BacklinkArena - 0.18 per link - 900+ links - dripped blogs, web 2.0, wikis, + MOAR!!
- Thread starter onthewayup
- Start date
- Status
One of the projects i've had completed has seen a rise of around 30 places for one of the keywords i targeted, which is now on page 1. The others seem to be generally rising, and this is just a day after completion.
Will see how this holds up and how the others improve over time.
Cheers.
Will see how this holds up and how the others improve over time.
Cheers.
JimmyN - Thank you for your feedback. Make sure to try and add content every week for maximum results.
Just wanted to update...one site that was sent into oblivion about a month - 2 ago (aka sandbox) was just brought back to life by the BLA package. I targeted 3 kws...one is still nowhere to be found but the other 2 are close to where they were before they got thrown out and it brought other ones to life as well. This site was starting to piss me off.
This order was completed on the 9th and yesterday...I'll let the screenshot do the talking:
I like it when shit's green...
This order was completed on the 9th and yesterday...I'll let the screenshot do the talking:
I like it when shit's green...
Just wanted to update...one site that was sent into oblivion about a month - 2 ago (aka sandbox) was just brought back to life by the BLA package. I targeted 3 kws...one is still nowhere to be found but the other 2 are close to where they were before they got thrown out and it brought other ones to life as well. This site was starting to piss me off.
This order was completed on the 9th and yesterday...I'll let the screenshot do the talking:
I like it when shit's green...
Awesome review bro, lovin' the green too
Ordered another
Hey, just ordered another level 2 heavy hitter. Need this one completed asap even quicker than the one from 2 days ago.
I was having an issue with paypal so you may see a dupe order.
Also if you can make sure this one has a separate account on your client portal.
Thanks a ton, appreciate it!
Hey, just ordered another level 2 heavy hitter. Need this one completed asap even quicker than the one from 2 days ago.
I was having an issue with paypal so you may see a dupe order.
Also if you can make sure this one has a separate account on your client portal.
Thanks a ton, appreciate it!
guesswho - we'll put a rush on it. I'll erase one if I see a dup. order so I'm not confused.
Will queue orders tonight after I finish these 8 backlinkarenas.
Will queue orders tonight after I finish these 8 backlinkarenas.
Player77 - order queued
andyveer - Yes, when you pay through the link, there is an option to pay through credit card (this is standard through paypal). The discount is already applied through the form.
Thanks guys!
andyveer - Yes, when you pay through the link, there is an option to pay through credit card (this is standard through paypal). The discount is already applied through the form.
Thanks guys!
jasonpoxxon - I want to say yes, but I would hop on over to river's thread and order is 1k bookmarking service first. Then, wait a week or two and come back to me. I'd hate to sandbox your site on the first go-round.
I have purchased twice from onthewayup and a little check up oft he Wikis actually made me very upset about the so called ‚quality‘ he delivers same as a post which surprisingly got deleted from this thread of an upset customer and therefore I checked up a lot manually and honestly came up with a fucking unexpected result which I am about to explain here.
This might be the reason why my site dropped completely off after I ordered a HeavyHitter 3 which followed the initial Heavyhitter 2. I wish I had discovered this earlier as for sure my reviews would not have been that positive. Beside that, I chatted to him via skype to give him a chance to improve his service but after finding out he re-uses content as proven in the Wiki property explanation I think it’s just fair to let everybody know… As this packages are expensive and should be quality and quantity, quantity of links not footprints. He is acting like he has nothing to hide and fights for his customers and ‘stays ahead of competition’ so I am pretty much sure he will have explanations for all stat stuff I am about to write down.
Here are some facts for my HeavyHitter3 package which should explain why I feel cheated on this:
1 – 10 WIKI PROPERTIES
In the opening thread it’s said: ‘Take 1 100% unique (not ezine rewrites) 400 word article - spin it to 80% unique + readable’
Well I thought I’d just put one article of a Wiki into copyscape premium and it came up with a couple of really interesting results:
‘The page below has 324 words matching 74% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:‘
Well actually the real interesting shit about this result is that this was found on a domain which is also used in the BLA report under the Moodle section. The page has the ticket id of 171 while mine has the ticket id 160. Now you might think someone might have copied the content he created, but hey: why are there wiki pages created on his privatewiki network linking to the same domain as in the moodle ticket which I just discovered ? Actually this means he re-used my article for a different customer who had the same niche. Btw. I checked up for one Wiki article only and there were 11 results all to other orders than mine (means duplicate content and linking to competitors site) and my order was posted to the moddle ticket system and the wiki 5 days prior to the other guy with same niche. Nice footprint btw. as well and not provided a 100% unique article for the moodle articles as mentioned in the opening post by him ‘Take 1 100% unique (not ezine rewrites) 400 word article - spin it to 80% unique + readable’ and also not spun to the level he tells his customers he will spin it to.
