leave popeye alone, he's much too busy rackin' up some more muzzie kills
He'll be back when his bloodlust has been quenched
He'll be back when his bloodlust has been quenched
I was just responding to that hilarious Alinsky-esq statement.
Saul Alinsky
His organizing skills were focused on improving the living conditions of poor communities across North America. In the 1950s, he began turning his attention to improving conditions of the African-American ghettos, beginning with Chicago's and later traveling to other ghettos in California, Michigan, New York City, and a dozen other "trouble spots". His ideas were later adapted by some US college students and other young organizers in the late 1960s and formed part of their strategies for organizing on campus and beyond.[2] Time magazine once wrote that "American democracy is being altered by Alinsky's ideas," and conservative author William F. Buckley said he was "very close to being an organizational genius.
Not being from the US allows me to read through these posts somewhat impartially. One thing I notice across just about all of them - and even the US media in general - is that the robotic agreement comes from both sides of the political spectrum.Is it me or has the number of libtards on this board increased? Now they just jerk each other off and think their robotic agreement actually means something.
Not being from the US allows me to read through these posts somewhat impartially. One thing I notice across just about all of them - and even the US media in general - is that the robotic agreement comes from both sides of the political spectrum.
I even notice that well presented ideas from both sides often get diluted by unnecessary characterisations and name calling. Do those of you who participate in that manner actually hope to convince anyone that your argument is more sound or are you just chest thumping?
Whatever happened to proper debate?
Why would Popeye return to dignify comments made by useful idiots? He said his piece and he's out. I'd do the same thing.
who devised immoral tactics for gaining power. You know... Obama's teacher.
Slightly OT, but there is one other thing you might be able to notice which most Americans just don't get.Not being from the US allows me to read through these posts somewhat impartially.
Slightly OT, but there is one other thing you might be able to notice which most Americans just don't get.
Every Democrat in the US is convinced that the Republican politicians are lying cheating money-grabbing manipulative scumbags that don't care about people's lives but only cater to special interest groups.
Every Republican in the US is convinced that the Democrat politicians are lying cheating money-grabbing manipulative scumbags that don't care about people's lives but only cater to special interest groups.
But once you start talking about the foreign policy, then in one instant, all those Republican and Democrat leaders (the lying cheating money-grabbing manipulative scumbags that don't care about people's lives but only cater to special interest groups) turn into decent human beings. And when they act on the world arena on behalf of the US as a whole, they never do anything "bad." It's always someone else's fault for "starting it".
You can see the traces of this fallacy in pretty much every conversation with an American about world affairs. They would spew crap about the "other party" endlessly, but would completely refuse to understand that the same US Government fucks people over far away from the US Soil, and does it with a lot more brutality.
It's as if the American politicians are only "evil" when dealing with domestic issues that affect their own citizens. But once those same politicians make decisions that affect people elsewhere, then all "bad" is done strictly out of necessity, and never by choice or for profit.
Unlike a lot of sheep, I won't thank an anti-American solider for his "service" to the country. If you think being a patriotic American is about joining up to go kill people, you don't know a fucking thing about being a ( free, liberty-loving) American.
These foreigners are convinced that the US is behind all of their problems. But they readily and willingly collect billions of dollars in US aid.
Who doesn't see this fallacy?
![]()
political internet arguments = fail
tits = win
Which foreigners? Do you think the US sends aid to every single country out there?These foreigners are convinced that the US is behind all of their problems. But they readily and willingly collect billions of dollars in US aid.
The real fallacy here is the fact that you failed to either state your agreement with my point or to post a logical rebuttal. Instead, you just went on a tangent. But that's another matter altogether.Who doesn't see this fallacy?
why would he lie about being in the military? anyone who questions it or demands credentials is just a trolling douchebag