Anyone Using Link Emperor?

Yeah, regarding the article submissions we currently require our vendors to produce the articles. However, we've had a lot of requests for people to be able to use their own articles with related content, so although it's not rolled out yet, Kevin has already developed an articles tab that integrates with Article Builder (Jonathan Leger's new product) that automatically creates and spins a high-quality article from one of various niches. It's really awesome. So you'll be able to decide if you want to upload your own or auto-create them from within the dashboard.

Our goal is to never require you to manually run or do anything once you've got your campaigns set up. It's the ultimate lazy SEO tool.

TylerDurden - Regarding small packages, lol, there are different default allocations depending on what plan you're on, but you can always allocate to anything that you want. So yes, if you were on the 30,000 a month plan and you chose to allocate some of your credits towards that Gripex deal, you'd end up saving up credits for 2 months every so often. Obviously that would be stupid, so we make a different default allocation for the smaller plans than the larger ones, and we try to fit in more of the cheaper link building so you're still getting a solid rotation of links throughout the month. The larger plans get some of the more credit-intensive services tossed into the default allocation, because some of those get you a better effective price per link, so they're a better deal overall, but would be too expensive for a smaller plan since you'd only get one or two blasts in a month.

Gripex's deal isn't in any of the default allocations though, because it's too expensive. We have an internal link checking tool that finds how many links are successful with the proper anchor text etc, and then compares that with the overall cost of the blasts to determine who's been the best deal over a trailing 2-week period. Then the default allocation will change automatically in order to try to get you the best deal. If a service is considered to be too expensive compared to the others, it won't make the cut.

This has helped us in the past, because you'd be surprised at the difference in quality between one link provider and another, even when they're promising the same exact service. We can figure it out very quickly when people are underperforming and cut them out. We allow people to change their allocations if they want though obviously -- this all applies solely to the default allocation. You can always check to see what it currently is, and build a custom allocation with those service percentages in mind.

Hope that helps,

Bobby
 


I've used this service so far (Kahn plan) for 2 months on 3 different sites. I've seen excellent ranking boosts on my 2 new sites. For my 3rd site which is already really competitive I hit a ceiling and couldn't seem to go much higher. However, I did get a single position bump which tripled income for that keyword, and 2 bumps on another keyword.
 
I jumped in today and will start reporting results when I kick off the campaigns tonight. I'm going to put in my 50 most important URLs and start with there. Most will be on two sites, and the rest between a few important URLs on other sites.
 
I've used this service so far (Kahn plan) for 2 months on 3 different sites. I've seen excellent ranking boosts on my 2 new sites. For my 3rd site which is already really competitive I hit a ceiling and couldn't seem to go much higher. However, I did get a single position bump which tripled income for that keyword, and 2 bumps on another keyword.

Great news! Glad to hear you are getting excellent results with the system! Let us know if there is anything we can do to help.


Yours in Service,


Brett Phillips
Customer Support Specialist
 
I jumped in today and will start reporting results when I kick off the campaigns tonight. I'm going to put in my 50 most important URLs and start with there. Most will be on two sites, and the rest between a few important URLs on other sites.

Hi Berto!

Congats on your decision to join us! I look forward to hearing your results! Please don't hesitate to contact me at the support desk if there is anything I can do!


Yours in Service,


Brett Phillips
Customer Support Specialist
 
We do allow adult sites. Once we roll out some of our internal networks, we'll have to have separate networks for the adult and gambling sites, but for now all of our link building services can accept any types of sites. We should always fully support any type of site.

Berto, feel free to hit me up if you'd like me to take a personal look at your account and make sure you're set up optimally.

Bobby
 
OK well since we have followers, I'm going to set one URL at a pretty high ratio and do NOTHING else to it. It's on a pretty sweet PR4 domain I bought, 8800 local exact matches, and SerpIQ average is 46.

Starting Rank: 38.

I'm using this URL because I honestly don't understand WTF this stuff is (some herb) and don't care enough to buy other links at it. I'm going to make it the center of a silo on that site over time, so it does have a sitewide link to it, which is getting it the 38 ranking so far.

#1 is Wikipedia (SerpIQ 56) and #2 is some crazy site homepage with the keyword in it at SerpIQ = 78. Rounding out the Top 10 are some loserish EMDs and some other low quality pages. I want the EMPEROR to get this to #3.
 
We do allow adult sites. Once we roll out some of our internal networks, we'll have to have separate networks for the adult and gambling sites, but for now all of our link building services can accept any types of sites. We should always fully support any type of site.

Berto, feel free to hit me up if you'd like me to take a personal look at your account and make sure you're set up optimally.

Bobby

I was going to try your service but after hearing it's open to adult and gambling sites, I decided not to do because my visitors are kids. Can you let us know what types of links are not going to be placed near (or with) adult ones?
 
Allright kids, I got 50 landers locked and loaded.

Comments:
- I wish Alexander plan had 75 landers. The pricing structure seems a bit TOO skewed in favor of the big package, but I don't need a zillion. Not a big deal, I'll still be upgrading if it works.
- The SEO Trouble Spots is awesome! It found a site that I don't have a privacy policy page listed, and another site where 301 redirecting isn't happening from non-www entries.

Regarding SEO Trouble Spots, I hope this looks at every lander as well. It would be sweet to double check that every page has the keyword somewhere in H1/H2/H3/em/strong/alt and not too high of density and only one H1 tag which comes first. Not sure how good it is, I'm pretty anal about my on-page SEO so maybe it does check that and I'm batting 1,000 on that stuff. But I doubt it.