Beside that, I did a check up of his praised wiki network for 10 domains provided in the BLA package and came up with the following result:
This is probably the most fucking footprint I have ever seen and I don’t know how people like Grindstone, Magic Hat or whoever are able to post a positive review about this wiki shit as it’s all over footprints. To avoid him coming up with stating he used different wikis for their reviews about the wiki service, I need to tell you guys that onthewayup told me on skype they are the same wikis used in the BLA package and wiki package and wrote that in his Wiki thread too…
Here are the stats of this wonderful service:
10 domains the wikis are hosted on have (details according to mr. onthewayup himselve: http://www.wickedfire.com/1245451-post309.html stating: 10 C Class IPs, 7 Domains between 2 and 9 years, 2 between 1 and 2 years, 1 is 7 months old:
IPs: 3x one IP, 4x one IP, 3 x unique IPs (remember it’s supposed to be ‘Each wiki is on a different class C IP address’)
The same registrant including Name, address, phone, e-mail, administrative contact: 10/10 (means 10 times same name, same adress, same everything)
The same reverse mx record: 8/10
Same Registrar company: 10/10
Same Nameservers: 0/10
Some more about the wikis: not a single wiki has a Logo inserted, not a single Wiki has modified standard pages like main page and all over the very much standard mediawiki content is still included.
Beside that for the guys who ordered a Wiki package: check your time about ‘this page was last modified on xx.xx.xx at xx.xx’, as I found a LOT of posts which have exactly the same date and time and very similar (poor spun) titles too – again to ensure the footprints. Strange I also did not find a single image inserted into my wikis as this was advertised as well by ‘Each wiki will have images where applicable’. Beside that I almost forgot to mention the wonderful ‘recent changes’ page which looks almost same on all wikis. Even the time is exactly the same for articles to be inserted so stop bullshitting about manual – who can put up 10 articles in 1 minute ?
2 – 20 WEB PROPERTIES
I checked 1 random article out of a web 2.0 property onthewayup created by using copyscape premium and here we go:
The page below has 205 words matching 51% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 219 words matching 55% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
Again, far away from 80% as stated in the opening thread. The properties are using the same username and passwords for each property created and therefore I personally doubt that they are created manually. Again, far from ‘Each Web 2.0 property will have images where applicable’ as he said in his opening post for this service, the most properties do not include any image or stuff. After logging into the e-mail used for the property creation, the properties are created minute after minute. Honestly I doubt anybody can create a property in one minute including getting to the URL, filling the register form and click through the whole procedure and come back to the next site and start over.
3 – 50 ARTICLE DIRECTORY ARTICLES
Let’s catch another footprint and here we go:
Grabbed one random article for copyscape and again the results are about 50% each for the other article directory articles when it comes to being unique but still far away from the advertised 80% uniqueness. Moreover, 13 directories are hosted with the same IP + NS which could be improved as well for sure…
4 – 200+ Moodle and Ticket System Articles
Generally spoken after re-ordering my HeavyHitter3, his list is pretty much short on this. For my HH2 compared to HH3, 87% domains used were similar in this moodle ticket link system which basically makes the whole BLA impossible to use more than once with all the former footprints combined with this. Diversity is not like that.
I was told that they improve from 200+ to 350 different sites they post this shit on, but I really do wonder how this was improved so much when I was one of the first guys to order and even the very first HeavyHitter I bought had 295 links thrown in for that to compensate for the incredibly high deletion rate of this links. Now imagine all the packages done using only that few domains – nice footprint and so damn easy to pick off due to duplicate content issue. Ah wait here’s a random check up of one moddle ticket articles – whatch for the 80% uniqueness:
Ticket1:
The page below has 434 words matching 100% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 434 words matching 100% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 434 words matching 100% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 240 words matching 55% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 215 words matching 50% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
Ticket2:
The page below has 449 words matching 100% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 368 words matching 82% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 233 words matching 52% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 239 words matching 53% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 229 words matching 51% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
I’ll also wonder how spammed this properties are, just type in some shit like ‘insurance’ or ‘payday’ or most interesting Viagra/enhancement and you’ll see the spamrate. Not only onthewayup uses them, but also some linkbuilders already spammed them during 2010 so is this really the way to ‘stay ahead of competition’ to starting a service other guys are doing for more than half a year already ?
5 – 125 Dripped Articles into 125 Blog Network
This is probably one of the very few good parts of this service but it’s provided by a 3rd partie.
