XRumer Service - BlastBank.com - Scheduled Daily Link Building
- Thread starter Octane
- Start date
- Status
I'm on day 2 of my 3 day trial. I'm confused about people who say they are getting 95% anchor text profiles. I spot checked 50 of my most recent blast report, and I had only 25 anchor text profiles, 1 no link, 1 not publicly viewable and 23 were raw links.
Am I doing something wrong?
Am I doing something wrong?
I am impressed by the free demo and I intend to sign up for the paid program late this month. They promise 300 free links per day. But actually the no. of links you get is more than that.
I had a three day trrial from which I should have gotten 900 links. But I actually received close to 2000 links. Something around 1980 links.
The best part is Google has started to index these profile links. And they are getting cached. I recommend BlastBank for all.
You could go a few steps further and also have your links indexed with the help of a few autoblogs that are constantly being cached by Google.
I'd give the service a 9/10 because they over deliver. I'd give a 10/10 to a service that also ensures indexing (by building links to profile). But I'm sure none of the other services do that.
Moreover, BlastBank is the cheapest drip feed blasting service available.
I had a three day trrial from which I should have gotten 900 links. But I actually received close to 2000 links. Something around 1980 links.
The best part is Google has started to index these profile links. And they are getting cached. I recommend BlastBank for all.
You could go a few steps further and also have your links indexed with the help of a few autoblogs that are constantly being cached by Google.
I'd give the service a 9/10 because they over deliver. I'd give a 10/10 to a service that also ensures indexing (by building links to profile). But I'm sure none of the other services do that.
Moreover, BlastBank is the cheapest drip feed blasting service available.
Fck Guerrila...competition is good + he set higher prices and about the quality ... no comments... i wouldnt have paid even 20$ for his biggest package.
I spot checked my links again today, my third day of the trial, and again - half or less were anchor text links.
Is this the norm or is there something wrong with my setup? What are others doing to get 95% anchor text links?
Is this the norm or is there something wrong with my setup? What are others doing to get 95% anchor text links?
Review Time:
First, I've used DFB for a wHile so I have a reference. I actually started a thread about it here: http://www.wickedfire.com/traffic-content/106572-my-current-drip-feed-blast-plan.html
Ok, I let all of my links sit for a few days before checking them out to help get a picture how sticky these links are. Combined all 3 trial days worth together and got the following data:
- 1555 profile attempts. (only supposed to get 900, so awesome over delivery)
- 1374 successful profiles
- 113 of these were duplicate domains ( That is on par with DFB)
Of those 1374 profiles, 684 had my link with an anchor text. Right about half.
Next I run those successful links with my anchor to check domain PR. I check the only ones that I care about and get the following
- 6 PR5 links
- 5 PR4 links
- 48 PR3 links. For a total of 70 links
I run the non-anchored links to find anything of value and find a PR8 link, a few PR7's and a couple of .edu.xx links. (I guess they count more than regular links even with the .xx at the end)??
I add those to my high PR anchored links and get 76 links that I will work on getting indexed. These anchors are all diverse and are on que with my long-tail plan from the link above.
My final verdict: A+. Honestly, and I don't really even like saying this, but I think this is a little better service then DFB. I personally believe that there seems to be a little more link diversity and better pr links. This is NOT fact and it is NOT documented. This is just from what i happened to have paid attention to.
As for the argument of blastbank ripping off DFB? Totally 100% copied. But... This is a business, and in business there is going to be competition. This service is basically just the same as all the generic brands found in all supermarkets. If something is working, someone will come along and do it for cheaper. I don't think Guerrilla would disagree with me (although I don't know the guy), i'm sure he expected it at some time.
I'm confident that this will create better competition and someone will come out with a improved product (indexing help or a pinger guys?)
Cheers
First, I've used DFB for a wHile so I have a reference. I actually started a thread about it here: http://www.wickedfire.com/traffic-content/106572-my-current-drip-feed-blast-plan.html
Ok, I let all of my links sit for a few days before checking them out to help get a picture how sticky these links are. Combined all 3 trial days worth together and got the following data:
- 1555 profile attempts. (only supposed to get 900, so awesome over delivery)
- 1374 successful profiles
- 113 of these were duplicate domains ( That is on par with DFB)
Of those 1374 profiles, 684 had my link with an anchor text. Right about half.
Next I run those successful links with my anchor to check domain PR. I check the only ones that I care about and get the following
- 6 PR5 links
- 5 PR4 links
- 48 PR3 links. For a total of 70 links
I run the non-anchored links to find anything of value and find a PR8 link, a few PR7's and a couple of .edu.xx links. (I guess they count more than regular links even with the .xx at the end)??
I add those to my high PR anchored links and get 76 links that I will work on getting indexed. These anchors are all diverse and are on que with my long-tail plan from the link above.
My final verdict: A+. Honestly, and I don't really even like saying this, but I think this is a little better service then DFB. I personally believe that there seems to be a little more link diversity and better pr links. This is NOT fact and it is NOT documented. This is just from what i happened to have paid attention to.
As for the argument of blastbank ripping off DFB? Totally 100% copied. But... This is a business, and in business there is going to be competition. This service is basically just the same as all the generic brands found in all supermarkets. If something is working, someone will come along and do it for cheaper. I don't think Guerrilla would disagree with me (although I don't know the guy), i'm sure he expected it at some time.
I'm confident that this will create better competition and someone will come out with a improved product (indexing help or a pinger guys?)
Cheers
Review
Very interesting product, I have tried the demo and never having experience with Xrumer I found it quite easy to use, check my links and setup daily blasts.
