Quantum Physics Got Me Funked Up

"As far as the machinery observing, and not directly a human mind, I think you have to think "4th dimensionally" for this. If time is relative, than the fact that you will at some point observe it while it's moving affects it. This is demonstrated by the Erasure experiment, where they observe the particles while moving, but erase the data immediately before the particles complete their journey. When the data was erased, the particles reacted as if they were never viewed to begin with. This means that the data could never have been viewed by a conscious mind. This indicates some ridiculously creepy shit about the concept of time."


This is fucked up -

bbl taking blue pill
Nothing interesting to say except I've been responding to shit I normally don't even read for number 300...

Prepare to receive one of the most epic 300th posts EVAR!

Muhahahaha!

Ah... BTW, that quote reminds me of Flatland, A Romance of Dimensions.
 


mittex.jpg

+rep
 
Not seen it, but a lot of scientists seem to think that film is basically bullshit.

I have a friend who's a professor in something physics related and used to love talking about advanced string theory along with all the quantum crap, and he says exactly that.

He said it's great fun, but most of it's "facts" are total bollocks; like creationism for those who think they understand science.
 
this is my thread people, degree in physics coming through.

That movie "What the #$@! Do we know?" is a lot of shit, but the clip in the OP is 100% true and verifiable info. Nothing wrong with it. The concept comes from the copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, which is statistical rather than deterministic.


Maybe when you're looking, your eyes emit some waves or some shit that affect the particles? I have no idea about physics.

This isn't it at all. It's that when unobserved, the particles are in a superposition of every single one of those possibilities at the same time, and when a macroscopic observer watches in, it must be in one state, therefore the wavefunction breaks down.
 
Can all be explained very simply by reading about Quantum Superposition. Or reading about the Quantum Cat. (Schrodinger's Cat as mentioned by Unsigned Hype.)

Schrodinger made the cat experiment up as a sarcastic way of saying he thought the idea of a superposition was bullshit. He was a believer of deterministic mechanics (look up the Bohm interpretation, or pilot wave theory by de Broglie). He's rolling in his grave probably now that everyone uses the cat as *the* example for the copenhagen interpretation.
 
I was joking papajohn56. :D

You of all people should have noticed that after the words, "Can all be explained very simply..." I was hoping for a bite, because most of what i've tried to read and understand may as well be written in Cantonese. ;)

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to papajohn56 again.
 
This isn't it at all. It's that when unobserved, the particles are in a superposition of every single one of those possibilities at the same time, and when a macroscopic observer watches in, it must be in one state, therefore the wavefunction breaks down.

okay, don't laught but i don't get it:

how does it "know" that it's observed?
 
thats from the movie What the bleep do we know?

Watch the whole thing. It's a good program if you remove that stupid emotional fat chick.
Actually it's that "stupid emotional fat chick" who made the whole movie with the help of her students (also featured in the movie). Therefore the conclusions drawn in the movie are questionable to say at least.

okay, don't laught but i don't get it:

how does it "know" that it's observed?
It's something like the observing machinery expects a certain result and the particle "acts" on that. It's something like you can't actually do any (nondestructive) observation without affecting the results. I think they are trying to use the same concept for quantum-based stream encryption/security (which is said to be physically impossible to intercept).
 
That doesn't make any logical sense that merely observing would change its nature, so I'm assuming they're either wrong or are phrasing it incorrectly.
 
That doesn't make any logical sense that merely observing would change its nature, so I'm assuming they're either wrong or are phrasing it incorrectly.

no, it's true. it's a verified part of quantum mechanics, and is mathematically verifiable. Quantum physics itself isn't logical. We're used to deterministic systems - i.e. I roll ball at this speed, we know it will end up at this specific point. Quantum is all based on statistics
 
okay, don't laught but i don't get it:

how does it "know" that it's observed?

it doesn't know, it's the process of a macroscopic level object attempting to interact with a quantum state, it causes the wavefunction to break down
 
That doesn't make any logical sense that merely observing would change its nature, so I'm assuming they're either wrong or are phrasing it incorrectly.

this statement astutely summarizes the common theme underlying your entire post history here.

it's like you wrote your whole autobiography in just one sentence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike
I like how people who think they're scientists and intellectuals think everything must make logical sense to them or it's false. Like the intellectuals throughout history didn't think the same fucking thing about what they observed in the world and then were massively proven wrong.

It's like they all think we've finished science and we won't ever have any other breakthroughs that change the way we look at things.
 
Speaking out of my ass but a couple of thoughts are running through my head.

I agree that your eyes can't emit waves but wouldn't light waves, sound waves and any other wave interfere or contaminate the experiment since we are talking quantum.

Speaking of contamination, wouldn't you need a complete sterile, static free environment plus a complete vacuum to accurately measure quantum experiments.

In the test mentioned were all alloys used to fling the particles demagnetized? If the slit plates where alloy where they demagnetized?

Plus we have not hit on the effects gravity may have.
 
oop hang on I think i found the solution to the problem....yep

Watch the video on super slow-mo very closely as the particle escapes the electron gun around 3:55.


wagenpartical.jpg


Seems a Wagenparticle snuck in there.

Science already knows wagenparticles split themselves then recombines for optimal article production. How they get themselves into particle accelerators and electron guns no one knows, but i'm sure there's money to be made in it.