This might be the reason why my site dropped completely off after I ordered a HeavyHitter 3 which followed the initial Heavyhitter 2. I wish I had discovered this earlier as for sure my reviews would not have been that positive. Beside that, I chatted to him via skype to give him a chance to improve his service but after finding out he re-uses content as proven in the Wiki property explanation I think it’s just fair to let everybody know… As this packages are expensive and should be quality and quantity, quantity of links not footprints. He is acting like he has nothing to hide and fights for his customers and ‘stays ahead of competition’ so I am pretty much sure he will have explanations for all stat stuff I am about to write down.
Here are some facts for my HeavyHitter3 package which should explain why I feel cheated on this:
1 – 10 WIKI PROPERTIES
In the opening thread it’s said: ‘Take 1 100% unique (not ezine rewrites) 400 word article - spin it to 80% unique + readable’
Well I thought I’d just put one article of a Wiki into copyscape premium and it came up with a couple of really interesting results:
‘The page below has 324 words matching 74% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:‘
Well actually the real interesting shit about this result is that this was found on a domain which is also used in the BLA report under the Moodle section. The page has the ticket id of 171 while mine has the ticket id 160. Now you might think someone might have copied the content he created, but hey: why are there wiki pages created on his privatewiki network linking to the same domain as in the moodle ticket which I just discovered ? Actually this means he re-used my article for a different customer who had the same niche. Btw. I checked up for one Wiki article only and there were 11 results all to other orders than mine (means duplicate content and linking to competitors site) and my order was posted to the moddle ticket system and the wiki 5 days prior to the other guy with same niche. Nice footprint btw. as well and not provided a 100% unique article for the moodle articles as mentioned in the opening post by him ‘Take 1 100% unique (not ezine rewrites) 400 word article - spin it to 80% unique + readable’ and also not spun to the level he tells his customers he will spin it to.
Beside that, I did a check up of his praised wiki network for 10 domains provided in the BLA package and came up with the following result:
This is probably the most fucking footprint I have ever seen and I don’t know how people like Grindstone, Magic Hat or whoever are able to post a positive review about this wiki shit as it’s all over footprints. To avoid him coming up with stating he used different wikis for their reviews about the wiki service, I need to tell you guys that onthewayup told me on skype they are the same wikis used in the BLA package and wiki package and wrote that in his Wiki thread too…
Here are the stats of this wonderful service:
10 domains the wikis are hosted on have (details according to mr. onthewayup himselve: http://www.wickedfire.com/1245451-post309.html stating: 10 C Class IPs, 7 Domains between 2 and 9 years, 2 between 1 and 2 years, 1 is 7 months old:
IPs: 3x one IP, 4x one IP, 3 x unique IPs (remember it’s supposed to be ‘Each wiki is on a different class C IP address’)
The same registrant including Name, address, phone, e-mail, administrative contact: 10/10 (means 10 times same name, same adress, same everything)
The same reverse mx record: 8/10
Same Registrar company: 10/10
Same Nameservers: 0/10
Some more about the wikis: not a single wiki has a Logo inserted, not a single Wiki has modified standard pages like main page and all over the very much standard mediawiki content is still included.
Beside that for the guys who ordered a Wiki package: check your time about ‘this page was last modified on xx.xx.xx at xx.xx’, as I found a LOT of posts which have exactly the same date and time and very similar (poor spun) titles too – again to ensure the footprints. Strange I also did not find a single image inserted into my wikis as this was advertised as well by ‘Each wiki will have images where applicable’. Beside that I almost forgot to mention the wonderful ‘recent changes’ page which looks almost same on all wikis. Even the time is exactly the same for articles to be inserted so stop bullshitting about manual – who can put up 10 articles in 1 minute ?
2 – 20 WEB PROPERTIES
I checked 1 random article out of a web 2.0 property onthewayup created by using copyscape premium and here we go:
The page below has 205 words matching 51% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 219 words matching 55% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
Again, far away from 80% as stated in the opening thread. The properties are using the same username and passwords for each property created and therefore I personally doubt that they are created manually. Again, far from ‘Each Web 2.0 property will have images where applicable’ as he said in his opening post for this service, the most properties do not include any image or stuff. After logging into the e-mail used for the property creation, the properties are created minute after minute. Honestly I doubt anybody can create a property in one minute including getting to the URL, filling the register form and click through the whole procedure and come back to the next site and start over.
