As others have said it could be to cover their 6's from legal pressures. The public outcry over how hard it was for customers to cancel re-bills is what seems to have gotten legal attention in the first place.
OR
Never underestimate the WRATH of a scorned woman. If a network owner or even a MAJOR affiliate with close inside network ties is going through a messy divorce, incriminating "EVIDENCE" could have conveniently shown up on someone's desk just for the revenge factor. All because the money settlement in the breakup is/was not what she wanted.
Then again, maybe someone has already come up with the NEXT big thing and is just wiping out some competition before they spring it. I would not be too surprised to learn that this could be the case as well. I mean, they rat out the big players, then have them spending most of their time and money tied up in legal issues while they start scooping up what's left of their networks and affiliates. Then when they launch, the players with the money and means to copy them will be too busy with legal issues to jump in right away. This way they will have the time needed to get the Lion's share. It's been done before throughout history with governments, organized crime, and business so why should we be immune to this kind tactic.
I would like to think that we as marketers are pretty close nit, but there seems to always be some bad apples.
Sincerely,
MT