Trump for US President?

Thoughts on the leaked audio of Trump talking to Billy Bush? Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...4-11e6-bf8a-3d26847eeed4_story.html?tid=sm_tw Also Trump's statement on it is included there too.

I'm not a man so maybe I'm totally wrong but seems like the kind of bragging locker room type of talk that a lot of men might engage in when talking to a male friend in privacy. You should hear what women talk about when no men are around. I'd like to hear regular men's opinion of it, not a media or political figure's take on it as they have every reason to distance themselves from that type of talk.

My own opinion, though admittedly limited by my inability to understand fully the male mind, is that he was bragging, bonding. And as crude as it was, I think too that he is at a disadvantage because career politicians learn early on to be guarded, while Trump lived most of his adult life outside of politics. At the time this audio was recorded Trump was just a business guy and a TV personality, making connections and deals is different than winning votes or being presidential.

I have women that I have made business deals with as well as women that have worked for me and with me. Being candid and letting other people take you into their confidence is a powerful tool. I had a white label deal I wanted to close recently, the woman is going through a nasty divorce and so I hope those tapes never come out in any future election bid because this woman told me every intimate detail of her husband's erectile dysfunction and all about her new much younger lover, and you'd hear me throughout laughing, sympathizing and egging her on. And not because I agreed necessarily with her decisions or morals but because I know that if she trusts me and likes me on a personal level then she is more likely to do business with me. People are partial like that. Sometimes to get the ball rolling you have to be the first one to close the distance, with women that's pretty easy, slip in a reference to men, good or bad and soon most women will be talking your ear off and telling you all the details of their private lives. Then you just follow their lead and before you know it you are their best friend and of course they want to do deals with you, favors for you, they take an active interest in seeing you succeed.

And maybe all of that sounds like manipulation, maybe it sounds like an asshole move. But that really depends on your end game, is it an asshole move to help someone have the confidence to make a decision that you know will benefit them financially or otherwise? I say no.

So that was my take of the audio, Trump was trying to be disarming, trying to bring the other guy into mutual confidence. I thought he went too fast, did too much of the talking himself but that's my best guess. What do you guys think about it? Do you think America in general is going to be as appalled by the audio as the news media and politicians seem to be? (Some of the media he is "advocating sexual assault" in the tape which I think is a pretty far reach)

I may have 99 problems with Trump but this tape, at least for me, was not one.
 


Trump won that debate dispite MSM claiming its a Hillary win.

I decided to watch the debate because there was a tirade of negative MSM press about Donald and how his campaign is imploding.

He seems to have taken advice from Nigel, where is bring the topic back to the important issues. He has also unleashed attacks on Hillary's emails, 30 years of talk and no action, etc. This was important to shift from the constant defensive position.

Hillary used so much of her fake smiling this time that it backfired rather than demonstrate how composured she is.
 
hilltrump-debate_large.jpg


molehill_large.jpg
 
I think Trump's lewd recordings will alienate him from many swing state and undecided voters that he badly needs. Yes I know Bill Clinton is an infamous womanizer too, but he wasn't caught with a recording that pretty much says you can force yourself on women if you are a star. That's going to rub a lot of people the wrong way.

In contrasts the Clinton Foundation allegations, the illegal destruction of evidence in the email scandal (Destruction of evidence is a criminal offence, and I think we can both agree that she did it and thus is a criminal), and the Hillary Benghazi scandal are all too abstract to connect with the average lay person voter. They'll consider Hillary the lesser of the two evils. Trump's own support base isn't enough for him to win the election, he needs more voters and right now that's an uphill struggle.

I also don't think Trump's debate performance was that great, albeit it did seem like the moderator was much tougher on Trump than on Clinton. Maybe Trump's performance was a little better than his first debate, but it was still a hot mess.
 
I think Trump's lewd recordings will alienate him from many swing state and undecided voters that he badly needs. Yes I know Bill Clinton is an infamous womanizer too, but he wasn't caught with a recording that pretty much says you can force yourself on women if you are a star. That's going to rub a lot of people the wrong way.

In contrasts the Clinton Foundation allegations, the illegal destruction of evidence in the email scandal (Destruction of evidence is a criminal offence, and I think we can both agree that she did it and thus is a criminal), and the Hillary Benghazi scandal are all too abstract to connect with the average lay person voter. They'll consider Hillary the lesser of the two evils. Trump's own support base isn't enough for him to win the election, he needs more voters and right now that's an uphill struggle.

I also don't think Trump's debate performance was that great, albeit it did seem like the moderator was much tougher on Trump than on Clinton. Maybe Trump's performance was a little better than his first debate, but it was still a hot mess.

The Podesta emails that were just released show that this was the plan from the start, prop up Trump to make sure Clinton runs against the weakest candidate.

otzyyeo.png


http://thefreethoughtproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/150407-Strategy-on-GOP-2016ers-1-1.pdf
 
I think Trump's lewd recordings will alienate him from many swing state and undecided voters that he badly needs. Yes I know Bill Clinton is an infamous womanizer too, but he wasn't caught with a recording that pretty much says you can force yourself on women if you are a star. That's going to rub a lot of people the wrong way.

In contrasts the Clinton Foundation allegations, the illegal destruction of evidence in the email scandal (Destruction of evidence is a criminal offence, and I think we can both agree that she did it and thus is a criminal), and the Hillary Benghazi scandal are all too abstract to connect with the average lay person voter. They'll consider Hillary the lesser of the two evils. Trump's own support base isn't enough for him to win the election, he needs more voters and right now that's an uphill struggle.

I also don't think Trump's debate performance was that great, albeit it did seem like the moderator was much tougher on Trump than on Clinton. Maybe Trump's performance was a little better than his first debate, but it was still a hot mess.

I feel the only undecided voters that will lean toward Trump are those that look beyond the MSM headlines and dig deeper into Hillary's past.

That is why its important for Trump to keep going on the offensive and raise her past failures.
 
If you want the best idea of the election watch South Park this season. Ill make my piece short and sweet.

The political system, which is pretty much a corporate oligarchy at this point, is too fucked to even care about. It is selfish of me to not worry about it, but its my best option.
 
damn they dropping bombs now

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CA06z3qMvbI[/ame]
 
Ouch this is seriously looking bad for Trump.
Why, because of some bullshit story?

To paraphrase what I've read a few times over the last couple of days: Billionaire has been surrounded by beautiful women for 40 years with zero charges of sexual assault until October 2011. Sounds legit.

And this is not to mention that the NY Times article is shoddy, within 24 hours it began falling apart - and without internet sleuths it would stand unchallenged.

Evidence Grows the New York Times Hit Piece On Trump Is A Hoax - Hidden Americans

https://i.sli.mg/yt6cmL.jpg

Yesterday there was a swift change to Trump's message - I think he's been tipped for something big by Wikileaks.

m4on7h.jpg


The news stations (and this 100% includes Fox News, which is actively anti-Trump and losing viewers) are on Trump-as-serial-predator 24/7 - when, in light of everything else, it isn't much of a story at all.

Meanwhile Wikileaks is proving Trump's new and very clear message to be true - that corporate media is about advocacy, not journalism.

All of it makes me go back to what Assange said at the outset - that he has the goods on Clinton that will not only cost her the White House, but put her in a jail cell. A lot of things changed over the past 48 hours, I don't think it's coincidental.