Now the damn Hippies have started to form a cluster here in the Minneapolis area too.
OccupyMN | Minnesota Stands United
OccupyMN | Minnesota Stands United
So they should get my sympathy because they are too ignorant and/or lazy to make smart decisions? I've got no problem with people protesting. What I have a problem with is why/where these particular idiots are protesting. A quick browse on the OccupyWallSt.org forums shows all you need to know. They are not protesting to right a wrong. To stop an injustices. They are simply doing it because they feel that those who have made more money than the rest should have it taken from them by force and given to another group of people.
If they really wanted to attack the source of corruption, this would be happening on the steps of Capitol Hill, not Wall St.
natural selection. only the strong survive, only the wise excel.see... why this fuck them attitude? and i'm not attacking you, I just really don't get the mindset that so many seem to have.
They got duped, conned, manipulated...they are not bad or even dumb people. More than likely, just distracted...have no fucking clue what's going on in the world. Either way, why the fuck them stupid welfare hoarding pieces of shit attitude?
Much better and more coherent. Needs a lot of work but at least it's a starting point.
If they really wanted to attack the source of corruption, this would be happening on the steps of Capitol Hill, not Wall St.
2 words: George Soros. Move on, people.
What about the young guy who decided following his passion was more important than money, and drowned himself in debt to become a chemist, physicist, biologist, or whatever? Now he's $60k in debt, can't find a job in his field, and is realizing he's getting fucked with a giant red, white, and blue pole harder & harder every day by the banks and corps. And these are the guys that come up with neat things like penicillin, the internet, flight technology, etc.
Can't really just pass them all off as lowlife deadbeats looking for a handout, because that's simply not true. Everyone wants a good, comfortable life, but not everyone's passion is to make as much money as they possibly can. Simple fact is, the US economy sucks, and it's no secret the banks and corps have been raping & pillaging as much as they can for decades now. Although I don't give a shit about some pink haired girl with googly eyes screaming, "i'm a unique individual! listen to me!!!!", you gotta admit, the point in general is something to be pissed about. Thieves are making out with hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayer money, and destroying the middle class in the process.
You are agreeing with the demands or the fact that they are at least getting better at figuring out what they want?
The list of demands sounds like a list of Democrat issues. Where's mention of the deregulation of Futures and derivatives signed by Clinton? I am certain they wouldn't want that to be canceled and yet it is a factor, isn't it?
And why so much talk about corporations out of politics, how about no corporations when there are no unions allowed.
The movement is a joke, and to all of you that say the Tea Party is a bunch of corporate "shills" - get out of your social bubble.
It is amazing how none of these people even lay any blame at all on the feet of the homeowners that lied about income, about assets, and about everything else in order to get these loans. Did the mean Banker make them do that too?
When will people learn. It is not about what the government is doing, it is about what you are doing. Of course the governemnt is a factor, but who leads whom? Why look to the government as a leader, the government should follow.
As a real estate agent who sold during the bubble, i can attest not a single mortgage officer , agent or such ever had to force anyone to lie on an application.
It's not that black & white though (never is). What about the young guy who decided following his passion was more important than money, and drowned himself in debt to become a chemist, physicist, biologist, or whatever? Now he's $60k in debt, can't find a job in his field, and is realizing he's getting fucked with a giant red, white, and blue pole harder & harder every day by the banks and corps. And these are the guys that come up with neat things like penicillin, the internet, flight technology, etc.
+rep
Can't really just pass them all off as lowlife deadbeats looking for a handout, because that's simply not true. Everyone wants a good, comfortable life, but not everyone's passion is to make as much money as they possibly can. Simple fact is, the US economy sucks, and it's no secret the banks and corps have been raping & pillaging as much as they can for decades now. Although I don't give a shit about some pink haired girl with googly eyes screaming, "i'm a unique individual! listen to me!!!!", you gotta admit, the point in general is something to be pissed about. Thieves are making out with hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayer money, and destroying the middle class in the process.
Nah, I just mean when people protest in other countries, the citizens many times will say, "well, you know, they have a point and have a right to have their voices heard". When people protest in the US, the more likely reaction is, "fucken deadbeats wanting a handout!", or maybe, "fucken losers! if you hate the US so much, get the fuck out!".
So they should get my sympathy because they are too ignorant and/or lazy to make smart decisions? I've got no problem with people protesting. What I have a problem with is why/where these particular idiots are protesting. A quick browse on the OccupyWallSt.org forums shows all you need to know. They are not protesting to right a wrong. To stop an injustices. They are simply doing it because they feel that those who have made more money than the rest should have it taken from them by force and given to another group of people.
If they really wanted to attack the source of corruption, this would be happening on the steps of Capitol Hill, not Wall St.
Yes, these protesters are completely uninformed, but I do see huge potential to expose them to the truth. I might head over to OccupyDallas, whenever that is, and do some 'splaining.
So, you can all wait for the perfect little protest scenario, with nothing but like-minded entrepreneurial participants. All with strong views of free market capitalism. Free of any leftists, commies, white trash, bums, leeches, beggars...and any other people you may not like.
Actually, I'm not going to protest at all. I've got nothing to protest about...because I paid attention to the world. I didn't buy a house I couldn't afford because I knew to never sign any binding document without having an attorney and/or accountant look at it first. I didn't get myself into $50,000+ of student loan debt because I'm not foolish enough to accrue that kind of obligation without having some plan to pay it off (hoping to get a job with a degree you hope the market will want is not a plan). I, unlike the majority of those who blame Wall Street, do not ignore the world and hope the government will have it handled. And that is the problem. There is no personal accountability.
It requires someone to hunker down and spend time on their own reading Hayek or Mises.
The Road To Serfdom, p. 148F.A. Hayek said:There is no reason why in a society which has reached the general level of wealth which ours has attained [that a minimum income] should not be guaranteed to all without endangering general freedom. [...] there can be no doubt that some minimum of food, shelter, and clothing, sufficient to preserve the health and the capacity to work, can be assured to everybody. Indeed, for a considerable part of the population of England this sort of security has long been achieved.
Nor is there any reason why the state should not assist the individuals in providing for those common hazards of life against which, because of their uncertainty, few individuals can make adequate provision. Where, as in the case of sickness and accident, [...] the case for the state's helping to organize a comprehensive system of social insurance is very strong. [...] there is no incompatibility in principle between the state's providing a greater security in this way and the preservation of individual freedom.