Either way of course the AG is looking into the advertiser, they are the ones running the business. The ones you were promoting probably made millions of dollars too, it's not hard when you charging thousands of people daily at $80+ a pop.
Subpoenaed by Attorney General
- Thread starter TheLiquidWrench
- Start date
Either way of course the AG is looking into the advertiser, they are the ones running the business. The ones you were promoting probably made millions of dollars too, it's not hard when you charging thousands of people daily at $80+ a pop.
Slightly unrelated, but this is why I stress people to -among other measures- NOT go with 'Whois Privacy' services. Firms who push subpoenas can silence the subpoena receiver [whois provider] in ways that the actual defendant only finds out about trouble after all pretiming is lost and it's time for his door to be knocked down. Instead, I recommend everyone to just use fictitious identities, generated through www.fakenamegenerator.com while tied to an e-mail address that the domain owner accesses directly. In this case the owner will be the person being subpoena'd directly.
note; Some whois providers operate with e-mail addresses that are automated 1:1 relays to the client's personal mailbox. That's fine. The huge issue lies with whois providers who store and delegate communication with their own jurisdiction.
Lawyer up. Don't submit shit and when you do have the lawyers look over it. There are a lot of laws about what data can be seen in different cases and the fact that you weren't given any paperwork directly means that the network could be trying to scapegoat their affiliates by saying it wasn't them it was these people. Get a good lawyer and gather up all your information.
"Advertisement"/"This site is not affiliated with any newspaper publication".
Asterisks on any mention of the word "free", "trial", or any price references, which points to the bottom of the page which has the terms and conditions listed by the advertiser.
Just like Sopranos... Tony Soprano went to every good divorce attorney in the area so that bitch Carmella couldn't get a decent attorney.
Not exactly sure. I haven't received anything yet in the mail so I wasn't personally subpeonaed, and I'm not even sure if the network was. They did say they have until March 1st to turn over the info so they could just be rolling over on the affiliates without too much pressure from the AG.
no offense but if you came to wickedfire before calling your lawyer (which you should already have, but if you don't, substitute 'calling your' for 'finding a great') you're already on the path to failure, so i wouldn't worry..
since i'm sure you already got your lawyer up to speed tho, moving on.. that sucks..
So was the notice of subpoena specifically about Google bizopps or any other offers?
Is this just Google / Pacific Webworks case or the AG is looking into anything and everything, including non-rebill offers?
Is this just Google / Pacific Webworks case or the AG is looking into anything and everything, including non-rebill offers?
I had another member PM me saying that he received the same call from the same network. He believes that it was over the offer Everbright Smiles which is possible because I did run that as well. I just thought it was biz opps because I did bigger volume on those offers.
Everbright = CPX or Azoogle for whoever wants to know which Network.
Pick one ... i have a feeling i know which it is.
Pick one ... i have a feeling i know which it is.
I've gotten a ton of PM's asking what network it is, and I don't really see any harm in making it public. It was actually Market Leverage.
Nobody's asked yet, so I will.. how many fake testimonials did you have on your lander? A shitload?
