Off-topic and at the risk of pointing out the obvious, but you do realise you've misspelled "tyrannical" in your logo, right?
Off-topic and at the risk of pointing out the obvious, but you do realise you've misspelled "tyrannical" in your logo, right?
All valid points. I think this one is different because:
1. Selling sign-ups to hook-up dating sites full of pretend women (but no real ones) = $40/month each
2. Selling worthless weight loss products to people desperate to lose weight = $90/month each
3. Selling bullshit government grants packages to people desperate to make money = Don't know how much grants cost... $100 each?
4. Selling payday loans to people who will never be able to pay them back = Same here, I'm not sure how much it costs.. but usually w/ payday loans, you know you're going to pay interest.
5. Selling worthless marketing materials to people desperate to make money online= $20,000$-30,000 each
Like Jon said, buyer beware.
All valid points. I think this one is different because:
1. Selling sign-ups to hook-up dating sites full of pretend women (but no real ones) = $40/month each
2. Selling worthless weight loss products to people desperate to lose weight = $90/month each
3. Selling bullshit government grants packages to people desperate to make money = Don't know how much grants cost... $100 each?
4. Selling payday loans to people who will never be able to pay them back = Same here, I'm not sure how much it costs.. but usually w/ payday loans, you know you're going to pay interest.
5. Selling worthless marketing materials to people desperate to make money online= $20,000$-30,000 each
Like Jon said, buyer beware.
Seems a little weird that you are deciding whether something is moral based on "how badly you're screwing someone over". I'm pretty sure most people decide whether something is moral based on "whether or not you are screwing people over".
All valid points. I think this one is different because:
1. Selling sign-ups to hook-up dating sites full of pretend women (but no real ones) = $40/month each
2. Selling worthless weight loss products to people desperate to lose weight = $90/month each
3. Selling bullshit government grants packages to people desperate to make money = Don't know how much grants cost... $100 each?
4. Selling payday loans to people who will never be able to pay them back = Same here, I'm not sure how much it costs.. but usually w/ payday loans, you know you're going to pay interest.
5. Selling worthless marketing materials to people desperate to make money online= $20,000$-30,000 each
Like Jon said, buyer beware.
All valid points. I think this one is different because:
1. Selling sign-ups to hook-up dating sites full of pretend women (but no real ones) = $40/month each
2. Selling worthless weight loss products to people desperate to lose weight = $90/month each
3. Selling bullshit government grants packages to people desperate to make money = Don't know how much grants cost... $100 each?
4. Selling payday loans to people who will never be able to pay them back = Same here, I'm not sure how much it costs.. but usually w/ payday loans, you know you're going to pay interest.
5. Selling worthless marketing materials to people desperate to make money online= $20,000$-30,000 each
Like Jon said, buyer beware.
Why?I feel dirty just by being on the same marketing platform (the internet) as those guys. I'm going to take a shower, bbl.
Oh, I didn't know selling online is 100% fraudulent. FML, going back to my day job.The term Internet Marketing describes both a particular business model used to sell fraudulent products and services online, and the community or subculture that embraces it.
Don't bother, 95% of the idiots here cant read anyways.I'm not discussing whether things are moral or not, just simply pointing out why they would focus on the guru vertical.
I've always drawn the line with everything I pitch, so far as if I'm not selling something that I believe will genuinely help the customer, I won't sell it.
I've been on WF 5 years, and what constitutes "acceptable marketing" here still confuses the heck out of me. Let me get this straight:
1. Selling sign-ups to hook-up dating sites full of pretend women (but no real ones) = good
2. Selling worthless weight loss products to people desperate to lose weight = good
3. Selling bullshit government grants packages to people desperate to make money = good
4. Selling payday loans to people who will never be able to pay them back = good
5. Selling worthless marketing materials to people desperate to make money online= bad
Am I missing something?
I can't speak for anybody else, but it reminds me of something my Grandma's husband said. "You should never, ever aim to screw somebody over. However, there are a lot of people who are going to screw themselves over no matter what, and there's no harm in being there to make a little money when they do."
Although my personal preference is to avoid promoting things I wouldn't feel comfortable recommending to friends or family, I don't put the offers you mentioned on the same level with the guru crap. With a typical offer, you're putting your ad out there and if people buy into it, that's their choice. We should all have a right to CHOOSE to do idiotic things, and even the most enticing landing page isn't actually FORCING people to buy/signup/etc.
The guru stuff the article is talking about is on a whole different level. They prey on desperate people, specifically because those are the people who are most likely to let their hope overshadow their common sense. If you've ever been at one of those events, you know the audience is typically much older than the typical CPA crowd. You get a lot of blue collar people, retired people, disabled people, etc. A lot of them have been worn down from a lifetime of getting kicked around by their circumstances, and they want desperately to believe:
-That the only reason they aren't wealthy is that they have been doing the wrong thing all these years...
-That they were meant to be millionaires all along...
-That someone has a ready-made system that will help them get there...
-That someday, they'll be able to tell off their boss, brag to their ex about what they passed up, etc.
If it stopped there, it would only be moderately deplorable. But it doesn't. Once someone is in "the system", they bleed them dry and toss them out when they're done. It's not "How would you like to buy this product?...No?...Ok, have a good day." They emphasize the sunk cost and try to make the people think that without this new tool or course or system, they won't be able to make money they've already spent. I remember a lady telling me she was worried that she wouldn't be able to earn back her investment if she didn't buy some specific course - and that even though she couldn't afford it, she didn't want to "lose" the rest of the money she had already put in. Some guy had been calling her on the phone and pressuring her to pull from her retirement savings to buy. Another girl put a $5k course on her credit card without telling her new husband, hoping she could earn it back before he found out. From what she said, that was probably half of her take-home pay that year. There was serious fear and emotional trauma once the up-sells came around.
Last I checked, no major CPA offers were aggressively pursuing their customers the way some of the guru sales forces do. They call on the phone repeatedly. They know the emotional hot buttons, and they know all kinds of fun ways the people can access the money to pay for more courses. They basically do everything they can to get the people to act against their own free will - sympathizing with them about family and friends who "just don't get it" because they're trying to discourage them from emptying their bank accounts.
They hold live events that are not so very different from religious or cult gatherings. They spend a couple of days bombarding you with images of how life COULD be, all while conveniently promoting products and swiping credit cards. Although I can't prove it, my hunch is that they plant people in the audience to help keep the morale up and the money flowing. I will say, though, that I DID know a few legit success stories. They didn't stick around the guru crowds very long.
But anyway, that's the difference as I see it. Not every internet marketing product creator operates the way these guys do, but to compare the gurus to the rest of the affiliate marketing space is to do the entire industry a huge disservice.
And no, Eric, it wasn't Mike Filsaime
For anyone who finds the whole guru thing interesting, I would highly recommend watching the mockumentary "Believe" (and not just because it features one of the guys from Air Supply). It's actually about MLM, but their depiction of the culture and the live events is not too far from the IM gurus. The only difference is that the movie doesn't really show the high-pressure phone sales, but it's still super funny.
Hey now, there is a big difference in selling a rebill product as an affiliate, and selling a dream product thought up that you know is bullshit and you still charge a dream amount for, and then deliver everything but the dream for even more cash.