WTF is up with the recent censorship here at WF?

Funny thing is that I think even a 10$ (or even 5$) per thread would dissuade most of the shitty providers.

It puts up a psychological barrier more than a financial one.
(Think the coin you put into a shopping cart)

::emp::
 


Are you saying that since erect is a good person we should not be allowed to call him out if he does something wrong or makes a mistake?
No, I am saying the accusations of mal intent, explicit and implicit, are bullshit. When people challenge character, why is it wrong to make a character statement?

Doing something wrong and making a mistake aren't the same thing.

Because that's how I read your post.
That's depressing given how hard you work at reading comprehension.
 
You missed my point. There'd be no lack of "venture capitalists" willing to stake someone the $100 for a thread if they could prove (by giving a free review copy that actually worked) that their shit worked. There could even be a sticky thread in BST for it for fish and fishermen to congregate.

Jazzy names like Bulk Link Penetrator 2.1 (™. bishes) are cool and all but the reason people spend money is for results. Guys who have complete confidence in what they're bringing to the table would gladly run a free review copy for a chance to grab the hundred bucks. And if it was $100/month like Guerilla suggested, if their service was quality, they'd have no problem making that nut hereafter.
This is a great post.

The cost means vendors have to be serious about participating. They also have to be serious about turning a profit in order to make some money and pay the listing fee. It keeps the deadweight out.

I can't see how anyone likes the current SBT with hundreds of new services a month, most of which will go nowhere, crowding out the truly solid services and providers.
 
No, I am saying the accusations of mal intent, explicit and implicit, are bullshit. When people challenge character, why is it wrong to make a character statement?

Doing something wrong and making a mistake aren't the same thing.


That's depressing given how hard you work at reading comprehension.


You call it mal intent, but I feel that when it comes to SBT it's more about business than anything else. This isn't so much about character as much as it's about a questionable judgement call. Call it what you want, the fact remains that some people didn't like what took place, and everyone had their own opinion on the severity of the situation.

At least we have the ability to question things, and I hope it stays that way.
 
Well at least this forum is not like WaFo. They just deleted this.

SIxim.png
 
No, I am saying the accusations of mal intent, explicit and implicit, are bullshit. When people challenge character, why is it wrong to make a character statement?

Doing something wrong and making a mistake aren't the same thing.
And in this case, I think most people in this thread think that when erect created a new account for a vendor and censored any mention of the old account, he both made a mistake and did something wrong (they may not be the same thing, but they certainly aren't mutually exclusive).

This thread is about the censoring of posts in an effort to hide a Wickedfire members past actions. I'm still not sure what erect's great personality has to do with that. Especially considering both eliquid and mgtarheels have repeatedly stated that they have no problem with erect besides the actions that are being discussed.
 
And in this case, I think most people in this thread think that when erect created a new account for a vendor and censored any mention of the old account, he both made a mistake and did something wrong (they may not be the same thing, but they certainly aren't mutually exclusive).

This thread is about the censoring of posts in an effort to hide a Wickedfire members past actions. I'm still not sure what erect's great personality has to do with that. Especially considering both eliquid and mgtarheels have repeatedly stated that they have no problem with erect besides the actions that are being discussed.

Fuck that.

The seller whoever it was had a previous account that got banned. Registered a new account, said he would abide by the forum rules and actually came clean.

Erect said OK, cool.

Two competitors came posting in the thread stating the obvious, subsequently thrashing it. (against forum rules btw)

Erect explained in PM and deleted their posts.

Eliquid opened this thread crying conspiracy and claim that Erect receives "kick-backs" from it.

Everybody shit in their own hands now!
 
Fuck that.

The seller whoever it was had a previous account that got banned. Registered a new account, said he would abide by the forum rules and actually came clean.

Erect said OK, cool.

Two competitors came posting in the thread stating the obvious, subsequently thrashing it. (against forum rules btw)

Erect explained in PM and deleted their posts.

Eliquid opened this thread crying conspiracy and claim that Erect receives "kick-backs" from it.

Everybody shit in their own hands now!


Whats even more funny you fuck-tard is that you got 0% of the facts right.

