JP Grunin: From $10,000 to $100,000 in 6 months.

Like Mike Schank from American Movie said, "With the lottery sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. But with drugs you always lose." Cut Grunin some slack, bros.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbN-7Y3SZao]American Movie - Mike Schank screams - YouTube[/ame]
 
  • Like
Reactions: IceToEskimos


LOR2Wtg.gif


sjMnuBo.gif


Perfect example why people who are trying to build wealth in the short term (less than 10 years) should avoid the stock market. Mgrunin will be fine but if somebody only had $10k - $50k to invest there are much better opportunities out there that are in your control and can be leveraged by your knowledge and effort. The world's top hedge funds have all the money, brains, and computing power in the world and they fight day in and day out with all of that talent to achieve anything over 10%.
 
Serious question. Does anyone still think he's a good trader?

Here is the dirty secret: There are probably less than 20 members here who have enough knowledge to analyze and criticize his trades (I am not one of them either).

All I know is that his trades were risky and that the AAPL one was shocking. His risk management didn't seem good enough to me. Some of the EliteTrader guys have posted saying the same thing. At the same time, he needed to take risks to get to $100,000.

Will he be successful?

From being slaughtered as ROIShare, he came back very well.

It is happening again. He has time and money on his side. He can afford to make mistakes. He has enough technical knowledge about trading. He will have more successes than failures while trading, it is just a matter of time.

Just give him enough time to finish weeping, reading all these posts ;)
 
I think the main problem was that tech stocks are/were in a big sell off trend and he was going long the Nasdaq and the biggest tech stock.

Sometimes you can have a strategy that works really well for a period of time, but when the trends change, if you aren't able to identify that, you can get run over.
 
Serious question bros - Is options trading/futures glorified gambling?

I know a dozen people who have lost serious sums of cash in options trading (One guy lost something like 40k, which was all he had). To those dozen guys who have lost significant sums of money, I know one guy who makes maybe 4% or 5% per month off options trading and he says it's impossible to do much more than that.
 
In a nutshell this is why pure technical trading (the stuff that mgrunin is doing) is bullshit.

And in any instance where pure technical trading would work, trading algorithms will take advantage of them and close the gap quicker than you can even type in a trade. Computers are better at looking at charts than you are, and they will certainly be far more disciplined.

Most of the mistakes you quoted have nothing to do with technical trading.

Averaging down? poor position sizing?

Not doing basic checks on things like ex-dividend date?

I laughed a few pages back when people were arguing whether that's technical or fundamental. It's neither, it's common sense. Anyone should be aware of that type of shit whether they trade on fundamentals or technicals or both, and OP fucked up and I'm sure he'd admit it too.

Not that I give 2 fucks if everyone else thinks technical trading is voodoo or luck or bullshit. Less competition for me.
 
Serious question bros - Is options trading/futures glorified gambling?

I know a dozen people who have lost serious sums of cash in options trading (One guy lost something like 40k, which was all he had). To those dozen guys who have lost significant sums of money, I know one guy who makes maybe 4% or 5% per month off options trading and he says it's impossible to do much more than that.
I think you answered your own question as it relates to those whom you're envisioning will do the trading - but you're veering away from a central element of capital markets.

The function of the marketplace is provide liquidity. There's so much liquidity, in fact, that it creates position taking opportunities to trade off of relative values - so think of the activity of trading as a by-product of a larger game.

The business of Wall Street is to sell. Ideas are sold ("You gotta get paid, your company needs to go public. Let's stay in touch.") and functionality is sold ("Your retirement fund needs to diversify, what happens if the yen crashes? Lemme manage that shit for you."); ideally a trading desk of a big investment bank like Morgan Stanley's complements services provided large institutional customers, which are treated by the bank as clients. If a big mutual fund wants to get out of one name ("Want to unwind this position 600,000 shares of Pfizer") or into another (A fund might acquire a significant position in AAPL by buying chunks every day, entrusting a MSCO trader, a "sell side" trader, to do so price effectively and on the sly) ... that big fund (Fidelity) also wants relationships and information that can flow from Morgan Stanley's investment bankers and research ('institutional research' departments ... hello?) - thus these big market operations share the same universe as the technical traders who plop down a few grand to take on all comers. Not competing per se, but one's activities can have serious impact on the other. Martin, win or lose, like any other retail trader is a guppy in a whale tank - and I'm probably overstating the guppy's presence here.

