This happened in April this year already. It is not a ban but is as effective as a ban. To sell a herb, the vendor now needs go through alot of protocols and pay large sums to pay for a license application. They just can't afford it.
Cure For HIV and Cancer
- Thread starter SeoReborn
- Start date
This happened in April this year already. It is not a ban but is as effective as a ban. To sell a herb, the vendor now needs go through alot of protocols and pay large sums to pay for a license application. They just can't afford it.
Hey guys, we cured AIDS and cancer! Here's how you can build your own! http://www.sharinghealth.com/pdfs/buildyourown.pdf
This device is not FDA approved, so it is mandatory they include such a statement.
Of course correlation does not imply causation. However correlation mean it warrants investigation as it could be a variable in the cause. In terms of that guy's mother in law, she was diagnosed and then eliminated the cancer in 7 days. And the only treatment she had was using that device for 3 days. This implies that particular variable should be looked.
If you have such a superiority complex as to negative rep me with "you are soooo retarded, it is hard to believe you are real", at least back yourself up with enough brain cells to do a simple search. Here's one article
Viruses May Cause More Cancer than Previously Thought | LiveScience
I agree that a FAIR IMPARTIAL double blind study with clinical trials would be ideal. However who is going to provide the funding? When you find time, watch the video in the other thread 'cancer is serious business' - it documents how the corrupt FDA imposes protocols to ensure the failure of treatments that may eat into the big pharma's pockets. Science and scientific method is not wrong or corrupt, people are. God knows how many alternative treatments have been dismissed after manipulation of clinical data and procedures, Also clinical trials/double blind studies is an attempt to verify treatment, they do not make a treatment work. A treatment does not need a clinical trial for it to work.
Do you realize how bad chemo is? I believe i have already linked you to some references in the other thread.
I'm complimented with your statement (for which you have stated in the past also). You who goes along with whatever the mainstream tells you should find my posts bullshit. For that I thank you.
All i can say is chemotheraphy kept my Dad alive for 5 years after he was diagnosted with metatastic cancer. Same oncologist helped my wife with breast cancer. I'm now being screened for colon cancer.
Guess who I'm going to see next ?
domnt knwo if that works but IF IT DID, they wouldnt let it live anyways.
u people are stupid if u think gov or any health copro would let such thing go live.
u people are stupid if u think gov or any health copro would let such thing go live.
Yeah, better just let all the quacks sell what the fuck they want without it being clinically tested.
My pleasure.
You didn't contradict me. I said cancer is not a virus, fungi, parasite or bacteria. It isn't. The fact that some viruses and bacteria cause cancer does not mean that they are cancer. Your argument is a non sequitur.
And yes, I called you a retard, you are being a retard.
if this can cure why not sell this item...
There is no reason of keeping this a secret if this can help greater mankind. Unless someone or somebody is taking advantage of it.
There is no reason of keeping this a secret if this can help greater mankind. Unless someone or somebody is taking advantage of it.
Apparently they suppressed the video too.
heading to closet for my tinfoil hat.
http://youtu.be/G7P4iFg048k Chris Rock ""Ain't no money in the cure"
heading to closet for my tinfoil hat.
http://youtu.be/G7P4iFg048k Chris Rock ""Ain't no money in the cure"
Last edited:
As I understand it, the vendor can sell the substance but can't make untested/unverified claims about what it does. Taking all emotion and conspiracy theories out of the equation, that sounds sensible doesn't it?
I don't think anyone would say that current clinical trial system is perfect, but having worked in scientific research for a short time I can honestly say that I've never met a scientist who's motivated by money. I'm not saying that pressure isn't applied to research groups by the people funding them in certain cases, but it's not the major problem that a lot of people imagine it to be.
What's sad is that some people become so obsessed by conspiracy theories and stories of doctor negligence that they end up trusting sellers of alternative medicine (who are effectively allowed to say whatever they want without any sort of testing other than anecdotal evidence) instead of scientific based medicine. I've personally known several examples of this and it doesn't end well most of the time....
lol I can't tell you if works or not, I don't have cancer, but I own all four devices... bought them long ago when curious. Used them a few times.... the brain tuner is cool if you want to have lucid dreams by using it at the wrong time of day.
There's no affiliate program, I've been asking for years. Sota instruments sells the equipment.
The guy is dead. The "Beck Manual" leaves something to be desired. However, if the worst thing that happens from it is the ability to create a positive belief/change in people via placebo effect, I think that's great.
There's no affiliate program, I've been asking for years. Sota instruments sells the equipment.
The guy is dead. The "Beck Manual" leaves something to be desired. However, if the worst thing that happens from it is the ability to create a positive belief/change in people via placebo effect, I think that's great.