3 – 50 ARTICLE DIRECTORY ARTICLES
Let’s catch another footprint and here we go:
Grabbed one random article for copyscape and again the results are about 50% each for the other article directory articles when it comes to being unique but still far away from the advertised 80% uniqueness. Moreover, 13 directories are hosted with the same IP + NS which could be improved as well for sure…
4 – 200+ Moodle and Ticket System Articles
Generally spoken after re-ordering my HeavyHitter3, his list is pretty much short on this. For my HH2 compared to HH3, 87% domains used were similar in this moodle ticket link system which basically makes the whole BLA impossible to use more than once with all the former footprints combined with this. Diversity is not like that.
I was told that they improve from 200+ to 350 different sites they post this shit on, but I really do wonder how this was improved so much when I was one of the first guys to order and even the very first HeavyHitter I bought had 295 links thrown in for that to compensate for the incredibly high deletion rate of this links. Now imagine all the packages done using only that few domains – nice footprint and so damn easy to pick off due to duplicate content issue. Ah wait here’s a random check up of one moddle ticket articles – whatch for the 80% uniqueness:
Ticket1:
The page below has 434 words matching 100% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 434 words matching 100% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 434 words matching 100% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 240 words matching 55% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 215 words matching 50% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
Ticket2:
The page below has 449 words matching 100% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 368 words matching 82% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 233 words matching 52% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 239 words matching 53% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
The page below has 229 words matching 51% of the text, as highlighted by Copyscape:
I’ll also wonder how spammed this properties are, just type in some shit like ‘insurance’ or ‘payday’ or most interesting Viagra/enhancement and you’ll see the spamrate. Not only onthewayup uses them, but also some linkbuilders already spammed them during 2010 so is this really the way to ‘stay ahead of competition’ to starting a service other guys are doing for more than half a year already ?
5 – 125 Dripped Articles into 125 Blog Network
This is probably one of the very few good parts of this service but it’s provided by a 3rd partie.
Honestly I really feel like you pay for something you do not get in this package. The first results looked strong, fell back after that and after re-ordering were sandboxed although daily content updates are done to the site.
If you really check up all stuff combined about the BLA (personally I think the Super Mininet is still very strong as it isn’t flooded by footprints) even ordering just once you’ll get caught with a hell of footprints. What makes me really pissed about this stuff is that the BLA is advertised in a lot of so called case studies which in the end are useless as they need to be performed without updating content regularly – otherwise you’ll have this ‘I blow you out of the sandbox effect’ but nobody can tell if it’s due to the BLA or due to content updated regularly. Personally I have seen 2 sites now getting out of sandbox without any wonderpackages ordered, just regularly updating content.
Moreover especially the issue about the footprints in the wikis makes me upset. He clearly says that they are hosted on unqiue c-class ip’s and no footprints and shit like that which is all nothing but a lie. How the hell can you advertise this with the facts being like they are ? It’s like writing about selling your cars with 200 hp but actually it has only 50.
Moreover, I checked up some FREE reviews of Grindstone and eliquid in the Wiki thread and I would like to know if they either did not care about different c-class ip’s, did not check up or just were interested in free links ? How can you guys talk about top nodge shit with not even a logo inserted into the wikis and standard pages not even edited ? Not a single damn complain about logos not being inserted, no check up of the posting time footprint, no nothing…. If you check up the wikis even not being Einstein you will find a hell of footprints which nobody mentioned in his review. A random check of just 2 wikis will show same registrants. Given the facts both are well known, respected and seem to know their shit, I really would like to get an opinion from them about this and maybe some response about SERP movement too as I personally doubt this Wiki shit will have any positive impact and I also doubt the BLA really creates a longterm boost for your site. I’d simply love to hear some feedback from especially Grindstone about the impacts the BLA and the Wikis had on his sites… I am asking this as I have heard from several contacts who purchased this package (the BLA) and the wiki package that they have seen no results at all or had negative experience but not a single shit in onthewayup’s threads is posted about that. For me it seems this package creates some positive impact for the very first but drops value even faster after the footprints got picked up by Google and lots of moodle tickets get deleted or even better, like in my case, get indexed with a 100% duplicate content having your link in it.
If anybody needs a prove for what I am explaining here, hit me up in PM and you’ll get lots of proves. I really can just recommend to everybody who purchased a BLA package or a Wiki package to check up about content and footprints and you’ll get the same results which are far from what you expected.
You don't believe me, CHECK YOUR OWN ORDERS
If you really check up all stuff combined about the BLA (personally I think the Super Mininet is still very strong as it isn’t flooded by footprints) even ordering just once you’ll get caught with a hell of footprints. What makes me really pissed about this stuff is that the BLA is advertised in a lot of so called case studies which in the end are useless as they need to be performed without updating content regularly – otherwise you’ll have this ‘I blow you out of the sandbox effect’ but nobody can tell if it’s due to the BLA or due to content updated regularly. Personally I have seen 2 sites now getting out of sandbox without any wonderpackages ordered, just regularly updating content.
