MegaPinger

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know there's no steadfast rule but what is the average time you've seen your sites indexed after running thru mega pinger?
 


Rexibit said:
That is a loaded question and depends on so many factors:

  • How good your LinkList is
  • How good your profiles are (are you just dropping 10+ links and moving on or taking the time to build a quality profile that doesn't look like you're spamming, how many links you're dropping at a time, etc)
  • Which services you are using to ping
  • If Google's determined the source of the link as a non-credible site
  • Etc.
Mine usually get indexed within 1-2 days. You might see yours faster or much slower. It really depends on the care you take before blasting and what kind of spammer you are.


The price is already super inexpensive. Matt hasn't raised the cost, even though he's continually added additional functionality. It's a great program.


Look at some of the ping services and see what titles are usually. They're often just blog titles. So, make something that sounds like one, include spintax, and go.
Click to expand...

Thanks for this answer, you've answered my question.
 
Anyone...

Formats for private proxies.

I've tried the following formats:

username:password@aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd:port
aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd:port

Neither of them work.

Can anyone please tell me how I use private proxies in conjunction with MegaPinger.

Thanks.
 
OK, without the smiley faces which should be 'at' signs (it doesn't help much to have crap like that getting in the way, forum designers take note):

Formats for private proxies.

I've tried the following formats:

username@assword@aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd@ort
aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd@ort

Neither of them work.

Can anyone please tell me how I use private proxies in conjunction with MegaPinger.

Thanks.
 
TIPS ON INCREASING SUCCESS RATES NEEDED

I ran my first batch of pings which went pretty good. I had about a 80%
success rate so i really can't complain. Did 6k pings with 1k failing. I use
spun titles, 1 second delay, private proxies and threads set to 100. So here are my questions below.

1.) What can I do to increase my success rates even more?
2.) What techniques is everyone using to try to extract and re-run only the failed attempts?
 
INDEXING NOT HAPPENING FOR PROFILE LINKS

I've pinged 50 of my profile link pages, 5 days ago but still none of them are indexed. I made sure I used good spun titles to submit each and my profile links are not spammed out. Each contains 4-5 links only and a small amount of text. What I'm I doing wrong and has anyone else had this problem?
 
justice4all, profile links don't count for much. Google is aware of them when you ping them, yahoo is too, but it doesn't include them in the inlinks listing. It's just the way it us..

I've got a few hundred profile inlinks showing up on my site profile though, that's because I've got thousands upon thousands, and I've backlinked forum profiles to other forum profiles that link to my money site.

50 profiles don't mean much, I would through out an optimistic guess of 1% of forum profile inlinks turn up on yahoo site explorer.. so it makes sense then you're don't indenx..



How I'm operating this. I'm not running enough xrumer submissions to do the pinging process any faster..

I have 100 threads going with 0 second delay between pings, I have a repository of 175 working proxies.

I have no more threads than I have proxies, I'm hoping to collect a list of 200+ proxies so that I can run 200 threads.
 
One more thing when I started, I got a success rate of 80% it's slowly slowly creeped down to 63%.. I've always been slowly increasing my proxy numbers and my thread numbers, went from 50 to 300..

I would say keep the threads low, or if you want to do the fast, make sure you have thousands of working proxies working at a time. I have a list of 344 proxies, and I think some of them have burnt out so I need to replace them.

If you blast through the list with too many threads, I'm guess it's going to raise flags with the search engines and pinging services, and proxies are going to get temporarily banned.

In which case you will need to give it around 24 hours for the proxies to be removed from their blacklist.
 
What I've found, and Matt is aware of this, is that Proxyfinder doesn't work well with large lists of sites to scrape. It just stops checking them after so long. So, I have 4 copies of Proxyfinder working and made a Python script to automatically run a Windows batch file every 5 minutes that will merge my 4 lists into one. This allows me to have 4 separate lists of sources for ProxyFinder. I have around 1000-1200 proxies in my list at any given time. Sometimes it'll go down to 700 depending on how often those sites get updated, but it's usually 1000+.

What I do is run 500 threads on MegaPinger with a 2 second delay. I usually get around 840+ pings/min.

