Hi
Thanks for he honest review. I really appreciate it, next time we will try to reduce article spinning % and make it more valuable.
Thanks
And waiting for others to share there thoughts and waiting for orders to come......
SENUKE Service Best Ever on WF (2500+ Do Follow Backlinks within a month)
- Thread starter roger101
- Start date
- Status
Hi
Thanks for he honest review. I really appreciate it, next time we will try to reduce article spinning % and make it more valuable.
Thanks
And waiting for others to share there thoughts and waiting for orders to come......
hey,
I also got the free review copy. Just checked the excel file with quite a lot of links.
Web2.0 Profiles
I got around 170 links. All the links were standard profile links as usual and all of them had my anchors and links as requested. Not much to comment about it. No errors and everything perfectly done so far.
Article submission
I got around 110 article submissions. I did check 20 odd links. The article were there. But the problem was either they were totally copied or badly spinned (as pointed out above). One anchor of my choice was there in the end of each article. Although I'd recommend placing anchors in text of article.
Not sure about the seo power these article submission will give but I surely will wait and watch on the serps. The keywords I gave him were quite tough.
Social Bookmarking
Social bookmarking was done for the web 2.0 properties not my site. I guess that was done so that those get indexed properly and in a timely manner. The strategy is good.
In the end Rss feed submission was done.
Overall With the service I am satisfied. It's really too early to say about the result. I'll come back and post if I see any movement or not. (2 weeks) I would tell the future buyers to be aware of the content. Don't expect kick ass spinned or original content. I think the idea behind the service is SEO.
I'd recommend the OP to work on his articles and their formatting, etc to give a good feel of the service. And I'd minus on the price as well. They are really steep although I am aware the senuke is a powerful tool.
I'll again drop by to give a status on the removed links, serp movements, etc
Lets hope this thing works out well.
I also got the free review copy. Just checked the excel file with quite a lot of links.
Web2.0 Profiles
I got around 170 links. All the links were standard profile links as usual and all of them had my anchors and links as requested. Not much to comment about it. No errors and everything perfectly done so far.
Article submission
I got around 110 article submissions. I did check 20 odd links. The article were there. But the problem was either they were totally copied or badly spinned (as pointed out above). One anchor of my choice was there in the end of each article. Although I'd recommend placing anchors in text of article.
Not sure about the seo power these article submission will give but I surely will wait and watch on the serps. The keywords I gave him were quite tough.
Social Bookmarking
Social bookmarking was done for the web 2.0 properties not my site. I guess that was done so that those get indexed properly and in a timely manner. The strategy is good.
In the end Rss feed submission was done.
Overall With the service I am satisfied. It's really too early to say about the result. I'll come back and post if I see any movement or not. (2 weeks) I would tell the future buyers to be aware of the content. Don't expect kick ass spinned or original content. I think the idea behind the service is SEO.
I'd recommend the OP to work on his articles and their formatting, etc to give a good feel of the service. And I'd minus on the price as well. They are really steep although I am aware the senuke is a powerful tool.
I'll again drop by to give a status on the removed links, serp movements, etc
Lets hope this thing works out well.
So I got my report, the guy sent over a shit ton of links in an XLS report. I randomly scanned through them and everything seems to be really good. As you can see he did article submissions, profile creation, social news submissions using deep links and finally RSS submissions.
I am considering hiring him as we speak, for $90 a week you can't really go wrong. I guess it's too early to say how effective his work was but I have a very strong authority site that I think may be the perfect candidate for his work.
I am considering hiring him as we speak, for $90 a week you can't really go wrong. I guess it's too early to say how effective his work was but I have a very strong authority site that I think may be the perfect candidate for his work.
So I got my report, the guy sent over a shit ton of links in an XLS report. I randomly scanned through them and everything seems to be really good. As you can see he did article submissions, profile creation, social news submissions using deep links and finally RSS submissions.
I am considering hiring him as we speak, for $90 a week you can't really go wrong. I guess it's too early to say how effective his work was but I have a very strong authority site that I think may be the perfect candidate for his work.
Thanks for the honest review ly2. We are ready to take orders.
OK, here's my review below. Though I have got the report 2 days ago, but haven't got time to post the review yet, sorry for the late.
1.) Report: Report delivered in a xls sheet with tons of links there. I haven't checked all of them, but checked quite a few. And among them almost 80% are good, rest 20% have some problems in them, such no publicly-viewable link (you need to log-in, so it's useless), not the exact article-location (you have to click further to see the actual article with link), etc. Overall it's good.
2.) Turn-around: It's really good, I get the report exactly when promised.
3.) Anchor text variation: I have given couple anchors, and it seems only 1 anchor used extensively, others just got a few.
4.) Link-quality: When it's come to SEO, the key is diversity, and it's the right package if you want link-diversity. You'll get various kind of links - web2.0, profile, contextual links in article etc.
