LPLockdown - If You Like Giving Your Pages Away

Status
Not open for further replies.
blogworld2-006.gif
 


why would you ... we read your PM's daily. why is this such a shit storm.

It's not, the sense of indignation here is hilarious, but nicky should lose mod status, not because of some fictional breach of trust (on a message board of all things people get serious) but because now that sig pixels are a no no it would be extremely likely that he would start to abuse mod privileges to keep his product up to date.
 
It's not, the sense of indignation here is hilarious, but nicky should lose mod status, not because of some fictional breach of trust (on a message board of all things people get serious) but because now that sig pixels are a no no it would be extremely likely that he would start to abuse mod privileges to keep his product up to date.
Fact: Wickedfire's database is too fragile to scrape.
 
WP Smart tools never answers my emails and the reason I bought it, that feature doesn't even work. Are you the owner? If so PM me.
lolwhat.

I just noticed this and PMed you. I also checked my email three times to make sure that I hadn't just recently missed something, but no, I've responded to every single email in my WP Smart Tools inbox, with the exception of one called "FREE GAMBLING MONEY ONLINE" which was just spam. :-)

If I'm not receiving your emails, or you're not sending them, feel free to grab me on AIM (wpquickaffiliate) or via PM here.
 
I can form Shell Corporations in UK for so cheap that it is not even funny.

Paying $50 for something that is rendered useless by a $2 payment. Almost good enough to be part of LPLockdown 2.0.

------------------

I don't get why everyone is focusing on the quality of the product or its glorified IP list. Yes, the product is at best useless, you are creating a new footprint, you are exposing your campaigns to someone with rather questionable motives and in return you get to dickroll some Indian schmuck or redirect Wagenheimers WF gang (that is if they manage to actually upload the files). But it's not like anyone here actually has a problem with selling shitty products.

I'm also not sure why everyone is so hung up on the whole IP logging issue: They have less information on you than any site you've visited in the past. There is no way to properly scrub the list and have anywhere near 150k records. The question is not if they have false positives but how many and whether you're only going to lose out on a sale or risk getting your account banned. Oh and the upside? Possibly educating some DP member about the wonders of spinning genitals. Which you get to pay $50 for.

Oh and I particular loved the challenge to split test their list of random IPs vs. not gambling with your account. I'm not really surprised they say they saw no difference whatsoever. The thing is, there is virtually no way that any 150k blacklisted IPs will, not with 1500 MM assigned IPs in the US alone. The numbers would have been the same whether they scrubbed the original list or not.

You are paying Nick $50 a month and taking a gamble on them not jacking your campaign, them not blocking an adwords rep and/or real customer so that at best you are where you would have been without the service. Essentially you are paying someone to drive potential customers to your website and then paying these guys to make sure not all of them get to see it and trusting them to not fuck it up. Brilliant.

But in any case, as Nickycakes said, those that are satisfied with the product haven't posted in the thread, implying either that he has no happy customers or.. Eh, let's not kid ourselves. What I instead want to know is how someone could look at this and actually decide to go ahead with it. I don't see the subscriber base peaking at more than 150 customers. And I'm sure Nick wasn't expecting people to circle jerk over it. Almost looks like someone is desperate for cash. Which ironically I believe he said about Paul back then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gimmedat
^^ Being an Indian myself, I find your reference to "some Indian schmuck" highly offensive and stereotypical, and ignorant.
 
^^ Being an Indian myself, I find your reference to "some Indian schmuck" highly offensive and stereotypical, and ignorant.

Pretend I meant you if that makes you feel better.

Or accept the fact that a lot of DP newbs are Indian selling each other $5 Adsense books with resell rights and thus it kind makes sense.

P.S. Interesting use of stereotypical there.
P.P.S Calling someone ignorant solely because you happened to be of that nationality is rather narrow minded, no? It's almost like the story about the pot and the kettle and stuff.
 
@gopher: Actually, there is less chance of anyone from India falling for it, because most of them have dynamic IPs which change every time they connect.

@mailinatorm: Call him back - say that he is an English schmuck. Problem solved.

Many "popular" guys here had signatures probably meant for IP collection - in one case, it was so obvious to me because the image was of 1*1 size.

Another point: no offense meant to these guys, but: for a while, I thought popeye and hellblazer were jobless guys hired by someone to start controversial threads here, while that guy (the one who hired them) posted in the same page with an image signature, collecting the IPs. I just could not believe that they were real. Took me a while to realize it wasn't so.

If somebody collects my IPs, they will end up with hundreds of proxy IPs, and a few IPs of airports, hotels and other public places. Considering the fact that there are others accessing forums like me, and considering the dynamic IPs, 150,000 is a possible figure.
Though a significant percentage of those IPs will be useless.
 
There were a lot of other people collecting IPs in this manner. But really what it comes down to: If you had an image in your sig, the apache log file would have all the IPs a specialized system like this would have. We can't ban someone for hosting an image on a platform that supports logging.


Nicky's blog proudly proclaims him to be a "mostly reformed blackhat"...

So what would you propose we do?

I never asked for him to be banned, I just don't think he should be a mod here.

It almost sounds like you're defending what he did, he mined all the ip's here and now is selling a service to block them from other people's landing pages. I wouldn't mind if he was doing it on his own stuff, but seriously come on.


when you say stuff like
Nicky's blog proudly proclaims him to be a "mostly reformed blackhat"...

Does that mean he can stuff affiliate cookies here because he's a reformed blackhat?


Bottom line it's not taking any money out of my pocket. I do feel it is very sketchy though.

I'm not posting in this thread anymore.
 
Paying $50 for something that is rendered useless by a $2 payment. Almost good enough to be part of LPLockdown 2.0.

------------------

What I instead want to know is how someone could look at this and actually decide to go ahead with it. I don't see the subscriber base peaking at more than 150 customers.

For the same reason people go ahead and pay for S&M services!

633817920032413940-sadomasochism.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.