take the same standard and apply it to aff marketing, you're going to be disappointed. Because the numbers we post, are a win (only counting profits, not sales/rev) every, single, time. Every single campaign. Every single day.
You see, I truly believe that I am not the only one here that can do this. In fact, I know there are guys in the industry that can do the same thing my fund does, and probably do it better. But consistently, over a long period of time, and be able to see risk long before it hits, and adapt, and then leverage it to increase our profits? Fuck no. No one but me (that I know of at least) can make that happen... and it wasn't school that taught me how to do this, its all from being a fucking senior citizen in this game, for so long, and from actually doing it, failing, adapting, getting back into it, and doing it again, over and over and over again, on all of the different sides. This is my calling. Everything before this was training for me. That's how I know you are wrong and how things like this can happen.
Now, if you can find someone like that, but on Wall Street, that doesn't break any rules/laws and can still be as consistently PROFITABLE and CORRECT every single time, for a long time... sign me the fuck up. Because last time I checked, God didn't play the market, only people and computers did.
Look. To tl;dr it... The stock market was never created to give you an edge, therefore, you're chasing a myth and a dream. But our industry always gave us an edge, that's how it was built. FOR affiliates to do the work and get the sales/leads/actions/traffic, and to have the advertisers always be playing catch up. And that's how it works! So how can anyone believe our industry has less of an edge versus the stock market?? Because they are fucking naive. That's the end of it. You're being naive. And that's how you may never be able to get the edge you're chasing in any market, because you just won't accept the reality of how that market was and currently runs.