High page rank privately owned blog network at your disposal

Status
Not open for further replies.
BlokBlok said:
Posting my review after about 2 weeks

Communication (5/5):
Price (5/5):
Quality (5/5):

Full review:

One thing I have never liked about some private network is that your article gets blasted to every blog in the network and makes an obvious link footprint that Google can easily pick up. ShlomiKalfa's network randomly places your spun article within the network which is great.

Now for SERP movements:

Site 1- Very competitive
During the time using this network, my biggest site's first keyword moved from bouncing in between pages 3-4 to sticking to mid page 2 after a couple articles and my second keyword, from not on the radar to sticking on page 2 as well. I will say I had bought some high PR links outside of this network during this time, but not many.

Sites 2,3,4 - Mildly competitive
I was able to take 3 sites I had just created and indexed. I posted 1 article with 3 links pointing to each site. Two of them went from not being ranked to page two with no other link building whatsoever.

Site 5 Mildly competitive
The last site I tested was created some time ago and I havent messed with it in quite awhile. The site has had 1 scrapebox blast to it when created and sat unranked for a good bit until now. I posted 1 article and now it sites on page 1 between spots 9-10.

Overall, this network works and I recommend it. I would like to ask anyone signing up, please dont crap up the network with shitty articles, I hand spin my articles so they are completely readable, quality is important to maintain a network.
Click to expand...

Thanks you very much for the review i am happy your seeing good results.

Update there are 8 $75 slots left.
 


My Quick Review:
After some submissions it is clear to me this service has value. Hopefully it stays that way and ShlomiKalfa keeps the network strong and clean.

On a few different occasions I have submitted an article, then a couple hours later gone to SEScout (which appears to be working much better now) and sure enough a bump in SERPs for the keywords targeted. Some have been more competitive then others. Sometimes a really nice bump. So far they are sticking or at least higher up then they were. Not sure long term once they roll off the homepage, but so far so good.

It is very simple to use.

Give it a try, if you don't see results cancel - Just don't post crap. So far I'm seeing results.
 
davidb said:
My Quick Review:
After some submissions it is clear to me this service has value. Hopefully it stays that way and ShlomiKalfa keeps the network strong and clean.

On a few different occasions I have submitted an article, then a couple hours later gone to SEScout (which appears to be working much better now) and sure enough a bump in SERPs for the keywords targeted. Some have been more competitive then others. Sometimes a really nice bump. So far they are sticking or at least higher up then they were. Not sure long term once they roll off the homepage, but so far so good.

It is very simple to use.

Give it a try, if you don't see results cancel - Just don't post crap. So far I'm seeing results.
Click to expand...

Thanks you very much for the review, it is really appreciated.

secretagentdad said:
Interested if 50.
Click to expand...
As much as i would like to have a new member it would be unfair to take the price down like that.

Thanks for the interest though.
 
Signed up and I'm pretty impressed with the interface, speed of indexing, etc. Nice product.

One complaint: Some of the members are posting really crappy articles that appear to have been spun with the "Replace Everybody's Favorites" button in the best spinner. Is there any way to force higher quality? It's the crappy articles that will cause the network to be exposed and shut down. I would pay more for a network where all the members submitted well spun, quality stuff.
 
You were the owner of Seo Ultimate Network that self-imploded a few months back.

How do we know the same thing won't happen again.
 
rish3 said:
Signed up and I'm pretty impressed with the interface, speed of indexing, etc. Nice product.

One complaint: Some of the members are posting really crappy articles that appear to have been spun with the "Replace Everybody's Favorites" button in the best spinner. Is there any way to force higher quality? It's the crappy articles that will cause the network to be exposed and shut down. I would pay more for a network where all the members submitted well spun, quality stuff.
Click to expand...

Rish3, Thanks very much i really enjoy reading you like the network.
about post quality we are always trying to keep the quality up.

wrinkle said:
You were the owner of Seo Ultimate Network that self-imploded a few months back.

How do we know the same thing won't happen again.
Click to expand...

SEO ultimate network, did not implode or anything like that, S.U.N was sold to a bigger company, due to really high maintenance and high hosting requirements.

The new network consist of 50 blogs and max of 50 members, where as S.U.N had 300 members and 600 blogs which was really hard to up-keep

I have discovered that the new owner of S.U.N shut it down for that same reason, my brother and i (which were the original programmer of S.U.N) have found a way to make that whole system a lot lighter and will probably reopen a similar network.

Hope that answers your question.

let me know if you have any other questions.

best regards
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom