Happy false flag day everyone. Pity the sheeple.
Do sheeple refer to people who don't agree with you? Or just base their opinions on the balance of evidence? Just curious - for most CT's that's who they refer to as sheeple.
Happy false flag day everyone. Pity the sheeple.
Is anyone going to believe that? No. I wouldn't expect them to. Yet, I'm just some dipshit who threw his grandmother off of a boat. I'm not some behemoth government who claimed to have spent 14 years looking for a fugitive, only to throw away all of the evidence of my "true" story.
Ok, so why should I believe this story about people who have everything at their disposal to PROVE things... spent 14 years searching for someone, provides no evidence of anything, and just says that they threw some dude off of a boat in the middle of the ocean?
I even left a ton of stuff out, but what a bunch of bullshit.
I'd be careful if I were you in that case.I remember the late great Patrice O'neal in a podcast saying that the phony picture of Bin Laden's dead face that was all over the internet was actually made to be real, but when the nerds of the internet quickly proved it was fake the powers that be just pretended like they had nothing to do with it.
Then they clearly killed Patrice.
I remember the late great Patrice O'neal in a podcast saying that the phony picture of Bin Laden's dead face that was all over the internet was actually made to be real, but when the nerds of the internet quickly proved it was fake the powers that be just pretended like they had nothing to do with it.
Then they clearly killed Patrice.
^You missed LBJ's Gulf of Tonkin False Flag and the Turkish one caught on camera last year... That was an instant classic:
Turkish Officials Caught Plotting False Flag Attack In Syria, Audio Leaked - YouTube Turkish Leaders Caught Plotting False Flag Attack! - YouTube
But yeah, deep down, governments care about us.
Sorry to be such a Debbie Downer, but I think you're regularly overly-idealistic about things like this, and greatly underestimate the control of the state.
Laurel Canyon in the 1960s and early 1970s
Yes, of course you must be right. The government set up a false flag operation to kill 3,000 citizens so it could invade one of the poorest and most inhospitable countries in the world - makes absolute sense to us logical thinkers.
Have you noticed where that "inhospitable country" falls on the map? I take it you never played the game "risk"?
Let me ask you one question. Who has gained the most from that days events?
Militant Islam?
wow...amazing...Operation Northwoods - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaAnybody who thinks that the US govt can't bomb it's own people in order to create a cause to attack another country really needs to search for Operation Northwoods.
to think that stuff like this was seriously proposed to the pres. all it needed was a pres (or pres-in-fact...like a chaney perhaps?) to approve it..hmm.The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the US government's anti-communist Cuban Project, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by President John F. Kennedy.
wow...amazing...Operation Northwoods - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
to think that stuff like this was seriously proposed to the pres. all it needed was a pres (or pres-in-fact...like a chaney perhaps?) to approve it..hmm.
Exactly my point. The attack did not happen because of ONE man. How long does it take to make sure that one is on your side as well? What then?
good point. and just to add, he was replaced by a war-hawk. exactly the type of pres the joint chief of staffs love and dont need any convincing to go to war. vietnam, for instance. geesh..the plot thickens. gonna wear my tinfoil hat now :conehead:And as far as I can remember, that one man's career in politics was short-lived.