I have tried a blast for each property and they didn't get indexed yet, but looking at number of links (and it's been only done over the weekend and now is Monday) I am quite confident that they will.
Hopefully I'll get to try it for a few more days and if it helps my articles and web 2.0's in getting cached, I will get the basic account to run further tests.
Very interesting product, I have tried the demo and never having experience with Xrumer I found it quite easy to use, check my links and setup daily blasts.
I have tried a blast for each property and they didn't get indexed yet, but looking at number of links (and it's been only done over the weekend and now is Monday) I am quite confident that they will.
Hopefully I'll get to try it for a few more days and if it helps my articles and web 2.0's in getting cached, I will get the basic account to run further tests.
My Review:
Well I just got on my 3rd day and i can see that I am getting tons of links from this. They overdeliver by 100-200 just about everyday and more than half have correct anchor text and the quality is very high! I would recommend this for sure. I am just waiting for some of them to index to see what it does to my serps, but I shouldnt have a problem!
Well I just got on my 3rd day and i can see that I am getting tons of links from this. They overdeliver by 100-200 just about everyday and more than half have correct anchor text and the quality is very high! I would recommend this for sure. I am just waiting for some of them to index to see what it does to my serps, but I shouldnt have a problem!
3 Day Trial Review
I cannot give an accurate comparison to DFB since I have never used their service, but I have outsourced xrumer blasts before.
User Interface: I setup 3 different campaigns using BlastBank's user friendly interface. Everything was very straightforward, no problems setting things up. It features a weekly blast schedule, simple & combined blast campaigns, and blast history.
Blast: The results from the campaigns included everything I expect from an xrumer blast. Link diversity and proper anchor text were apparent in each of the results. The usernames could be less spammy. It consists of <real name><random letters>, e.g. johnnyfjksd. Perhaps using random numbers or <real name><0-999><a-z> would be a better option. Over delivered on the blast by about 200 links. Blasts were done to secondary links only, none to main money site.
SERPs: I tested blasts on two of my sites.
-First site: 2 of the blasts were on my site which is aged 6 months and I am seeing positive serp movement. I already had it on the first page for 3 keywords: Rank 2/3, Rank 8, Rank 4. Since the blast I have seen it bounce around but never go down a rank. As of today I am Rank 2, Rank 7, Rank 4, which I consider my "real" ranks. When signed out of my account I am Rank 2, Rank 2, Rank 1.
-Second site: Aged for 2 months. Before blast I was rank ~50. Day after blast rank 28, following day rank 19. Very satisfied with these results. I did do a bit of manual link building prior to the day of the blast but haven't seen significant jumps links this with this site.
Conclusion: Overall I am very satisfied with the service. The prices are competitive and it's worth every penny. I still feel I need more time/daily blasts with this service to test the overall effectiveness of the blasts on my SERPs. As long as the link database is built and maintained properly I see this being an excellent service for drip feed xrumer blasts to your sites. I will be subscribing assuming the extended 7 days goes just as well as the 3 day trial.
I cannot give an accurate comparison to DFB since I have never used their service, but I have outsourced xrumer blasts before.
User Interface: I setup 3 different campaigns using BlastBank's user friendly interface. Everything was very straightforward, no problems setting things up. It features a weekly blast schedule, simple & combined blast campaigns, and blast history.
Blast: The results from the campaigns included everything I expect from an xrumer blast. Link diversity and proper anchor text were apparent in each of the results. The usernames could be less spammy. It consists of <real name><random letters>, e.g. johnnyfjksd. Perhaps using random numbers or <real name><0-999><a-z> would be a better option. Over delivered on the blast by about 200 links. Blasts were done to secondary links only, none to main money site.
SERPs: I tested blasts on two of my sites.
-First site: 2 of the blasts were on my site which is aged 6 months and I am seeing positive serp movement. I already had it on the first page for 3 keywords: Rank 2/3, Rank 8, Rank 4. Since the blast I have seen it bounce around but never go down a rank. As of today I am Rank 2, Rank 7, Rank 4, which I consider my "real" ranks. When signed out of my account I am Rank 2, Rank 2, Rank 1.
-Second site: Aged for 2 months. Before blast I was rank ~50. Day after blast rank 28, following day rank 19. Very satisfied with these results. I did do a bit of manual link building prior to the day of the blast but haven't seen significant jumps links this with this site.
Conclusion: Overall I am very satisfied with the service. The prices are competitive and it's worth every penny. I still feel I need more time/daily blasts with this service to test the overall effectiveness of the blasts on my SERPs. As long as the link database is built and maintained properly I see this being an excellent service for drip feed xrumer blasts to your sites. I will be subscribing assuming the extended 7 days goes just as well as the 3 day trial.
I've used datafeed blast in the past but stopped since their price increase (didn't get to renew in time)
The interface is certainly similar but that hardly surprising since they are offering a similar service, the pricing is certainly very competitive and if they constantly over-deliver like they did on my trial (supposed to be 300 links per day for 3 days I got 1900 in total) then I will be subscribing.
I sent all my blasts to web 2.0 properties then linking to my main site and about 80% of links are still in place 2 weeks later.
Good to see some competition for DFB
The interface is certainly similar but that hardly surprising since they are offering a similar service, the pricing is certainly very competitive and if they constantly over-deliver like they did on my trial (supposed to be 300 links per day for 3 days I got 1900 in total) then I will be subscribing.
I sent all my blasts to web 2.0 properties then linking to my main site and about 80% of links are still in place 2 weeks later.
Good to see some competition for DFB
- Status