Serp Annihilator V2-Private blog networks,bookmarks,wikis,videos,tweets,doc sharing

[tim880722]

Its pretty much common sense that in order to dominate the SERPS you need a large diversity of quality links. Doing a large scrapebox or xrumer blast simply just doesn’t cut it anymore.

Introducing the SERP ANNIHILATOR!!!


Link Diversity!
High Quality Links!
IP Diversity!
Results!


What will you be getting?

150+ Posts on my private high Pagerank Wordpress network.

30 Posts on my private high Pagerank Pivotx blog network (Manually done). (was previously 20 posts)

500+ Sumissions to Seo Link Machine Blog Network.

1200+ Posts on a few different private networks owned by other people.

2000+ Wiki Submissions (was previousy only 750)

400+ Social Bookmarks.

150+ Tweets.

30+ Video submissions (Also includes 1 video creation).

15+ Doc sharing site submissions.

6 unique 500 word articles.


$147



Turn around time about 14 days (You don’t want all these links done in 1 day)

What to expect in the report?

Unfortunately due to a lot of private networks being deindexed there will be no reports for the posts on any of the private networks, although you will be able to monitor these links with Seo Spyglass or similar software.

You will get a full report for the Wikis, Social Bookmarks, Video Submissions and Doc Sharing Submissions.

 

[tim880722]

I have beefed up this service a bit

Instead of 750 wikis there are now 2000 wikis.
There are now 30 high mozrank pivotx posts instead of 20.

Reviews from the previous thread should be coming in soon:zzwhip:

 

[ItsDiscoBaby]

I will buy if you agree to show me report. PM me if you would

 

[jimmyn]

Speed and Communication 5/5 - It's as advertised TAT wise, and the seller responded to my requests for updates even though i couldn't post in the original thread because of the stupid thread closing rules.

Quality 4/5 - Everything is great apart from the wikis. Same user name and title for the wiki pages used across all of them, and quite a few of them i couldn't find. The spaces in the URL didn't help when trying to find the links using scrapebox, but i found a few manually. The bookmarks all use the same user name as well.

You get to choose your own message for the tweet which is good, and most of the bookmarks were found and are a great service on their own.

The sample private blogs look good, and if all the ones used are of the same standard this is a great part of the service.

Video submissions are all good, links usually with site url which is good for anchor diversity i suppose. Though some links are just the url in plain text rather than an actual clickable link, which often happens when trying to add a link to video sites.

No movement as yet but used this on tough keywords which are quite high up already. I thought this service would give them that extra push, and it could still do so.

Price 4/5 - It's probably about right if the private blog networks are as good as the sample sent.

Overall 4/5 - it's a great service, and would be even better if a few things were ironed out. The diversity is there.

I'll be ordering some more shortly. Cheers!

 

[jimmyn]

Made another two orders, let me know if you need any more info or if there is a problem with the multiple orders on the order form.

 

[butcher]

REVIEW

received my report for my discounted review package yesterday

Speed 4/5
Delivered within the TAT, took about two weeks. My site could take it done faster but a newer site would probably benefit from a two week TAT

Quality 4/5
Same comments as the above reviewer. Everything looks good except the duplicate usernames. I dont like that, sort that out and its a 5/5 service.
The sample blog posts look good as does the video.

Price 4/5
Reasonable price for the work involved and the movement I have seen.

Overall 4.5/5
Good package, sort a few little bits out and it will be a very good service. The real test is serp movement.. I gave the OP a tough KW which i have been sitting mid page, page 2 for some time. I saw no movement for a while and was doubting if this package was any good or even if it had started then a couple of days ago I started to move. I am now sitting mid page, page one for both of my main keywords. I have thrown quite a few services at this in the past and havent seen movement like this before so I am happy with the results, lets hope it sticks. I think it will due to the diversity and dripping.

 

[nmridul]

Received my report also today.

Speed 3/5
14 days is what was promised, but it took longer than that. Towards the end I was told that the report will be sent tomorrow morning (in a day) but it was sent 3 days after that.

Communication 2/5
After submitting the order, there were 1 or 2 mails. Then silence and when I did not receive any updates towards the deadline, I had to follow up about the status. There were no indications in advance about any possible delay. Even when it was promised "tomorrow morning", the report was sent 3 days after that, that too only after I contacted him. This is where I wish he had acted and informed me in advance.