I run this on my Dedicated server though. It eats up 40% of my CPU running those 4 instances, and another 20% for MegaPinger if it's on my personal computer, whereas it's just 10% together on my server.
 
TigerUK said:
justice4all, profile links don't count for much. Google is aware of them when you ping them, yahoo is too, but it doesn't include them in the inlinks listing. It's just the way it us..

I've got a few hundred profile inlinks showing up on my site profile though, that's because I've got thousands upon thousands, and I've backlinked forum profiles to other forum profiles that link to my money site.

50 profiles don't mean much, I would through out an optimistic guess of 1% of forum profile inlinks turn up on yahoo site explorer.. so it makes sense then you're don't indenx..



How I'm operating this. I'm not running enough xrumer submissions to do the pinging process any faster..

I have 100 threads going with 0 second delay between pings, I have a repository of 175 working proxies.

I have no more threads than I have proxies, I'm hoping to collect a list of 200+ proxies so that I can run 200 threads.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the feedback TigerUK but let me clarify. I'm not trying or concerned with having the profile links appear in yahoo's link explorer as backlinks. I'm just trying to get them indexed. Meaning if you type in the url into google, the profile link page will appear in the search results. That's the only way I know of to confirm that Google actually see's and has indexed the page. Without that all those links are doing jack for your rankings. And I'm totally aware you need tons of profile links to, to have a good effect but again I'm just testing methods to find the best way to get indexed.

I've used other methods and many more of the links actually got indexed than my 1st test with this tool. So I'm trying to see if there is something wrong or is everyone here mistaken with the power of this tool. Let me know. Thanks
 
Hey Matt, care to chime in here. I'm liking your tool for it's functionality but the whole reason I bought it was to index profile links but it's failing me thus far. Let me know. Thanks
 
From my understanding, just because a page isn't indexed doesn't mean that Google doesn't know about it. It can simply mean that Google doesn't think it's worth displaying it to people, but your backlink is still there. Pinging should help Google find the profiles, but not necessarily index them.
 
NightG said:
From my understanding, just because a page isn't indexed doesn't mean that Google doesn't know about it. It can simply mean that Google doesn't think it's worth displaying it to people, but your backlink is still there. Pinging should help Google find the profiles, but not necessarily index them.
Click to expand...

hmmmmmm that's the first time I've heard that one and find it a wee bit hard to believe. It's all progmatic so don't you think if you're typing in the exact url that it has to be displayed if it's been spidered? I surely think so and to prove the point, i have some profile links on the same root domain that are indexed and appear in the search results and others that are not. Let me know your thoughts
 
Google has a lot of policies and procedures that are annoying for webmasters, marketers, and advertisers but are good for searchers (think quality enforcement with Adwords or Adsense). It makes sense that Google wouldn't index profile pages as most of them don't have any real merit to them. Of course, just because something makes sense doesn't make it true. It's simply something I've read before and I honestly don't think Google tries to index every webpage on the internet.

I'm confused on your last point, what point does that prove?
 
I gotta chime in to say that I spent the better part of a week trying to get this thing to work on Windows XP. I did all the patches, etc. Still working extremely poorly. Tonight I borrowed a friend's Windows 7 computer for testing purposes and ran it, and it works just like it should. :) Maybe that will save some other people some time.
 
Ok, so I bought a copy of Windows 7 and installed it. MegaPinger works great. If you're trying to run it on WinXP and having trouble, don't waste your time...
 
NightG said:
Google has a lot of policies and procedures that are annoying for webmasters, marketers, and advertisers but are good for searchers (think quality enforcement with Adwords or Adsense). It makes sense that Google wouldn't index profile pages as most of them don't have any real merit to them. Of course, just because something makes sense doesn't make it true. It's simply something I've read before and I honestly don't think Google tries to index every webpage on the internet.

I'm confused on your last point, what point does that prove?
Click to expand...

agreed, profile pages are 99.9% identicial to each other, with the exception of the page title, listed username, and the hyperlinked signature. Other than that no significance what so ever.

Question is though does the backlink count even if google chooses not to publicly index your article?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom