Ever heard of the 1% idea? It governs social sites like Digg:
It's an emerging rule of thumb that suggests that if you get a group of 100 people online then one will create content, 10 will "interact" with it (commenting or offering improvements) and the other 89 will just view it.
http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1823959,00.htmlThe same rule governs forums. The numbers at WF is even worse because no one wants to invite competition - ever notice how its always the same half dozen members that post money making stuff? I'll be the first to admit I'm in the 10% part (probably on the less contributing end).
There's a ton of webmaster forums out there right now. They're all essentially the same and they exchange times when they rule the roost. Right now it's WF carrying the banton, but a few years ago it was SP. Anyone remember GeekVillage?
I used to post a lot of sensitive stuff on a forum (humorweb, now closed) awhile back, including my exact earnings and my strategy. The community was simply amazing. I think what got me to contribute was the culture. I know a lot of ex-members are on other forums now and we are all free riders. Not because we are jerks or anything but
What could set WF apart would be a private forum. Every would have to apply with a long introduction post. If you keep all your cards close to yourself, ya can't join. Hell, the forum could have performance reviews like General Electric - every month or so the forum would prune the 10% least contributing members. And maybe even cap the membership...
It's an emerging rule of thumb that suggests that if you get a group of 100 people online then one will create content, 10 will "interact" with it (commenting or offering improvements) and the other 89 will just view it.
http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1823959,00.htmlThe same rule governs forums. The numbers at WF is even worse because no one wants to invite competition - ever notice how its always the same half dozen members that post money making stuff? I'll be the first to admit I'm in the 10% part (probably on the less contributing end).
There's a ton of webmaster forums out there right now. They're all essentially the same and they exchange times when they rule the roost. Right now it's WF carrying the banton, but a few years ago it was SP. Anyone remember GeekVillage?
I used to post a lot of sensitive stuff on a forum (humorweb, now closed) awhile back, including my exact earnings and my strategy. The community was simply amazing. I think what got me to contribute was the culture. I know a lot of ex-members are on other forums now and we are all free riders. Not because we are jerks or anything but
What could set WF apart would be a private forum. Every would have to apply with a long introduction post. If you keep all your cards close to yourself, ya can't join. Hell, the forum could have performance reviews like General Electric - every month or so the forum would prune the 10% least contributing members. And maybe even cap the membership...