Apple Engineer Talks About the New MacBook

Or just stay away from overpriced trendy shit in general (Apple).

What??? You saying it's not a wise choice to take 2 days off work, while sleeping on the side walk to be one of the first to buy the latest iPhone?

That's just crazy talk.
 


What??? You saying it's not a wise choice to take 2 days off work, while sleeping on the side walk to be one of the first to buy the latest iPhone?

That's just crazy talk.

Common... You should hire some high-school kid for that. Use your businessman senses man.
This way you can keep working to pay him off.
 
For anyone wondering, here is the translation:

"he had a job at a restaurant in a place called chipiona. he was washing dishes until two in the morning. he then had to clean 20 paella pans, which are large pans used to make a native dish called paella, and he couldn't because they were really moldy and because his back hurt. he went to the beach, when the tide was low, and he left the pans in the water after securing them to the beach so that the salt from the water would kill the mold and clean the pans. the chef later called him six hours later to go back to the beach and retrieve the pans. when he went back, the tide had risen a lot and most of the pans were gone. he only found one pan that was stuck in the rocks. after receiving his salary, with a lot of deductions used to pay for the pans, he left and never worked in the kitchen again." 
 
Or just stay away from overpriced trendy shit in general (Apple).

Are Macbook Airs overpriced compared to their Windows-based equivalents? That's a serious question.

I'm thinking of getting an Air. It's $899 + $100 for 4GB extra RAM. Can you think of any Windows laptops that offer the same specs and battery life (up to 12 hrs) at less than 3 lbs.?

I've been looking, but I can't find any that match the reviews I've seen for the Mac Air.
 
Are Macbook Airs overpriced compared to their Windows-based equivalents? That's a serious question.

I'm thinking of getting an Air. It's $899 + $100 for 4GB extra RAM. Can you think of any Windows laptops that offer the same specs and battery life (up to 12 hrs) at less than 3 lbs.?

I've been looking, but I can't find any that match the reviews I've seen for the Mac Air.

It is really hard to find other laptop with the same exact specs. It usually goes something like - over 3lbs, but much better specs and better price or something like that. It is hard to match every spec by spec. You have to look at the whole picture, if you need it to be spec by spec, it may be hard to find.
 
It is really hard to find other laptop with the same exact specs. It usually goes something like - over 3lbs, but much better specs and better price or something like that. It is hard to match every spec by spec. You have to look at the whole picture, if you need it to be spec by spec, it may be hard to find.

Thanks super.

The most important aspects for me are weight, battery, RAM and price. I'm looking for a sub-3-lb. machine with 8 GB RAM that can last more than 10 hours under "normal" use (browser + 2 or 3 programs) around $1,000.

The Air seems to hit the mark. I'm still looking for Win machines that can do it.
 
I never heard of Win laptop under $1K with 10 hours battery life.
I use Asus V550 and imo it gets as close to Apple Air as it gets, but it delivers only ~4 hours battery life...
 
The Macbook has a USB-c port which sounds like a nice thing (for the future) except for the fact that current USB devices can't fit into it! So it's only backward compatible with a $70 dongle. That's pretty lame. If they're going to do something like that they should throw in a free dongle at least. I mean what devices currently use USB-c.. like none.

Yes, this is my biggest source of rage. USB means Universal Serial Bus.

It's right fucking there in the name "Universal" meaning USB 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 can all be plugged into the same port. USB-c is not universal as nothing plugs into it except USB-c. It's another shitty firewire port all over again.

Apple is crapping all over industry standards with proprietary port bullshit and claiming to be leading hardware development. All they're really doing is raping wallets with a non-universal port.
 
Yes, this is my biggest source of rage. USB means Universal Serial Bus.

It's right fucking there in the name "Universal" meaning USB 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 can all be plugged into the same port. USB-c is not universal as nothing plugs into it except USB-c. It's another shitty firewire port all over again.

Apple is crapping all over industry standards with proprietary port bullshit and claiming to be leading hardware development. All they're really doing is raping wallets with a non-universal port.

USB - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You act as if none of these exist already.
 
Yes, this is my biggest source of rage. USB means Universal Serial Bus.

It's right fucking there in the name "Universal" meaning USB 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 can all be plugged into the same port. USB-c is not universal as nothing plugs into it except USB-c. It's another shitty firewire port all over again.

