You still do not understand what I think I have explained clearly. I am not promoting a Utopian free market. Utopia is a fantasy.But what I am saying is that we can never reach the point of a truly free market as you described. And if all we do is remove government regulations, then we are left with equally strong forces that will continue to prevent a "free market". But those remaining forces work almost exclusively for those individuals with the most influence. We are still not free.
When you remove the government which is the biggest drag on the system, you end up with a lot of smaller drags, which are much easier to avoid, or work around, or remove.
We want the successful people in a society to have influence, and the unsuccessful people to not have influence. The government allows the unsuccessful/cheaters/liars/crooks/scammers/monopolists to prosper, whereas in a market, people who are unsuccessful go bankrupt.
Yes, the market will not be perfect. But I never claimed it would be. I am saying without equivocation, that voluntary relations are necessary for a rational price system, without which, an economy cannot function.
The state constantly intervenes in voluntary relations and distorts the price system.
We may agree on some things, but not a lot of things.I think you are missing my point. I completely agree with your assessment of a free market. I think we actually agree on a lot of things.