Martin Grunin - Facebook Ads Fraud - Bank Fraud - mgrunin

Status
Not open for further replies.


I have undeniable proof that I was not responsible for it. That it was not ME. Facebook can subpoena every one of my records, and they will also come to realization that I am not responsible for it. I would love to explain all the details here but it wouldn't be wise and it would also be met with too much skepticism for now. If Facebook asks kindly enough then I can dig up the name of the person that used me as a scapegoat.

Wow just wow
 
Wouldn't it have been smarter to send a $15,000 cheque, at least then there is some small possibility that FB could feasibly accept it. Also it shows willingness to take the matter seriously rather than mocking the judge with an obviously ridiculous $250 cheque.
 
If you read the judges reviews online from past cases he's a complete dick, his younger brother's in the supreme court and he isn't, and he's resentful.

lol, these are the things you want to read about the judge of your case.
But who wonders? This whole things is a demonstration that the worst case can become the default.
 
If you read the judges reviews online from past cases he's a complete dick



lol. I had no idea there were judge's reviews online. I always figured they're nice if you're well connected, or a dick if you're not.



Reviews for The Honorable Judge Dipshit

SuperGiant Bank: ***** Wonderful person... doesn't make us prove claims, or stick to dates of discovery... hell, he doesn't even make us follow motions to compel. We don't even have to provide evidence... we just say things and they're entered into the court as fact. In addition, he signs off on ex-parte motions like they're going out of style.

Joe Homeowner: ** He's a dick.
 
tumblr_m0ov5zXjR01ql8dcfo1_500.jpg
 
So I guess Martin's logic is:

$400 Lawyer + $250 check = all problems go away

Lol. I understand the concept of anchoring in negotiation, however it seems a lot more likely that facebook will get insulted and pursue the maximum penalty possible.
 
however it seems a lot more likely that facebook will get insulted and pursue the maximum penalty possible.
I can assure you this is not the case.

As CEO-in-fact of THE FACEBOOK I've decided to accept Brian-Robert:Costello's $650 with the proviso that he and MGrunin retract the $1million invoice.

I wish Martin all the best luck in cornering the Moldavian turnip market.
 
Sending a check is an error in its own, if it came from him. If they do get judgement they now have an account to levy by simply sending a letter. Further more they can petition the bank for any assets. So say if he has an auto loan through them they can seize any assets, savings accounts, whatever is owned by his person.

Hopefully it was sent from his Infact Guy's account.

Judges can and will use prejudice in cases. They already made some other judge take on the case now they are just mocking him and wasting his time. Remember in the end, he is the one decides what the penalties and restitution is.

Grunnin I always liked you. Sad to see this guy getting you slapped in face. Or more like hit by a semi truck.

The routing number on the check, 063100277, is BoA's FL routing number which would mean it probably is from his legal dream team.
 
What the fuck did I miss

SVjA6vb.jpg


2q1CkX0.jpg


p038r3h.gif


Also

You guys need really a reset from that double dick picture.
Let me help you with some tits and a single dick.

U6IpLNd.jpg


See? The double dick picture magically vanished out of your brain.

I'm moist now.
 
Wouldn't it have been smarter to send a $15,000 cheque, at least then there is some small possibility that FB could feasibly accept it. Also it shows willingness to take the matter seriously rather than mocking the judge with an obviously ridiculous $250 cheque.

that's hilarious. you can imagine the FB lawyer squinting to see if this offer is a joke or not . Such a low-ball offer..you can imagine in an Italian dialect saying 'you want 250,000? how about 250? Take it or leave it '
 
Status
Not open for further replies.