Quality 3/5
- Same comments as above 2 reviewers. The wiki links are all with the same user name and the pattern is clearly visible even to a dumb search algorithm. At the least such simple things should be taken care of.

- The video submissions are good. Even some bonus video submissions were done and that is great. Here also the user name is same accross all the submissions.
Also the tags are messed up in couple of them. Some of the tags with multiple words got split into multiple tags. So you end up with "No", "This" etc as tags.

- Retweets from many users as promised. But the users that are retweeting are mainly retweeting from the same person. So all their profiles looks almost the same. If it is automated, there should be some effort put to make it look random.



Overall 3.5/5
Sorry, but I did not receive what I expected.
Maybe I will order again if the service improves on all the above mentioned aspects.

 

[tim880722]

Speed and Communication 5/5 - It's as advertised TAT wise, and the seller responded to my requests for updates even though i couldn't post in the original thread because of the stupid thread closing rules.

Quality 4/5 - Everything is great apart from the wikis. Same user name and title for the wiki pages used across all of them, and quite a few of them i couldn't find. The spaces in the URL didn't help when trying to find the links using scrapebox, but i found a few manually. The bookmarks all use the same user name as well.

You get to choose your own message for the tweet which is good, and most of the bookmarks were found and are a great service on their own.

The sample private blogs look good, and if all the ones used are of the same standard this is a great part of the service.

Video submissions are all good, links usually with site url which is good for anchor diversity i suppose. Though some links are just the url in plain text rather than an actual clickable link, which often happens when trying to add a link to video sites.

No movement as yet but used this on tough keywords which are quite high up already. I thought this service would give them that extra push, and it could still do so.

Price 4/5 - It's probably about right if the private blog networks are as good as the sample sent.

Overall 4/5 - it's a great service, and would be even better if a few things were ironed out. The diversity is there.

I'll be ordering some more shortly. Cheers!

Thanks for the review buddy, i hope you see some serp movement soon

Made another two orders, let me know if you need any more info or if there is a problem with the multiple orders on the order form.

Got it thanks

received my report for my discounted review package yesterday

Speed 4/5
Delivered within the TAT, took about two weeks. My site could take it done faster but a newer site would probably benefit from a two week TAT

Quality 4/5
Same comments as the above reviewer. Everything looks good except the duplicate usernames. I dont like that, sort that out and its a 5/5 service.
The sample blog posts look good as does the video.

Price 4/5
Reasonable price for the work involved and the movement I have seen.

Overall 4.5/5
Good package, sort a few little bits out and it will be a very good service. The real test is serp movement.. I gave the OP a tough KW which i have been sitting mid page, page 2 for some time. I saw no movement for a while and was doubting if this package was any good or even if it had started then a couple of days ago I started to move. I am now sitting mid page, page one for both of my main keywords. I have thrown quite a few services at this in the past and havent seen movement like this before so I am happy with the results, lets hope it sticks. I think it will due to the diversity and dripping.

Thanks for the review glad you saw some good movement:girl:

Received my report also today.

Speed 3/5
14 days is what was promised, but it took longer than that. Towards the end I was told that the report will be sent tomorrow morning (in a day) but it was sent 3 days after that.

Communication 2/5
After submitting the order, there were 1 or 2 mails. Then silence and when I did not receive any updates towards the deadline, I had to follow up about the status. There were no indications in advance about any possible delay. Even when it was promised "tomorrow morning", the report was sent 3 days after that, that too only after I contacted him. This is where I wish he had acted and informed me in advance.

Quality 3/5
- Same comments as above 2 reviewers. The wiki links are all with the same user name and the pattern is clearly visible even to a dumb search algorithm. At the least such simple things should be taken care of.

- The video submissions are good. Even some bonus video submissions were done and that is great. Here also the user name is same accross all the submissions.
Also the tags are messed up in couple of them. Some of the tags with multiple words got split into multiple tags. So you end up with "No", "This" etc as tags.

- Retweets from many users as promised. But the users that are retweeting are mainly retweeting from the same person. So all their profiles looks almost the same. If it is automated, there should be some effort put to make it look random.



Overall 3.5/5
Sorry, but I did not receive what I expected.
Maybe I will order again if the service improves on all the above mentioned aspects.

Thanks for your honest review, its always appreciated.

It seems the biggest issue was the wikis with the same names. This has already been sorted.
Instead of 750 wikis I am now providing 2000 wikis and they are all random usernames