@-joe- | You're absolutely right, we actually forgot about that. It's an easy fix I think if I remember chatting to our engineering team. I'll get on them about that today! The reason it displays that is because that is the keyword Google returns to us, so it's not really a bug it's just an actual keyword from Google that meets your criteria (means people search for xxxx.com) and then the tool tries to run xxxx.com with all TLD's so it'd be xxxx.com.com, xxxx.com.net, etc... make sense? Definitely something we can filter out! Apologies for that.
@Big_Joe | It should filter the .ORG's correctly about 98% of the time. We honestly pay for that data and the .ORG data is never 100%, we have no idea why, it's an issue with the whois service and server, we scrape it and pay for it and it's still inconsistent, it has something to do with that .ORG's are managed by a separate entity and it's just not as good data as com/net/etc... If too many requests are made in a row it'll show false positives or negative, it's dumb. It should work 98% of the time flawlessly though! Sorry about that! We're working on a new data source for a later release but no firm answers yet.
@alc | Same response as -joe- above, we'll work on that!
I apologize for these little details that are annoying. We sometimes get so focused on conceptual and future releases we forget these little things that annoy our users! Our deepest apologies.
I hope everyone is happy so far! Great stuff coming!
Thanks for being a loyal customer,
David
@Big_Joe | It should filter the .ORG's correctly about 98% of the time. We honestly pay for that data and the .ORG data is never 100%, we have no idea why, it's an issue with the whois service and server, we scrape it and pay for it and it's still inconsistent, it has something to do with that .ORG's are managed by a separate entity and it's just not as good data as com/net/etc... If too many requests are made in a row it'll show false positives or negative, it's dumb. It should work 98% of the time flawlessly though! Sorry about that! We're working on a new data source for a later release but no firm answers yet.
@alc | Same response as -joe- above, we'll work on that!
I apologize for these little details that are annoying. We sometimes get so focused on conceptual and future releases we forget these little things that annoy our users! Our deepest apologies.
I hope everyone is happy so far! Great stuff coming!
Thanks for being a loyal customer,
David