T I probably already said enough to ruin some credibility.
Lose credibility or gain credibility?
The masses will always fail to question anything beyond the obvious....they wanted to burn Copernicus for saying the world was round because anyone who duh looks at is sees the world is flat. They wanted to put Marconi in the nut house because he said "I've found a way to transfer voice through the ether" (radio early in the last century). They told Swedenborg he was ape shit crazy about 200 years ago when he designed a "flying machine". They wanted to put Tesla away because he wanted to give away free electricity harnessed from the ionosphere....
The list goes on....
Anyway, Jack Houck a Univ. of Michigan trained engineer and Boeing exec has done research on this sort of thing.
You may find it interesting.
Jack Houck - MENTAL ACCESS WINDOW
Keep in mind this is not a quack but a guy who was personally asked by the CEO of Boeing to do research and worked for the FBI investigating this phenomena.
None of this stuff is crazy when you read about quantum physics. If everything and everyone is connected through a sort of information super highway sort of like how energy from the sun though invisible can be felt from far away, this stuff seems reasonable. Of course more research needs to be done but it's not at all unreasonable.....
Brian Josephson does research on stuff like this. None of the closed minded skeptics can touch him.
Why? He's a fellow/aka professor tenured at Cambridge University ala Newton's almer mater.
He's a fucking genius - he won a Nobel Prize in HIS TWENTIES for a phenomena that affects alot of electronic products called "The Josephson Effect".
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7sI0H6Mo2Y"]YouTube - Can Physicists' Description of Reality be Considered Complete? (1 of 3)[/ame]
Nobel Prize laureate and Professor Brian Josephson is director of the Mind-Matter Unification Project of the Theory of Condensed Matter Group at the Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, a project concerned primarily with the attempt to understand, from the viewpoint of the theoretical physicist, what may loosely be characterised as intelligent processes in nature, associated with brain function or with some other natural process.
People need to do their research and understand how much information is not - ON PURPOSE - being filtered out to the masses. In one book I read written by the head of the UC San Diego Physics department called "Quantum Enigma" - the author's colleague was quoted as saying
"Though what you're saying is correct, presenting this material to nonscientists is the intellectual equivalent of allowing children to play with loaded guns..."
Think about it from an IM perspective. All those biz ops offers going out now that people are out of work saying "make money getting people to click on ads with google" (adsense)
For those of you lucky few who knew about the power of stuff early on, would you rush out and tell people. Think about how many people now out of work when they first heard about adsense thought it was some big scam (some still do....it always makes me smile when I go to the bank and the teller says you have a deposit from um Google while I heard about that...lol)
Same thing with any powerful info. It takes (it's said) about 10 years - sometimes 50! - for information to filter from the science labs to what's accepted as reality by the masses....
Photonic computing is another example. This is only possible because on the quantum scale something can be a two places at the same time or communicate nonlocally.
Try getting the average peon on the street to actually believe that....
Anyway, I'll stop sounding so impatient and go back to work, hehe
Tx for sharing....