that's facepalm-worthy. absolutely anyone who's spent any time in the industry at all doesn't need to investigate that claim to know they are either outright lying or manipulating the definition of a "winner". the claim is so comical there isn't much more that can be said about it.
My thoughts exactly when I read it. But after some digging I saw the article on bloomberg.com picking it #1 best performing newsletter. Bloomberg being a respected news outlet in the industry I didn't think it would give that kind of award to a newsletter that made untrue or misleading claims, so my interest was peaked even more. But the marketer in me is still calling bullshit. So I dont fucking know.