Moreover especially the issue about the footprints in the wikis makes me upset. He clearly says that they are hosted on unqiue c-class ip’s and no footprints and shit like that which is all nothing but a lie. How the hell can you advertise this with the facts being like they are ? It’s like writing about selling your cars with 200 hp but actually it has only 50.
Moreover, I checked up some FREE reviews of Grindstone and eliquid in the Wiki thread and I would like to know if they either did not care about different c-class ip’s, did not check up or just were interested in free links ? How can you guys talk about top nodge shit with not even a logo inserted into the wikis and standard pages not even edited ? Not a single damn complain about logos not being inserted, no check up of the posting time footprint, no nothing…. If you check up the wikis even not being Einstein you will find a hell of footprints which nobody mentioned in his review. A random check of just 2 wikis will show same registrants. Given the facts both are well known, respected and seem to know their shit, I really would like to get an opinion from them about this and maybe some response about SERP movement too as I personally doubt this Wiki shit will have any positive impact and I also doubt the BLA really creates a longterm boost for your site. I’d simply love to hear some feedback from especially Grindstone about the impacts the BLA and the Wikis had on his sites… I am asking this as I have heard from several contacts who purchased this package (the BLA) and the wiki package that they have seen no results at all or had negative experience but not a single shit in onthewayup’s threads is posted about that. For me it seems this package creates some positive impact for the very first but drops value even faster after the footprints got picked up by Google and lots of moodle tickets get deleted or even better, like in my case, get indexed with a 100% duplicate content having your link in it.
If anybody needs a prove for what I am explaining here, hit me up in PM and you’ll get lots of proves. I really can just recommend to everybody who purchased a BLA package or a Wiki package to check up about content and footprints and you’ll get the same results which are far from what you expected.
You don't believe me, CHECK YOUR OWN ORDERS
Honestly, i'm going to just try my best and state some things here since I know why you posted this, especially after you seemed very nice to give me a little advice about my wikis the other day, now you completely turned on me. So here's what I'm going to do to help with duplicate content, but honestly i'm really sorry you feel this way.
1. We tried our best to keep the content readable while spinning the content. Each word throughout each article is spun twice, but when you're spinning one article 400 times, such as with the moodle/ticket articles, it becomes duplicate.
2. The package has been working, and still works even if everything you say is true. My sites from 6 months back still have their very same ranking as they did when I tested them with the BLA package, so as far as rankings slipping, I would have to investigate your site to find the true problem, as I highly doubt its due to the package.
3. The way we'll get around this is simple: We will offer the option to choose whether you care or don't care about the readablity. That way, we can spin it at a much higher rate, but it won't be readable - therefore the duplicate content won't be an issue, unless you rather have readable content.
That's the only problem with spun content. You're have two edges of the sword: Either you make it readable, or you spin it until it's not readable anymore. Creating the BLA package with all unique articles would cause the price to increase dramatically, and we were trying to keep the price down while providing results, which we have done time and time again.
Once again, I'm sorry you feel that way, but I do feel stabbed in the back after our conversation on Skype. Either way, we'll offer the choice starting today to clients who rather have it spun at 100%, and clients that want readable content.
Either way, I'm sorry you feel like this, and wish you would have contacted me, since you know I would have made it right. Either way, no hard feelings.
1. We tried our best to keep the content readable while spinning the content. Each word throughout each article is spun twice, but when you're spinning one article 400 times, such as with the moodle/ticket articles, it becomes duplicate.
2. The package has been working, and still works even if everything you say is true. My sites from 6 months back still have their very same ranking as they did when I tested them with the BLA package, so as far as rankings slipping, I would have to investigate your site to find the true problem, as I highly doubt its due to the package.
3. The way we'll get around this is simple: We will offer the option to choose whether you care or don't care about the readablity. That way, we can spin it at a much higher rate, but it won't be readable - therefore the duplicate content won't be an issue, unless you rather have readable content.
That's the only problem with spun content. You're have two edges of the sword: Either you make it readable, or you spin it until it's not readable anymore. Creating the BLA package with all unique articles would cause the price to increase dramatically, and we were trying to keep the price down while providing results, which we have done time and time again.
Once again, I'm sorry you feel that way, but I do feel stabbed in the back after our conversation on Skype. Either way, we'll offer the choice starting today to clients who rather have it spun at 100%, and clients that want readable content.
Either way, I'm sorry you feel like this, and wish you would have contacted me, since you know I would have made it right. Either way, no hard feelings.
- Status