Why, because of some bullshit story?
To paraphrase what I've read a few times over the last couple of days: Billionaire has been surrounded by beautiful women for 40 years with zero charges of sexual assault until October 2011. Sounds legit.
And this is not to mention that the NY Times article is shoddy, within 24 hours it began falling apart - and without internet sleuths it would stand unchallenged.
Evidence Grows the New York Times Hit Piece On Trump Is A Hoax - Hidden Americans
https://i.sli.mg/yt6cmL.jpg
Yesterday there was a swift change to Trump's message - I think he's been tipped for something big by Wikileaks.
![]()
The news stations (and this 100% includes Fox News, which is actively anti-Trump and losing viewers) are on Trump-as-serial-predator 24/7 - when, in light of everything else, it isn't much of a story at all.
Meanwhile Wikileaks is proving Trump's new and very clear message to be true - that corporate media is about advocacy, not journalism.
All of it makes me go back to what Assange said at the outset - that he has the goods on Clinton that will not only cost her the White House, but put her in a jail cell. A lot of things changed over the past 48 hours, I don't think it's coincidental.
If wikileaks really has something that will put her in a jail cell, then I completely agree with you that Trump can win this. But right now, Trump is fending off women coming out accusing him of sexually harassing them. You can dismiss them as opportunists looking for fame, but unless there is some real big dirt against Clinton like you say there will be, it's going to be a very rough campaign for Trump.