After 10 minutes paid service, I'm still stuck at #38 for the keyword we're watching. Major disappointment! ;)

Anyway, another one we're watching is a homepage currently ranking #97. New domain, 9900 exact matches, SerpIQ CI of 52, 30 pages of quality, related content, and a fucking beautiful site if I do say so myself.

This URL is getting a bit more link attention from me, but not much - on this site I'm actually focusing on an easier sub-page that's about a specific product so I can have the site make me some bank sooner than later.
 
I was going to try your service but after hearing it's open to adult and gambling sites, I decided not to do because my visitors are kids. Can you let us know what types of links are not going to be placed near (or with) adult ones?

If you are concerned about the types of sites your links are going to be placed on, you can go to Link Building > Service Allocations > Change Link Building Service Allocations and choose "Clean Link Sources Only" ... We don't use this ourselves because we don't think it makes any difference, but it's there for people who have clients that they don't want to show links from adult sites, etc.

The reason we don't care is because if all I had to do to harm my competitors was build a few adult links to them, then that would be a lot easier than trying to build a lot of quality links to my own sites. Google obviously knows that, and many of the biggest link providers advertised on SEO forums (particularly forum profile creators using Xrumer) have no problem building links on adult sites. If it were a real issue, they'd just prune their lists to remove those.

Bobby
 
Signed up for the Napoleon plan last night, gotta give this a try for myself... (Can't let Berto have all the fun.) Only problem now is finding time to put my hundreds of sites in... To target a couple of landers each is going to take some real time and work on my part, but I can easily see how it will be worth it in time.

I agree with Berto that the on-page stuff is very handy. It certainly doesn't go deep like SerpIQ and lots of SEO suite software does, but if you're dealing with multiple sites to promote than the level it does go into is just right.

The reason we don't care is because if all I had to do to harm my competitors was build a few adult links to them, then that would be a lot easier than trying to build a lot of quality links to my own sites. Google obviously knows that, and many of the biggest link providers advertised on SEO forums (particularly forum profile creators using Xrumer) have no problem building links on adult sites. If it were a real issue, they'd just prune their lists to remove those.
Since you guys launched this as a WSO I'll forgive you for not knowing this; but around Wickedfire you don't need to explain this kind of stuff. It's too elementary for just about everyone here. We constantly make fun of the WaFo mindset, in fact.

I think you'd do best explaining Link Emperor to WickedFire folk as thus:

1. It is the front-end of a marketplace of well-tested Backlinks for all types of link properties...

2. That Automatically deploy strategically to all of the individual landers you care about...

3. Using longtail keywords that we help you find automatically and rank the importance of, all hands free.

-This concept is something that would appeal to many here... As it is I think most of us see your WSO and bounce because you've had to dumb it down so far. Hope that helps.
 
My little update is that I'm realizing that at 1,000 credits per day, I'm really not going to get much to spread to 50 landers. So I stopped half of my campaigns.

I'm now targeting 19 landers (included the two that we're watching). I want to bump up the priority on the 2 that we're monitoring, but I can't figure out how to change the "per click value". Might be my browser.

I'm most interested in how this system chooses to use my 1,000 credits per day and how it prioritizes my URLs:
Link Building Marketplace Credits | Link Emperor

If it works it wisely, then I'll have no problem upgrading so that I can hit my 75 or so care-about URLs over time. I don't really need immediate SERP boosts. I'm looking for longevity and diversity to keep my domains alive and well.

I'm sure we could also break out the spreadsheets and see if the rates on the link above are really worth it, but I'm sick of being in analyze and paralyze mode. I need to go produce some stuff, not analyze every last cent. Maybe later.
 
Different types of link building command different numbers of credits per link. But 1 credit will always buy you at least one backlink.

30,000 backlinks a month? I'd have no problem sending that to 50 different pages.
 
30,000 backlinks a month? I'd have no problem sending that to 50 different pages.

$150 for 30,000 xrumer profiles is not a good deal, so not really. I've never been able to automate Web 2.0 creation and random slop I never bother ordering (SENuke style stuff)... if this will work with BLG and LinkPushing to do that, then it's a win for me.
 
$150 for 30,000 xrumer profiles is not a good deal, so not really. I've never been able to automate Web 2.0 creation and random slop I never bother ordering (SENuke style stuff)... if this will work with BLG and LinkPushing to do that, then it's a win for me.
They've got the default set up to go 6% to BacklinkGenie's forum Profiles, and 4% to go to DFB's forum profiles, so that's 10% right there, and sadly it probably overlaps a bit.

Since I have a few old DFB accounts, I decided to rip out all of their forum profiles and social bookmarking links and allocate those percentage points to things like blog posts, .gov/.edu links, and G+es. Time will tell, but it seems to be a little ahead of schedule releasing the links for me right now... It's been almost 24 hours and it reports that it has used 170% or so of 1 day's allotment... so it comes in spurts.

Under "Completed blasts" it doesn't show what's done yet, probably because the vendors haven't finished them yet, but under "Credit Transactions it shows me exactly what it sent those credits to. That page looks like a running ledger of your monthly addition of links and the debits out to vendors so far.

So far so good; This shit is running quite smoothly... But like Berto I'm limited in what I can promote so far, and will probably have to upgrade to the Khan account soon anyway for all these landers I want to promote. (Not to mention Campaigns... Really wish we could separate our campaigns far better, but oh well.)