5.) Effect of the package: Though it's too early to see any effect for the package, considering the package quality - I'm quite sure that once most of the links get indexed, it will do something real good to my SERP. And you shouldn't worry about indexing, the OP did SB, pinging etc., so most of the links will get indexed over time. However, it seems everyone is getting a hard time to index the links nowadays, let's see what happen.
Suggestion: Good package, great diversity, only 2 cons here -
1.) OP should check the links to be sure that they are good and are exist in the exact URL location before delivering the report, scrapebox can help in this regard.
2.) OP should try to use all anchor texts randomly so that all anchors get somewhat equal share of link-juice.
Regards,
Ravee
1.) Report: Report delivered in a xls sheet with tons of links there. I haven't checked all of them, but checked quite a few. And among them almost 80% are good, rest 20% have some problems in them, such no publicly-viewable link (you need to log-in, so it's useless), not the exact article-location (you have to click further to see the actual article with link), etc. Overall it's good.
2.) Turn-around: It's really good, I get the report exactly when promised.
3.) Anchor text variation: I have given couple anchors, and it seems only 1 anchor used extensively, others just got a few.
4.) Link-quality: When it's come to SEO, the key is diversity, and it's the right package if you want link-diversity. You'll get various kind of links - web2.0, profile, contextual links in article etc.
5.) Effect of the package: Though it's too early to see any effect for the package, considering the package quality - I'm quite sure that once most of the links get indexed, it will do something real good to my SERP. And you shouldn't worry about indexing, the OP did SB, pinging etc., so most of the links will get indexed over time. However, it seems everyone is getting a hard time to index the links nowadays, let's see what happen.
Suggestion: Good package, great diversity, only 2 cons here -
1.) OP should check the links to be sure that they are good and are exist in the exact URL location before delivering the report, scrapebox can help in this regard.
2.) OP should try to use all anchor texts randomly so that all anchors get somewhat equal share of link-juice.
Regards,
Ravee
Thanks for the honest review, sure we will do the things you requested. And thanks for those suggestions and we really appreciate it.
Here is this week special offer for WF
$240 for the one month of full service....
Or you can pay $60 per week......
We guarantee Ranking improvement within a month or money back guarantee(Only valid for one month of full service package)
This guy is good. I gave him one of my authority domains to work on and he nailed it. Got me top10 for a pretty competitive term. Granted he had a power domain to work with, but he ranked me faster and better than I was expecting. I will be using him again and have in fact hired him for another two weeks.
Hi
It's a great pleasure to work with you as ongoing projects, we are providing the services as we described in the thread, and in the last project you got top 10 within a week so its a great achievement and your domain helped it too.
Thanks again for continuing working with us.
Hi
Please provide your 3 keywords with the URL, current price tag is $60 per week. But this offer is not valid for longer because its already over and I couldn't update it and because of that I will provide one package for that price. send payments to shariyazabdeen@yahoo.com.
"$240 for the one month of full service....
Or you can pay $60 per week......"
This offer in no longer available. We are back to our normal prices. We are back to our normal prices.
Thanks
Hi
Yes, sometimes the article may seem like highly spinned, since we cannot use unique content if we use then we have to add some more fee to the service.
Here the offer again,
Buy the SeNuke service for one week and get 10K Scrape Box Blast for Free.
Buy the SeNuke service for two weeks and get 200K Xrumer Forum Posts Blast for Free.
Keep eye on this thread, we will provide interesting offers frequently.
Whats the fee for adding unique content, not spun garbage that sounds like my toaster wrote it?
Hi
For one week we need at least 75 articles and for one month its 300+ articles. And if you check those articles each of them have more than 500+ words. Let me know if you are still like to use unique content or something alternate for it.
Thanks
No offense roger but I hope you're not going to be writing the articles - I didn't really understand what you just said there.
Are you saying that in order for you to provide your service with unique articles, you need a commitment of a minimum of 75 articles a week, or 300 articles a month, with each article having a min of 500 words?
If this is what you are saying, can you give me the price on that, because that is what I'm looking for.
No offense roger but I hope you're not going to be writing the articles - I didn't really understand what you just said there.
Are you saying that in order for you to provide your service with unique articles, you need a commitment of a minimum of 75 articles a week, or 300 articles a month, with each article having a min of 500 words?
If this is what you are saying, can you give me the price on that, because that is what I'm looking for.
We need 75 articles per week, but I'm also confused, do you need us to provide the articles(written by us or hired some one) or are you going to provide the articles?. Lets fix this issue.
We use best spinner to reduce the cost involving with unique content articles. We are providing the unique content articles SENuke service but it's around $2250 - $3000 value. All the articles will be around 500 words each and within a month 360 of them will be used.
The current package we offer is using only 16 unique articles per week and each article will be spinned 5 times so it becomes 80 articles.
- Status