JP Grunin: From $10,000 to $100,000 in 6 months.

That's completely different.

You can run an ice cream shop better than other ice cream shops. You can differentiate your product. You can do all kinds of things to "beat" those small business statistics.

In a market, your money is the same as anyone else's money. You don't have an edge. If you put $1 into a stock, it's the same as someone else putting $1 into that stock. You can't differentiate your dollar from theirs and make it perform better in the same stock/share.

It's similar to the ice cream shop because you can do lots of things better than a lot of people. It's your ability to analyze the financial information, the overall strategy you are using, you can do due diligence on who is running the company, you can already have an expertise in the industry the company is in, you can choose to buy the stock at a relative low point and sell at a relative high point. You can look at very small companies that the big players won't bother with. You can find or strongly consider information that most ignore. You can wait until the economy is in the middle of a recession to start investing in individual stocks and hold them until the economy recovers and then sell them and invest it back in an index fund. There's like an unlimited amount of things you can do to beat the market.
 


to think you can do it better than multi billion dollar institutions, trading algorithms developed by extremely smart quants and trading desks that dedicate their lives to it is moronic

Like these guys?

Knight Capital Swamped by Glitch Loss - WSJ.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight_Capital_Group

You think some extremely smart and dedicated people can beat the market over the long term right? (I'm pretty sure that's what you believe from reading your posts). Many of these guys run hedge funds or for example with Warren Buffet you can just buy his stock. So if that's the case, then you could just beat the market by giving them all your money to manage.
 
There's like an unlimited amount of things you can do to beat the market.


Well said. Efficient markets is total horseshit, but even with that said I think its incredibly hard to beat indexing.

I know small hedge fund operators who buy up the float of not insignificant companies ($300m, NYSE listed) and then when they've sufficiently reduced the supply they start to "make a market" and trend it up. They'd never admit to it, but that's what they do - There are profits for the taking.

Here's another example of how markets can be predictable.

Here is a model of the stages stocks go through:

StageAnalysis.jpg


Stage 1. Basing pattern (sideways).

Stage 2. Rises above Moving Average line and stays above it for the duration of bull move.

Stage 3. The top, upwards movement slows and forms a sideways trend at the top of the movement.

Stage 4. Decline. Stock moves below Moving Average line and mostly stays beneath it.

Here is a few examples of this model playing out recently:

FEYE

DGU3dhM.png


SPLK

RwnPqVg.png
 
Before going off on the whole "it's rigged" notion, learn about the history of the stock markets and even Wall Street too. It's incredibly fascinating, but will give you the true and real picture of WHY it was set up the way it is now (modern financial markets) versus how it was from the 1800's until just shy of the late 1970's and the push behind the modern touted NASDAQ.

It always has been and always will be a perception market. Just like "investing" is in the minds of most common working people. You and your parents have been sold on a lie, but this lie was meant to keep you somewhat engaged and hopeful. Could you possibly make a profit on the stock market and from investing in long term plays, or with your 401k's and mutual funds and all of those financial products?? "YES WE CAN"!!! That's the beauty of the pitch from the PROFESSIONAL financial 'investment' industry you've manifested into what can best be defined as an investment ethos. Truth is, you're taking the risk, and the guys selling you on it are slowly raping the shit out of you. I'm not judging either side as it is what it is. That's the genius behind all of it, and it really is fucking genius, one should always respect it and take a step back and truly admire it in all it's beauty and evil too. Pure fucking genius.

tlldr - Unless you're licensed to be part of their professional financial community, your graphs, your stats, your opinions and studying means absolutely dick. It was never meant to be predicted, only meant to fool you into thinking you are smarter and luckier than others, therefore you too can be a rich motherfucker because you have the pros on your side.

For my fund, we have this thing called EDGE. Without that, we'd be playing the same fool's game that these other guys play. It's just that simple. Without an edge, you are playing a game of chance with some luck if you win and no luck if you lose.

I'd challenge any stock market pro to beat me in an earnings and/or profit figure contest for a set duration of time. $10k is too low, $1M is probably wiser. Six to twelve months is fine, and have a bonus to make it even more interesting if you can reach certain milestones along the way. They would never beat me because their edge is typically illegal.. whereas my edge isn't. Hell, I'd even say, let them play their stock markets and I'll play on just the bitcoin market. Any takers? Msg me.

(Grunin, you may want to pay attention, noob.)



Woah you're amazing! When can I join your private trading forum and give you my money?!?
 
Of course there are inefficiencies in the market.

Take a look at a company like Renaissance Technologies. They are clearly taking advantage of market inefficiencies. However...
Renaissance employs some with non-financial backgrounds, including mathematicians, physicists, astrophysicists and statisticians. About a third of the 275 employees at the East Setauket office have Ph.Ds.