1. No one ever said the seller had a banned account - fuck you #1
2. No one came into his thread and bashed it or threadshat it for Erect to delete it - fuck you #2
3. I never once stated Erect got a kickback from it, I questioned him - fuck you #3

How about you get the facts straight next time? Maybe your too busy with your next fake adsense network case study so you can hock more guru products so you can get back into dailyhustle ...
 
Whats even more funny you fuck-tard is that you got 0% of the facts right.

1. No one ever said the seller had a banned account - fuck you #1
2. No one came into his thread and bashed it or threadshat it for Erect to delete it - fuck you #2
3. I never once stated Erect got a kickback from it, I questioned him - fuck you #3

How about you get the facts straight next time? Maybe your too busy with your next fake adsense network case study so you can hock more guru products ...

Oh wait, I thought you said you ain't coming back here. Fuck you #1.

And there goes another claim from Mr. Eliquid with no proof to back it up. Remember when you call Erect out on shit he never did and presented ZERO proof even when Jon explicitly asked for it? That just happened just now.

Don't eat the shit you spit if you can't swallow it.

You're known for thread-crushing competitors, and karma has got you back bitch.

Go drip some more blog comments "nigga". You ain't even black.
 
Im black from the waist down... you make me laugh son

funny, id like for you to point out where I have ever thread crushed a competitor. Please do this. DO. IT. RIGHT. NOW

You for sure never read my statement in the thread. Please go back and read plz, and this time put on your big boy glasses. I gave Jon the proof that I have access to and even another member backed it up. Plus, Erect has not denied any of it. You dont even know who the seller is, so any arguement you have is for sure 100% BS.
 
Im black from the waist down... you make me laugh son

funny, id like for you to point out where I have ever thread crushed a competitor. Please do this. DO. IT. RIGHT. NOW

You for sure never read my statement in the thread. Please go back and read plz, and this time put on your big boy glasses. I gave Jon the proof that I have access to and even another member backed it up. Plus, Erect has not denied any of it. You dont even know who the seller is, so any arguement you have is for sure 100% BS.

Must.. not.. get.. sucked into drama. fuck

Where's the proof that Erect acted in self-interest and has received "kick-backs" from sellers he alledgedly defended?

All you did when asked for proof was argue semantics and say something like "oh wait I didn't claim/insinuate that".

and regarding DailyHustle, wasn't kicked out, I asked to leave because it wasn't a good fit for me, go verify this with Lord_b.

I thought we were all being polite about the implausible adsense screenshots.

I even went to the extent of showing video proof of me logging into the adsense account eventhough if was unnecessary. If you don't buy that, there's really nothing else I can do without outing my sites but a few members (lord_b, guerilla) have looked at the sites I own (most ranking first page) and can verify the 100 DFB accounts I purchased for linkbuilding.
 
Must.. not.. get.. sucked into drama. fuck

Where's the proof that Erect acted in self-interest and has received "kick-backs" from sellers he alledgedly defended?

All you did when asked for proof was argue semantics and say something like "oh wait I didn't claim/insinuate that".

*SIGH* there is no winning with idiots.

Again, I never said one time that Erect did get a kickback.

Like you failed to prove I trashed competitor threads, I again ask you to PLZ PROVE WHERE I SAID ERECT GOT A KICKBACK FROM THIS. All you will find is me questioning it.

PLEASE. DO. IT. NOW.
 
Just because I can't get to sleep I opened up WF and got down this shithole thread. Man, you guys got way too much time on your hand...

eliquid - bro, shit happens. I don't have any incentive to go to BST and moderate all the petty disputes out there. I am not even active in BST Yet I get so mannnnnnny PMs from Idiots asking me to do stuff for them. Ugh, sorry I don't have time.

But sometimes I do tend to jump into and fix stuff when I feel the urge for it. The judgement calls are not always right in retrospect... but then who gives a fuck. Things tend to work out.

Jon - Pay Per Thread or Monthly Payment to become a qualified service provider.

Guerilla - I love you man, but you spend too much time writing novels! Been practicing 2000 word homepage content writing? ;)

@All: Go home bros, nothing to see here. Move On. If you are commenting anything else but TL;DR you guys have way too much time on your hand and will stay peasants.