And of what we saw that happened in this thread - the same shit can happen to seasoned institutional pros (trading other people's money, of course - maybe a year end bonus takes a hit) trading names they know like the back of their hand.

So, yeah, it's gambling, but unlike a poker game or a casino - the very existence of these markets is not to provide gambling opportunities for those seeking some quick money. I'm in no way saying that quick money isn't possible to come by, but it's an important concept to remember.

The game is too big for me. I don't want to play. I have no idea what the greek talk is, or the chartist stuff (and I actually sell technical/fundamental alert software product to institutional traders) - all I know is that on Wall St. relationships matter and that closing a deal is about a thousand times more valuable than winning a trade.

OPM.
 
ODylNNC.jpg

The irony









lulz

Takes money to make money friend. Who cares if he's bankrolled by his pops or he is sitting at a trading desk and bankrolled by other "fathers or investors".. Just saying welcome to trading/finance and keep :love-smiley-086:
 
Serious question bros - Is options trading/futures glorified gambling?

I know a dozen people who have lost serious sums of cash in options trading (One guy lost something like 40k, which was all he had). To those dozen guys who have lost significant sums of money, I know one guy who makes maybe 4% or 5% per month off options trading and he says it's impossible to do much more than that.

Yes.. If you don't know what you are doing or aren't watching things like a HAWK! Simply put, go to NYC/Chicago/LA or any major investment powerhouse and you will find hundreds of "daytrading or investment coaching" guru's that will teach you how to "invest and make Millions" and 99% of the people like your friend loose their shirt!!

I can tell you some crazy stories, just the other day I was talking to a colleague and he was like "oh if I move $15k of money into this checking account for 60 days Chase Bank will give me $400." Oh ok great, he started reading the * and fine print and it wasn't 60 days, it was $200 after the 60 days and another $200 after 6 months. Not only that, but you will have every financial advisor from Chase Bank (I know because I used to do this) calling you up and pitching "the next best annuity or 'investment opportunity that the bank is pushing them to sell that week and provides the highest commissions for the financial advisor). Which I really wouldn't call them that and is the reason you SHOULD NEVER take advice or base your investments on what "the guy at xyz trading company or bank tells you." Heck even the wiffee's sister got burned to the tune of $60,000 after "listening to some 401k advisor at Fid***ty investments.... "
.
 
And in any instance where pure technical trading would work, trading algorithms will take advantage of them and close the gap quicker than you can even type in a trade. Computers are better at looking at charts than you are, and they will certainly be far more disciplined.

Not sure if you're only referring only to day trading, but technical trading is still very much alive and well for longer positions.

Serious question bros - Is options trading/futures glorified gambling?

I know a dozen people who have lost serious sums of cash in options trading (One guy lost something like 40k, which was all he had). To those dozen guys who have lost significant sums of money, I know one guy who makes maybe 4% or 5% per month off options trading and he says it's impossible to do much more than that.

Yes, more or less, it is glorified gambling. That doesn't mean that there still aren't independent traders making money consistently, much like a professional gambler- there is skill involved as well. Your dozen buddies probably had no clue what they were doing, it can take years to get good at trading. And I can tell you firsthand that it's not impossible to make more than 5%/mo, at least for a year or so. It's just very difficult and requires the right circumstances.
 
Simply put, go to NYC/Chicago/LA or any major investment powerhouse and you will find hundreds of "daytrading or investment coaching" guru's that will teach you how to "invest and make Millions" and 99% of the people like your friend loose their shirt!!
What? Please name one "major investment powerhouse" that features an in-house guru on hand to teach people how to trade. Just one of these many hundreds, please.
 
What? Please name one "major investment powerhouse" that features an in-house guru on hand to teach people how to trade. Just one of these many hundreds, please.

WF featuring mgrunin. amirite?

'course rite now he's AWOL but he might be back. maybe.
 
this reminds me of the 'mom & pop real estate baron era' circa 2000-2006.

mgrunin played massively overvalued momentum stocks during a period of market lunacy, got cocky, and thought he was awesome. he hit a correction, but to his credit, he has yet to blame the brokerages for his losses, which makes him much more honorable than the aforementioned 'mom & pop' fucksticks.