Me? TC in 2001- Caught it fucking EARLY (which is the trick, bros)... They took one of my nuts off, and no matter HOW hard they tried to bully me into it, I opted for ZERO radiation, ZERO chemo, and just have a CT scan once a year (called surveillance).
Did you go for the prosthetic replacement or are you cruising with a half sack?
![]()
Talk about a train wreck of a thread. Fuck you guys, was looking for your ideological stance, not your oh-so-genius medical advice.
One neat thing I just learned though is "train wreck" is obviously a very popular form of weed. Just search Google Images to see what I mean.
yeah... and I'm an idiot. Get this book (by actual doctor) Anticancer: A New Way Of Life - David Servan-Schreiber no conspiracy, pure science and experience. Think you will like it.Being bored at work and ... yeah, I really don't.
People who begin with conspiracy theories in the face of cancer are already way too far gone.
Stopping now, thanks.
::emp::
I can't believe people are brainwashed by hippy alternative idiots...
Yes, companies make profits.
But companies and science and medicine is made up of people.
People who had friends and family be ill or die from cancer.
You really believe they put on their lab coat, exchange some deep conspiracy handshakes, and try NOT to cure cancer?
Fuck you.
::emp::
Before the Mayo Clinic updated their article base this year, they had articles by "experts" (yes, licensed doctors) that disputed the existence of adrenal insufficiency and intestinal candida overgrowth (both of which are conditions I am personally recovering from.)
The articles had claimed that the conditions were likely only in the patients' head and to be wary of alternative practitioners, despite acknowledging that both condtions existed in extreme, advanced form (addison's disease and systemic candiadis).
At the time the mayo clinic online forums were chock full of people dealing with the non-extreme versions of both conditions.
The old articles have now been taken down, which comes as no surprise. The established medical community has a habit of ridiculing new conditions and treatments but only up until the point where said ridicule threatens their credibility as a whole.
There is a sweet spot of maximum profitability that is reached by lagging a measured amount behind the alternative medical community. You keep people in the dark to bleed their wallets dry but come clean when too many start to question.
So on behalf on anyone and everyone that's ever been screwed by the established medical community Emp:
Fuck you.
The profit is in treating the symptoms, not the cure.
Lollololl![]()
Talk about a train wreck of a thread. Fuck you guys, was looking for your ideological stance, not your oh-so-genius medical advice.
One neat thing I just learned though is "train wreck" is obviously a very popular form of weed. Just search Google Images to see what I mean.
yeah... and I'm an idiot. Get this book (by actual doctor) Anticancer: A New Way Of Life - David Servan-Schreiber no conspiracy, pure science and experience. Think you will like it.
What do you think would happen to the stock price, of say, Pfizer, if tomorrow they came out with a cure for cancer?
The market cap would make appl look like a pink sheet stock.
Yes but he was a doctor representing academic medicine. He was open to other "alternative" treatments (and did a great job!).NOW.. I know I shouldn't but...
This guy is one of my heroes. He is one of the founders of the US branch of Medecine sans frontieres.
That said, he was a professor of Psychiatry. An outstanding one, but not an oncologist, a psychiatrist.
He was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor at 31.
What he advocated is integrative medicine - as in - a good look at lifestyle, nutrition, etc .. in addition to classic, western medicine. And as a way to prevent cancer.
He himself went through surgrey, chemo, and radiation therapy- and no, he did not denounce it.
Why am I speaking in past tense?
He died in 2011, age 50 - from cancer.
Cancer is a bitch. And sadly, he didn't have the answer either.
In his memory, here is some info on that awesome organization:
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) International
Médecins Sans Frontières - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
::emp::
There is a lot more of these.RESULTS: The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA.
CONCLUSION:
As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival. To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required.
Yes but he was a doctor representing academic medicine. He was open to other "alternative" treatments (and did a great job!).
The contribution of cytotoxic che... [Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2004] - PubMed - NCBI
There is a lot more of these.
Did you go for the prosthetic replacement or are you cruising with a half sack?
What do you think would happen to the stock price, of say, Pfizer, if tomorrow they came out with a cure for cancer?
The market cap would make appl look like a pink sheet stock.