Who Else is Getting REAL Tired of the US Gov't?

I am Barry Hussein Obama and I promise to work directly with aojon to address these matters in the coming days. Thank you everyone for all your feedback.
 


I bet Obama is sitting in his office right now and he's thinking "HA HA, those mother fuckers think I'm actually black." Watch the Obama deception, it's free on Google video.
 
The whole healthcare thing is starting to scare me, especially after what Governor Quitter (oh, sorry, Palin) recently said (on Facebook...): Obama's health care plan is evil: Palin - Yahoo!7 News

Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called President Barack Obama's health plan "downright evil" on Friday in her first online comments since leaving office.
She said in a Facebook posting that he would create a "death panel" that would deny care to the neediest Americans.
"The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their 'level of productivity in society', whether they are worthy of health care," the former Republican vice-presidential candidate wrote.
I love nutjob conspiracy theories.
 
AMT was my nightmare last year. Those of you saying that paying 50% in taxes means you have a bad accountant obviously haven't been deep into the top tax bracket before... and that's only FEDERAL. I still had to pay roughly 8% state. AMT will MASSACRE your deductions. I got so fucked last year. Here are the deductions I lost due to AMT just off the top of my head.

Child deduction
Home loan interest (almost $20k)
Personal Property tax
Medical expenses
Cannot take itemized deductions for state
Federal itemized deductions CRIPPLED (lost a HUGE %... est 70% lost)

When all was said and done, I ended up paying roughly 40% tax to the fed and state.

Then theres sales tax...property tax... licence/title fees... 50% is reality.
 
How about disallowing recissions entirely? What if you had cancer, or some other awful, chronic disease, and you went to your insurance company and told them of it very honestly and got your coverage with qualifiers? So sorry, so sad, we can't cover your scary disease, Mr. xmcp123. So you'd have to pony up the insurance fee, in addition to anything related to the cancer which isn't covered. And if it makes you bankrupt and homeless, that's free enterprise. The insurance company shouldn't have to cover that, it's bad for business and the government allows it. That's fair, no?
I didn't abandon the point at all; in fact, it speaks for itself. Health insurance costs are like a black hole sucking away the nation's wealth. Look at your premium; I don't have to argue the point.

I can't stay in this thread because I have to go to work and pay for things. Rant on, wingnuts.

I have one question for you. Why are medical costs today so high in proportion to the average income? Could it possibly be due to inflation? Could it possibly be due to the multitude of government intervention in this country - artifically engineering prices? Could high insurance costs possibly be due to the government granting large insurance and pharma legal monopolies on drug production and on health care? Maybe if you read any bit of your adversary's arguments you'd realize that his solutions are much more sensible than your idea of allowing the government complete control over what companies we are to deal with. This philosophy that you hold that everyone is entitled to healthcare is clearly bogus. In an advanced civilization, the standard of living is high and costs go down, not inflate. National healthcare is a license to inflate the money supply at whim, and a license to arbitrarily dictate prices in every health care industry. What becomes an objective measure of prices if not the free market? What then becomes an objective measure of the importance of covering the cost of one disease over another? It's completely antithetical to try and lower prices by taking more money from the producers of a country- and spending it covering everyone and their mother at the expense of a 50%+ tax rate. You want to know why health care costs are unproportionately high? In part it is because the government has strangled our producers to the point of making nothing profitable but the health care industry, for the biggest players. If you read some Ayn Rand, you'll see how your emotional argument for collectivism is one that is self destructing. You're not looking at any consequences of your statements, and you certaintly are not arguing with logic.

And to the rest of you wickedfire guys that post meaningless sentences as if you are totally unaffected by the issue or think you are powerless in the face of thousands of power hungry dwarves - guys your dad's age that aspire not to steal for a living, I suggest you attack any form of further government intervention with your life, because that's what is on the line. The government has already found out that tax receipts decline at higher tax rates - their own receipts tell them that- it is their philosophy of obtaining the most centralized power possible by destroying the producers and making alms with the non producers that they live by. They live by the power to print as much money as wanted - and counterfeit the producers of society. Your jugular is an object of their dictatorship - they understand it, and it's time you do too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: guerilla
This thread is now about how big your E-penis is and how many hundred dollar bills you can piss out your dick hole.
 
Instead of arguing non-stop. You should see that there is a large polarization between groups on healthcare. Which means go create quizzes about Obama's death panel and what Sarah Palin said about her kid intertwined with zip and CPA offers. Cha fucking ching.
 
So , now that everyone has complained, what are you going to do about it? Move out of the country?
maybe. i'd rather pay 40-50% taxes in a country that's moving forward instead of backward and have those taxes benefit me in some way other than paying for bums, bullets and reduction of my rights/privacy.
 
Donate to campaigns such as Rand Paul's Senate campaign and others.

Rand Paul 2010 | U.S. Senate|


Keeping him in the Senate is fine but he doesn't have the wide appeal to make a serious go at 2012. Don't waste your time and vote in '12 for Paul. Voting for him in a presidential election is just taking votes away from the challenger of the marxist, racist Obama.
 
Keeping him in the Senate is fine but he doesn't have the wide appeal to make a serious go at 2012. Don't waste your time and vote in '12 for Paul. Voting for him in a presidential election is just taking votes away from the challenger of the marxist, racist Obama.

How do you keep someone in the Senate who has never been a Senator?