Apple is crapping all over industry standards with proprietary port bullshit and claiming to be leading hardware development. All they're really doing is raping wallets with a non-universal port.

"Universal" has nothing to do with the geometry of the plug, it refers to the serial bus being universally used for any peripheral imaginable.

If laptops are to get thinner, they can't have full sized USB ports. USB type-C is thinner and the plug is reversible, thank fuck. If Apple didn't push for change like this, nobody else will.


USB-plug-in-problems.jpg
 
Apple is crapping all over industry standards with proprietary port bullshit and claiming to be leading hardware development. All they're really doing is raping wallets with a non-universal port.

Oh actually upon further research, IT IS THE INDUSTRY STANDARD and Apple didn't invent it, but did contribute. Nice one idiot.

"All told, Apple contributed 18 of 79 named engineers listed on the connector certification project or under 23%. "

apple-invent-usb-c.png
 
USB - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You act as if none of these exist already.

If this was just another micro USB that would be fine. But if they're going to market it as some new USB standard to replace USB 3.0 then that's not cool... it just smacks of a firewire failure all over again.

If laptops are to get thinner, they can't have full sized USB ports.

Fuck all the thin laptop faggotry. Making laptops thinner doesn't mean dick to me. I'm not some limp wrist homo that would snap my wrist if I carried an extra ounce of computer weight with me.

Seriously, I'd rather see progress on some cool tech like holographic projectors than making this year's laptop 1mm thinner.

the plug is reversible, thank fuck.

If you're too retarded to plug a USB in right side up, I feel bad for you son.
 
Shit I remember when Apple dropped floppy disk drives from their desktops and people were like WTF is wrong with Apple?
 
Common... You should hire some high-school kid for that. Use your businessman senses man.
This way you can keep working to pay him off.

Or just don't rush out yelling, "i'll sleep on the side walk if you take my money!" every time Apple releases a new product. That could work too. :)

Gotta admit though, bit jelly of Apple. "I'm not taking your money until Tuesday at 9am, god damnit!", so thousands of people sleep on the street in huge anticipation to give me their money. That would be great!
 
If laptops are to get thinner, they can't have full sized USB ports.

Bullshit. A regular sized USB plug is 4mm thick and requires maybe 1mm more of solid support structure top and bottom, thinner than any device save for the very thinnest phones. A micro USB is 2.5mm thick and can be easily accommodated in any device for years to come. Device thinness can only go so far. In addition, a regular sized USB plug is perfectly viable without it's outer housing, and in that case is about 2mm thick. USB-C is completely unnecessary and is simply an opportunity for device manufacturers (primarily Apple) to sell a mountain of $60 adapters.

Now who'e the idiot exactly?
 
Actually, after further reading I take back some of what I said. While the above conversation seemed to be about size and some people's inability to plug a USB cable in the right way (derp). The more important points about USB Type-C are it's data transfer speeds and power supply capabilities. It can transfer at up to 20gb/s and can provide 100w of power (vs 5gb/s and 10w for current USB 3 specs). It's the same size as a mini USB 3 plug, so there's no advantage there, but it's much more capable in the data transfer and device charging departments. Of course there's going to still be that painful transition phase as it's not reverse compatible like USB 1-3 was, so there's still going to be a lot of adapters sold.
 
Actually, after further reading I take back some of what I said. While the above conversation seemed to be about size and some people's inability to plug a USB cable in the right way (derp). The more important points about USB Type-C are it's data transfer speeds and power supply capabilities. It can transfer at up to 20gb/s and can provide 100w of power (vs 5gb/s and 10w for current USB 3 specs). It's the same size as a mini USB 3 plug, so there's no advantage there, but it's much more capable in the data transfer and device charging departments. Of course there's going to still be that painful transition phase as it's not reverse compatible like USB 1-3 was, so there's still going to be a lot of adapters sold.

Don't be blinded by the specs. Firewire had better specs when it was first released too.

This isn't anything that a USB 4.0 couldn't keep up with. Personally, I'd like to see it go that way instead of these special snowflake ports. I've got some USB devices that are over 10 years old and being able to plug them into my computer now or another 10 years from now without a tangled mass of adapters brings me much comfort.