SEscout: A SERP tracker specifically for affiliate marketers. Sign up for beta invite

Status
Not open for further replies.
davidb said:
In addition, let's say you tracking more then 10 keyword phrases and you are on page 2, or 10, or whatever. If you click the button to the left in order to see which URL is ranking, then click your back button to get back to the previous page, you are taken to the beginning. So you have to start all over again to get back to the page you were just on (1-clicking the back button, 2 - clicking the domain name to expand the list of keywords 3 - clicking the arrow on the button to go to page two, etc...).

It would also be helpful to have pagination links and/or the ability to display more then 10 keywords on the page.
Click to expand...

I will take this into consideration.
 


All tracking type websites make it a pain to get an overview of your stats. Google analytics, for example, makes you click on each individual domain before you get any useful information. This makes it really hard to get a quick assessment of your standings. The purpose of the SEscout dashboard is to provide a clean and fast way to overview your empire. We really don't want to lose this by adding more and more "features". Because of this, we are creating a detailed report page for each domain. You will have the current dashboard, but each domain will soon have a report link that will take you to all of the information your heard desires including printable (and brandable) reports. This should offer the best of both worlds for those who keep asking for more "stuff".
 
backlinkgurus said:
Because of this, we are creating a detailed report page for each domain. You will have the current dashboard, but each domain will soon have a report link that will take you to all of the information your heard desires including printable (and brandable) reports. This should offer the best of both worlds for those who keep asking for more "stuff".
Click to expand...

I think I love you (In a totally non-gay sort of way, unless we get drunk first with no cameras around :p ).
 
To the next person that requests a bulk import feature, unless you are entirely aware of the current bulk import features and are requesting a DIFFERENT TYPE (style or function wise, please SPECIFY) of said feature, you will be REMOVED from the beta. Bulk imported was one of the first features implemented into SEscout and is readily available from any page on the site.

It is clear some people are simply taking advantage of the program rather then actually going through and trying things out.
 
I just took on a new local SEO client who has a sub-page that outranks the homepage for a keyword. I started building links for the hxxp://www.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.org page but I'm not able track the results of those efforts because the SEscout is only giving me the results for the sub-page.

I'm not really concerned with how the sub-page is ranking since that's not the page I'm building links to. It would be great if there was a way to track the exact URL that I enter and ignore sub-pages.

I was told if people say they agree with this ITT, the feature would be added.
 
cougarclaws said:
I'm not really concerned with how the sub-page is ranking since that's not the page I'm building links to. It would be great if there was a way to track the exact URL that I enter and ignore sub-pages.
Click to expand...

A better solution would be to have all URLs for the domain that are ranking for a keyword get logged, but only the top one show up when you click on the cache'd page. Then, you can see all of them when you export the rankings to csv.

This way you can show clients that they own x places in the rankings for a keyword, rather than just one. This still allows you to see if a specific page you are working on beats the other, but it allows for other possibilities and views of the data as well.
 
Rexibit said:
A better solution would be to have all URLs for the domain that are ranking for a keyword get logged, but only the top one show up when you click on the cache'd page. Then, you can see all of them when you export the rankings to csv.

This way you can show clients that they own x places in the rankings for a keyword, rather than just one. This still allows you to see if a specific page you are working on beats the other, but it allows for other possibilities and views of the data as well.
Click to expand...

rep+^
 
Rexibit said:
A better solution would be to have all URLs for the domain that are ranking for a keyword get logged, but only the top one show up when you click on the cache'd page. Then, you can see all of them when you export the rankings to csv.

This way you can show clients that they own x places in the rankings for a keyword, rather than just one. This still allows you to see if a specific page you are working on beats the other, but it allows for other possibilities and views of the data as well.
Click to expand...

At least your suggestions make sense ;] I'll keep these in mind.
 
signed up. awesome stuff. only issue i have so far is functionality, and that's maybe allow our usernames to be hyperlinked....that way when i click on it it takes me to my settings or something. since my eyes are already on that area of the page anyway its just easier :)
 
Just got the invite. Have no gripes so far, looks useful.

Only nitpicking things in terms of design (since I'm a designer)..

#1 - The layout as seen from the main control panel area needs a lot more vertical margin (margin-top: 30px or so) from the white panel that contains the domain listings.. it's smashed up to the top and everything is a bit cluttered that way..

#2 - In different areas of the site / design, the font is either times new roman or what appears to be arial (this is seen on the main control page as well).. keep consistent with the font, preferably arial or whatever you're using that is sans-serif.

#3 - The little "current time" blip on the upper right is barely visible.. the drop shadow doesn't create enough contrast, kind of difficult to see.

^-Obviously nitpicky stuff, just contributing my opinion. ;)
 
Another suggestion.

Categorization.

Allow users to categorize domains into folders.
Allow users to categorize keywords within the domains into folders.

This is useful especially for sites with multiple themes (I think).
 
clyde said:
Another suggestion.

Categorization.

Allow users to categorize domains into folders.
Allow users to categorize keywords within the domains into folders.

This is useful especially for sites with multiple themes (I think).
Click to expand...

Domain groups already exist. Keyword groups are a possibility, trying to avoid as much unnecessary clutter as possible right now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom