High court strikes down Chicago handgun ban - CNN.com
Good. Good good good. That's all I have to say.
Good. Good good good. That's all I have to say.
Excellent news, hopefully the states still in denial about the correlation between gun ownership and crime rates see the light and stop with their BS regulations.
In dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer predicated far-reaching implications. "Incorporating the right," he wrote, "may change the law in many of the 50 states. Read in the majority's favor, the historical evidence" for the decision "is at most ambiguous."
He was supported by Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor.
![]()
I'm so glad they chose to appoint a mexican woman to help diversify the supreme court rather than picking someone with intelligence and reason.
/affirmative-action-sarcasm
Not exactly, we have a president that saw a great opportunity, and had an AMAZING marketing team (campaign staff). We have few options in terms of reasonable and qualified candidates. </offtopic>. What is amazing is that this will overturn out-right ban on handguns/firearms. Sure you will still have right to bear arm restrictions like NYC, but they can't outright ban our right to protect ourselves.
I love some of the comments..
"When liberals try and take your guns away, that's when you use them."
If you can legalise guns why is your drinking age still 21??
the 21 drinking age is dumb, but what does it have to do with guns at all?
I find it scary that 4 justices of the United States Supreme Court basically voted against the 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution.
I wonder if they will vote against the 1st Amendment too in the future.