Bulk blog comments

Status
Not open for further replies.
I placed an order last night. Sent PM with details (actually sent two...the second one has the corrected URL details). Looking forward to my report!

Thanks,
Alexa
 


Ordered Friday evening ... Transaction ID 4RV45189UY742605T
PM sent with link details.
Looking forward to the report.
 
I'd like to order the 3000 package. Can you let me know what you need from me.
Do you offer volume discounts?
 
I tried to stay quiet and just lurk but it's just so damn hard... Matt had to go and make me break my perfect record of no posts here on WF... Dammit!

Matt: Want to buy a bunch of your stuff... Can't pm yet because I've never posted b4... What to do?

BTW: Got a package rate for some of these, proxyfinder and megapinger?

Thanks,
Luke
 
Need some help with your syntax
http://yourURL.com|||{anchor1|anchor2|anchor3|etc|etc}

What would be the syntax if I have 2 urls?

In Xrumer I can use specific anchors for every url I use. Is it possible for your service to post, for example, url1 with {anchor1|anchor2|anchor3...} and url2 with {anchor4|anchor5|anchor6}. I mean {anchor1|anchor2|anchor3...} should be used only for url1 and {anchor4|anchor5|anchor6} should be used only for url2.
 
Need some help with your syntax
http://yourURL.com|||{anchor1|anchor2|anchor3|etc|etc}

What would be the syntax if I have 2 urls?

In Xrumer I can use specific anchors for every url I use. Is it possible for your service to post, for example, url1 with {anchor1|anchor2|anchor3...} and url2 with {anchor4|anchor5|anchor6}. I mean {anchor1|anchor2|anchor3...} should be used only for url1 and {anchor4|anchor5|anchor6} should be used only for url2.

You can have anchors tied to specific urls, that's the whole point of the syntax.

url1|||{anchor for url1|another url1 anchor}
url2|||{some url2 anchor|url2 blah}
 
That was quick!

:bowdown:
Wow, I spoke too soon... You must have been sending it just as I wrote that last post!

Thanks Matt, got the package in hand now.

-Luke
 
Status
Not open for further replies.