No, I am saying the accusations of mal intent, explicit and implicit, are bullshit. When people challenge character, why is it wrong to make a character statement?Are you saying that since erect is a good person we should not be allowed to call him out if he does something wrong or makes a mistake?
That's depressing given how hard you work at reading comprehension.Because that's how I read your post.
This is a great post.You missed my point. There'd be no lack of "venture capitalists" willing to stake someone the $100 for a thread if they could prove (by giving a free review copy that actually worked) that their shit worked. There could even be a sticky thread in BST for it for fish and fishermen to congregate.
Jazzy names like Bulk Link Penetrator 2.1 (™. bishes) are cool and all but the reason people spend money is for results. Guys who have complete confidence in what they're bringing to the table would gladly run a free review copy for a chance to grab the hundred bucks. And if it was $100/month like Guerilla suggested, if their service was quality, they'd have no problem making that nut hereafter.
No, I am saying the accusations of mal intent, explicit and implicit, are bullshit. When people challenge character, why is it wrong to make a character statement?
Doing something wrong and making a mistake aren't the same thing.
That's depressing given how hard you work at reading comprehension.
And in this case, I think most people in this thread think that when erect created a new account for a vendor and censored any mention of the old account, he both made a mistake and did something wrong (they may not be the same thing, but they certainly aren't mutually exclusive).No, I am saying the accusations of mal intent, explicit and implicit, are bullshit. When people challenge character, why is it wrong to make a character statement?
Doing something wrong and making a mistake aren't the same thing.
And in this case, I think most people in this thread think that when erect created a new account for a vendor and censored any mention of the old account, he both made a mistake and did something wrong (they may not be the same thing, but they certainly aren't mutually exclusive).
This thread is about the censoring of posts in an effort to hide a Wickedfire members past actions. I'm still not sure what erect's great personality has to do with that. Especially considering both eliquid and mgtarheels have repeatedly stated that they have no problem with erect besides the actions that are being discussed.
Fuck that.
The seller whoever it was had a previous account that got banned. Registered a new account, said he would abide by the forum rules and actually came clean.
Erect said OK, cool.
Two competitors came posting in the thread stating the obvious, subsequently thrashing it. (against forum rules btw)
Erect explained in PM and deleted their posts.
Eliquid opened this thread crying conspiracy and claim that Erect receives "kick-backs" from it.
Everybody shit in their own hands now!
Whats even more funny you fuck-tard is that you got 0% of the facts right.
1. No one ever said the seller had a banned account - fuck you #1
2. No one came into his thread and bashed it or threadshat it for Erect to delete it - fuck you #2
3. I never once stated Erect got a kickback from it, I questioned him - fuck you #3
How about you get the facts straight next time? Maybe your too busy with your next fake adsense network case study so you can hock more guru products ...
Maybe your too busy with your next fake adsense network case study so you can hock more guru products so you can get back into dailyhustle ...
Im black from the waist down... you make me laugh son
funny, id like for you to point out where I have ever thread crushed a competitor. Please do this. DO. IT. RIGHT. NOW
You for sure never read my statement in the thread. Please go back and read plz, and this time put on your big boy glasses. I gave Jon the proof that I have access to and even another member backed it up. Plus, Erect has not denied any of it. You dont even know who the seller is, so any arguement you have is for sure 100% BS.
I thought we were all being polite about the implausible adsense screenshots.
I thought we were all being polite about the implausible adsense screenshots.
Must.. not.. get.. sucked into drama. fuck
Where's the proof that Erect acted in self-interest and has received "kick-backs" from sellers he alledgedly defended?
All you did when asked for proof was argue semantics and say something like "oh wait I didn't claim/insinuate that".
So are you getting kickback from this deal as well?