This alpha/beta labeling is getting annoying because of how general it is, there are way too many variables to polarize guys like that. Besides, the definitions are too loose- are we talking about the ability to get girls or personality traits? Either way, you can't just put every guy into one of the two camps- most guys don't wholly fit either definition.
I've seen many effective methods of catching poon in action, the "cold macho no-shit-from-anybody beef jerky chewing gun collecting bench pressing collar popping sports watching female exploiting" approach certainly works, but that's not everybody's style, and there is a vast pool of girls who see right through that shit and consider guys like that obnoxious.
Sometimes you have to be cunning, sometimes you have to act like a pussy to get pussy. It's not as black and white as you think, a good 'nice guy' or even a well-played 'mysterious guy' routine can get you laid like a motherfucker, but you need to have good social skills to pull it off. You don't need social grace to appear 'alpha' to people, you just have to act entitled and better than everyone else. You have to pump up your ego to fit the 'alpha' bill. Like I said, that's not some people's style.
There's plenty of room for the quiet and reserved thinker in the world of poon, but not for the coward (mostly). I encourage you to rethink what you mean by beta/alpha, their current use is far too blanketed to mean much.
And as far as I'm concerned, the OP of
this thread doesn't know shit about human behavior, he sounds like Vin Diesel teaching a philosophy class.