which would I prefer?
Uh, how about the whole "war on terror" is a joke and I'll take my fucking risks given that yes, tragically 3000 people died but no one seems NEARLY as concerned with lung cancer deaths, car accidents, or heart disease which all kill more people in a year than will ever be killed by terrorists even were a war to unfold.
So how about we go ahead and end the ridiculous waste of our tax dollars that is this war which hasn't made us one millimeter safer, get rid of the dumb processes like the TSA which are stripping law abiding people of their civil liberties and revoke the patriot act which was a bunch of garbage that the government managed to shove down the throats with the full support of people like you at the time because they claimed it would allow AmerikUh to hunt those dirty darkies which the flyover states love to fear. Of course it's actually their own ignorance and lack of retirement planning or education they should be a hell of a lot more concerned over as their cushy union jobs get outsourced to countries full of non-ignorant people perfectly willing to get their grind on as opposed to ride around in rascal scooters 150lbs overweight.
How about that?
That a decent answer for you from this "obamabot"
I don't know where you're from- but I live in an area that is an actual target (it's quite funny how someone in some corner of this country I wouldn't set foot in thinks Al Queda gives a shit about taking out their new shiny stop light), and feel PERFECTLY safe with this plan.
When another 3,000 people die the second we stop being "protected" perhaps I'll change my tune. But of course a domestic terrorist could hit us again, you know, like McVeigh or the Unabomber. They're not as scary though b/c they're white.
Right?
