It's fucking painful posting here. It's painful, because I have to read some of the most mentally retarded stuff anywhere on the internet.
He's not right at all. What he said is demonstrably, empirically and logically false.
It's mind boggling (and it shouldn't be, because I know you're an idiot) that you don't understand this.
From where do you summon the minimum intelligence to not piss your pants constantly, or remember to breathe during the day?
Can we agree that Germany invading Poland is a bad thing?
Can we also agree that there's no chance of Germany invading Poland anytime in the future? If so, why? Right, globalization and the formation of the EU.
I can haz history lesson?
MATT STOP POSTING
YOU ARE LITERALLY THE DUMBEST PERSON ON THIS FORUM
Post hoc ergo propter hoc, Latin for "after this, therefore because of this", is a logical fallacy (of the questionable cause variety) that states "Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X." It is often shortened to simply post hoc. It is subtly different from the fallacy cum hoc ergo propter hoc, in which two things or events occur simultaneously or the chronological ordering is insignificant or unknown, also referred to as false cause, coincidental correlation, or correlation not causation.
yeah, because human nature goes hand in hand with logical theory.
It's fucking painful posting here. It's painful, because I have to read some of the most mentally retarded stuff anywhere on the internet.
The worst part is that many folks here opine relentlessly on matters they are ignorant about. You could literally spend all day demonstrating the foolishness of their posts to no avail. They will remain unabashedly proud in their ignorance. Antagonistic even.
Occasionally, I'll read posts by guys like Kiopa_Matt just to see them fail. It is like watching someone trip over their own two feet. Kinda sad, but kinda funny as long as they don't hurt themselves.
Fallacious remarks warrant a response. But some people are so relentless in making them that it's like listening to a mentally-retarded child insist over and over that 2 + 2 equal 47 and a potato.
At some point, you have to say, "Sounds good, kid." and walk away.![]()
Oh, fuck off.
How about instead of explaining to me how intelligent you guys are, you explain to me how Germany invading Poland again will never happen due to globalization and the EU, and how that's a bad thing?
So the current questions are:
1.) Is there any danger of Germany invading Poland in the future?
2.) If not, why not?
3.) Are the reasons given in #2 beneficial or detrimental to humanity as a whole?
Fallacious remarks warrant a response. But some people are so relentless in making them that it's like listening to a mentally-retarded child insist over and over that 2 + 2 equal 47 and a potato.
At some point, you have to say, "Sounds good, kid." and walk away.![]()
Correct, in the near future there is no real threat of Germany invading Poland.
Just as there was no threat of Germany invading Italy in 1937 or any other Axis countries.
But then again, Stalin thought there was no chance of Hitler invading since they had the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact.