No, you're not. You're an ignoramus when it comes to economics.
Ad hominem.
99% of my economics understanding comes from reading books from AnCaps, including from the Mises site. Again, I'll admit I haven't studied as much as you seem to have done on this subject, but you won't lose me in the conversation.
Plus, you're an ideological zealot, which makes your errors totally skewed towards mental retardation.
Ad hominem again. I happen to turn out to be right far more than ppl on this board like to admit.
Case in point: Chromebooks:
Maybe Those Chromebooks Weren’t Such A Crazy Idea After All | TechCrunch
Acer's sales numbers could be another sign that Chromebooks are here to stay | The Verge
I may have a bit of ideological zealotry in me, but I also don't speak without researching what I talk about a bit.
Bitcoin is not a money. Fiat dollars are not money. We haven't had money since pre-WWII.
TOUCHDOWN!
This is more than I had hoped to hear you admit... You just classified bitcoin and fiat USD the same.
Given this, it is clear that if you took the threat of force away from the USD, then bitcoin would be the new favorite currency in no time flat.
Or are you claiming that when the threat of force goes away, then people would pick up gold coins again and mainly trade in those?
Second, gold has not been used for day to day transactions for 100s of years. Of but you're conversant on this topic, right? DERP
Of course; it's too impractical; a problem that bitcoin solves.
I only brought it gold up because you seem to want to revert back to it or a basket of currencies including it instead of bitcoin.
Until people stop existing in physical reality, and exist entirely in a digital reality, there will always be a demand for real money.
What, in the outback? Sub-Saharan Africa? Amish colonies? Post-apocolyptically?
Do I really need to make the argument for such inconsequential situations?
Bitcoin can be every money to everyone who has a computer... Once we get the government out of it's way... Which judging by the price graph, has a chance from momentum alone.
As for these oddballs like the Amish, WHO CARES??? Let them barter directly... I'm for freedom, and what the free market wants, it should get.
There is no effective scarcity in the digital realm. Without effective scarcity, we wouldn't even need money in the first place.
Oh this ought to be good...
Please tell us why bitcoin is not effectively scarce. You didn't even know that it was
divisible last year!
Mining rigs and computational power are both indisputably scarce, and those are exactly the finite resources that keep ALL cryptocurrencies going...
Soooooo, unless you foolishly think it would be possible to "make more bitcoins" then of course bitcoins are effectively scarce because all computing power is scarce and must be used to CHOOSE WHICH cryptocurrency they wish to support.
There can be only one cryptocurrency. Ask yourself if you'd rather mine litecoins or bitcoins right now and you'll start to understand.
All you guys are doing is trading crypto hashes. Files with pseudo-random strings of text in them. Nothing more.
That's enough. We clearly do see value in them.
My arguments are not derived from Mises. My argument is derived from reality and I think, a pretty fair understanding of economics.
Fine; they just don't include a pretty fair understanding of the cryptocurrency landscape.
...Which is beyond sad considering what it offers libertarians.
You've not presented any sort of intelligent or cogent argument in favor of Bitcoin to support even half of your outlandish delusions.
Can you?
Define it and I'll produce it.
Until then I'll keep saying what is important, as I always have.
Nope; Freedomania.
Nothing in today's economy, internet or otherwise refutes anything Mises has written, and I challenge you to prove otherwise.
I'm not sure it does or not... Just that today's needs for money are now different than they once were. Why is this so hard to accept?
It's no different than trading in mortgage derivatives except without institutional support, it will never reach that scale.
Oh really? Are you sure about that?
Just off the top of my head:
- You can't make more bitcoins. They are truly scarce.
- You can't go buy some mortgage derivatives in 20 minutes flat.
- You can't be taxed on bitcoin income if you know what you're doing.
- You can't sneak a million dollars in Mortgage derivatives into any country on the planet.
- You can't tell the government to go fuck themselves trading mortgage derivatives, either.
If you look around, and you don't see the sucker in the BTC game, you're the sucker.
Good thing I can see him then. :evil_laughter: