Trump's Revenge

[guerilla]

So there is a theory that a six year old sat before a US consular officer, convinced them that they had a full understanding of what it means to renounce citizenship and all that, the officer's supervisors also approved of this, and none of this was recorded on public record?

Because that's the process all 6 year olds go through to obtain their citizenship in the first place, amirite?

Obviously his guardians would have acted on his behalf. We're also talking about an era pre-computer, in a foreign backwater.

Unfortunately, everyone is obsessed with Obama's citizenship, instead they should be asking, "Why do we need a President in the first place?"

 

[Moxie]

Because that's the process all 6 year olds go through to obtain their citizenship in the first place, amirite?

derp

Obviously his guardians would have acted on his behalf.

Uh no, as I already pointed out, guardians cannot renounce US citizenship and this goes back before Obama's time. This is a major breakdown point for this particular "theory", but it's a good example of the type of thing that agenda-driven "journalists" sometimes ignore.

We're also talking about an era pre-computer, in a foreign backwater.

6 year old Obama being made King of The North Pole or Grand Imperial Starchild of Mars would not have changed a US citizenship.

 

[Crisis]

Yeah, really retarded. I must be completely brain dead, in fact.

For once, I absolutely, completely and 100% agree with your opinion on this matter.

 

[barman]

For once, I absolutely, completely and 100% agree with your opinion on this matter.

 

[-joe-]

Someone or some branch within the government could be hiding their purpose from the rest of the government. More likely though it would be external, such as the ppl we call "the powers that be." You know, the ppl that really run the world, as George Carlin said... Usually bank & corporate CEOs... Ppl who use presidents as their puppets. Perhaps having a socialist/communist president is something that would help out their income streams? Who knows... Just don't be so quick to write it off... If you can't even define the actual power structure, how can you be so sure you know what they want?

I think that's unlikely, in a country of 314 million people, I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to find a friend/relative of someone in Bilderberg or a socialist. If it is a cover-up, I think the most likely explanation is "whoops, he used a fake birth certificate and trail of events and we didn't spot it, we'll look like jackasses, lose our jobs, and leave the country without a president if we admit it".

Not that I have any opinions on where Obama's from, nor do I give a flying fuck if he's from Australia/Kenya/Antarctica. I think *shock, horror* some parts of the constitution are outdated. For example, the original clauses allowing slavery.

 

[barry06]

 

[csnreyes]

Obama 2012

This

 

[netbert]

Trump didn't make fuck tons of money you stupid fuck. He destroyed his father's business and couldn't even keep a casino profitable. How thick is that fucking skull of yours?

Trump is doing okay now, but he's making money purely out of licensing his name out and being a loudmouth attention whore on TV. You don't need to be a genius to do that. You simply need to whore out the family name that your Daddy worked hard to build.

This has been pointed out already and you still don't get it, so it doesn't sound like you're very bright.

Exactly. When you make fuck-tons of money, you don't team up with other guru frauds:

 

[barman]

http://mashable.com/2012/11/06/trump-reacts-to-election/

 

[bodiddley]

Anyone who has even the slightest of doubts that Obama isn't a citizen of the US is fucking retarded. What incentive would the government have to let that slip through? Do you not think he might have had, ya know, a background check done before entering the race?

Also, Donald Trump is a fucking idiot and doesn't deserve any attention.

In terms of incentive, think of it this way - could there have possibly been a better candidate to promise "hope and change" (while keeping the status quo) than Obama in 2008?

As we've seen with yesterday's result, a large percent of the voters vote on emotion and not logic. With the appeal this guy has to women, minorities, and the lazy people will vote for him no matter what. Just as his fanbase is in love with him, the elites etc. are in love with the blind devotion of his following.

And yes Trump is an idiot and attention whore, but who cares? It's the evidence that deserves attention, not him.

 

[ck256]

In terms of incentive, think of it this way - could there have possibly been a better candidate to promise "hope and change" (while keeping the status quo) than Obama in 2008?

As we've seen with yesterday's result, a large percent of the voters vote on emotion and not logic. With the appeal this guy has to women, minorities, and the lazy people will vote for him no matter what. Just as his fanbase is in love with him, the elites etc. are in love with the blind devotion of his following.

And yes Trump is an idiot and attention whore, but who cares? It's the evidence that deserves attention, not him.

A dog could have run against McCain and won. Terrible ticket in 2008, terrible ticket in 2012.