If there are market inefficiencies that are so easy to spot that mgrunin can write simple rules for buys and sells, those gaps would already be closed by bigger trading firms within milliseconds and the inefficiency would be gone.

I'm not saying there aren't market inefficiencies, but mgrunin certainly isn't taking advantage of them.
 
Most of you guys can barely handle a Google update now you're all pretending to be Paul Tudor Jones?

SMH
 
He's not coming back...


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZ3cLJ7FGq4"]Point Break - Final Wave ?? - YouTube[/ame]



not while this thread is on page 1
 
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JzBpTT-vqg&list=UUDx_BHg6blLqXxfFkkiPRog"]Automated Stategy Journal: Day 1 - YouTube[/ame]
 
Only down $539 in fake money with the automated system. New 10k automated challenge is on.
 
To fatalerror, tavin, and others who are unsure, MGrunin is not playing with his parents' money.

He made his first million advertising a frogger game on facebook back in 2010.

Made some more doing other AM stuff, then he started/learned options trading ~mid 2011. He made between 500k to 700k in the past 12 months, so he upgraded from the BMW to the R8, and also bought a house in Queens.

Source: I know someone who is very close to him.

Just wanted to clear that up. The 10k isnt much.
 
To fatalerror, tavin, and others who are unsure, MGrunin is not playing with his parents' money.

He made his first million advertising a frogger game on facebook back in 2010.

Made some more doing other AM stuff, then he started/learned options trading ~mid 2011. He made between 500k to 700k in the past 12 months, so he upgraded from the BMW to the R8, and also bought a house in Queens.

Source: I know someone who is very close to him.

Just wanted to clear that up. The 10k isnt much.

Qbv8Ki4.gif
 
Like these guys?

Knight Capital Swamped by Glitch Loss - WSJ.com
Knight Capital Group - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You think some extremely smart and dedicated people can beat the market over the long term right? (I'm pretty sure that's what you believe from reading your posts). Many of these guys run hedge funds or for example with Warren Buffet you can just buy his stock. So if that's the case, then you could just beat the market by giving them all your money to manage.

Yes, I think groups of very intelligent people can beat the market. They're not perfectly efficient by any means.

All I'm saying is that most people aren't qualified to spot market inefficiencies, especially when they're acting alone.

I'm not talking about full time traders at institutions here, or funds who have huge teams of people that develop algorithmic trading software.

I'm talking about the average reader of this thread, who says "oh, Apple is a good company, I think they're undervalued" and chucks 10% of their cash into the stock.

By doing that, you're saying "I know better than Goldman Sachs, Warren Buffet, thousands of algorithmic traders, yada yada". Because they're the guys with the money that price the stocks. Why are you in a better position to value that stock than they are? How can you possibly value it in a better way, faster?

Algorithmic/ultra high frequency trading is decimating the advantage most individual traders had (i.e. the "Goldman Sachs can't invest in ABC because if they put $1bn in it, it would change the price"), because they can trade in smaller numbers and still be profitable, due to the sheer volume of trades their automated software can make every second. You can be in and out of thousands of stocks making points here there and everywhere on $10k investments and make billions over a year.
 
i think hedge fund managers also succumb to individual investors emotions though.
even though they know better.
if your hf buys company a it returns 15% and they know its a good company still, they will trade it anyway because thats what they get paid for.
if they don't and just hold stock A B and C and they just keep going up by themselves people will wonder why they need hedge fund managers (because they wouldn't have found a, b and c)

I remember couple of years back I read somewhere people criticizing buffett too, more and more, because he had all that cash and made no trades at berkshire. right before the down in 2008.
I think he caved too and went in before the collapse with railroads but one should have to research that if I remember that right.
 
I work with a guy who has supported his family for about 15 years trading on the Canadian markets and junior north american markets.

Pretty well all resource stuff

I will tell you how he does it: A huge number of contacts, the willingness to do research, and high emotional IQ.

For example, lots of trailing stops and a completely ruthless ability to shoot the dogs.

Now when I say "willingness to do research," I mean exactly that. How many of you guys have read evey damn paragraph of a 30 page company report?

Yeah, zero. I thought so.

It's not a super-high IQ that makes you money, but a fanatically high attention to detail and time and practice.

You guys drop $20k on a stock and you don't even know the earnings of the last quarter? And then when you lose money, you say the market is rigged?

Whatever.
 
Cock keeps posting these wrestling gifs. On a related note, WWE stock lost 40% on Friday and the put options went gangbusters. Some put options were up 50x in that day alone. Amazing