Exactly. I actually would support them raging/fighting against the U.S. for us stealing their resources and killing their people - and I'm sure they do that a tiny bit.
lol.
But you're not going to understand this because you're a britfag moron (like your tag says) and you're being argumentative. But the difference is that these cunts want to take away others freedom of speech. They are raging because of fucking cartoons and a retarded film that some unknown idiot made. They want to change the world to stop the free exchange of ideas and criticisms. Fuck that and fuck you.
And some people don't believe propaganda still works in this day and age :1orglaugh:
It's lucky that we have noble people like the government protecting people in other countries' freedom of speech by bombing the shit out of them.
I think freedom requires a certain level of non-violence.. Invading someone's country in the name of "freedom" is like pointing a gun to someone's head and telling them "you will like what I like"
I'm unable to comment on other countries, because the media seems to be incredibly biased in their reporting of that film - pretty much only showing Libya. In addition, only paying attention to the UK/US media is only paying attention to the aggressor. I'm not sure how most court cases would go down if the judge only let the Prosecution speak.
That said, I'll speak the limited knowledge I know about Libya. They killed the person from the US embassy. Castle Law at play. You have a country with the best GDP in Africa, excellent social housing, water, electricity, schooling programs, to rival most Western nations. A very Liberal government, with the most recent report from the UN being pretty gleaming. The leader lives in a tent, because he promised years ago that until every Citizen of Libya lived in a house, he wouldn't. Several large countries decide they don't like you, bomb the shit out of you, destroy your country, and decide to elect a Sharia law government. The majority of the population don't necessarily agree with all this, but against the might of the US, UK and French military and equipment combined, it's pretty much a choice of agree or die. And then one of the invaders gets killed. Is that justified?
I'm not saying I think that person should've died, because I don't know that they knew the full background on the country, nor that they necessarily had the choice to go out there.
All reasoning and self-improvement stops when people can't express themselves and critique each-others ideas. I'd carpet-nuke the entire middle east if it was needed to preserve freedom of speech/expression. I'd press the button myself with no regret - all to save the freedom of speech if it was needed. Because every god damn thing is lost w/out it.. modernity, science, etc is completely lost w/out it. You're not allowed to question god, authority, life, etc. Freedom itself is completely impossible w/out first having the freedom of speech/expression.
Thank God so many people in the government love freedom as much as you!
So as long as they have this Sharia law and intolerance towards others speech, ideas, religions, philosophies, etc, I don't feel any sympathy for them at all.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jne9t8sHpUc"]Alanis Morissette - Ironic (Video) - YouTube[/ame]
