Ron Paul Supremacist WTF?

[SEO Monkey]

Your little blurb provided nothing aside from Don Black donating to him and him not returning the donations. Don Black organizing a money bomb is still just him donating. It's not like Don Black needed official campaign recognition to throw an event. As for it being an issue simply because it was "reported on" isn't true. Media reports on dumb shit all the time. Gets even worse when the media in question is some blogger.

My blurb includes a link to even more blurbs. For example:

9. Chuck Baldwin
Chuck Baldwin is a neo-Confederate New World Order conspiracy theorist who praises the confederacy and its leaders, Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson, and calls the Civil War the “War of Northern Aggression.” Baldwin writes a weekly column on the white supremacist site Vdare and is a proud supporter of American militia movements. Baldwin is also an Islamaphobe and homophobe.

Not only did Baldwin endorse Paul for president in 2007, but Paul returned the favor, endorsing Baldwin, who he calls his “friend,” for president in 2008. While Paul was quick to criticize Michele Bachmann for her Islamaphobia, he has said nothing about Baldwin’s, the man he endorsed for president. Here are some choice quotes from Baldwin:
I believe homosexuality is moral perversion and deserves no special consideration under the law.
I believe the South was right in the War Between the States, and I am not a racist.
I believe there is a conspiracy by elitists within government and big business to steal America’s independence.
The Muslim religion has been a bloody, murderous religion since its inception.

 

[Vhaeos]

We were talking about Don Black. Now you've went from Ron Paul being a racist because he's supported by racists to him being a racist because he's supported by a "neo-confederate?" (or supporting, fair enough.)

Find me proof that Baldwin is a racist. Baldwin is an asshole and I don't like the constitutional party but I've never heard him called a racist. Most of that is just typical religious nuttery.

 

[BlokBlok]

I wish I could vote for him twice now.

 

[Unarmed Gunman]

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Ron Paul is not capable of being a racist since he does not view people in groups, but rather as individuals.

Reread that shit a million times until it sets into your thick fucking skull.

Meanwhile Obama/Romney etc continue to support a drug war that predominantly affects minorities. Isn't that racist?

 

[Vhaeos]

Also if saying "The Muslim religion has been a bloody, murderous religion since its inception." is explicitly racist then Christopher Hitchen's was a total racist. Nevermind that Islam isn't a race..

 

[SEO Monkey]

We were talking about Don Black. Now you've went from Ron Paul being a racist because he's supported by racists to him being a racist because he's supported by a "neo-confederate?" (or supporting, fair enough.)

No, we weren't. You even specifically quoted my:

It goes well beyond "Don Black donating to him." If that's all there was to it, I doubt it would be an issue.

Top 10 Racist Ron Paul Friends And Supporters | Breaking News for Black America

I don't think any one thing mentioned in this thread should lead anyone to necessarily question that he's a racist or has some sort of racist agenda (even if that means he's just pandering to racist sentiment for support for his small govt. cause). It's the way these things coalesce.

And this stuff isn't 'new.' He defended the racist newsletters when running for Congress in TX almost 2 decades ago.

 

[Vhaeos]

No, we weren't.

Yes, I was. You mentioned Don Black in specific, so I rebutted that point in specific. I didn't want to address everything in your article because it's written by an idiot hack and would have taken forever. Therefore I touched on the only person you had actually mentioned up until that point - Don Black.

But oh well really. What subject we were on is of little consequence, and just because I was only on Don Black doesn't mean you weren't thinking about the article as a whole.

 

[SEO Monkey]

Reread that shit a million times until it sets into your thick fucking skull.

Meanwhile Obama/Romney etc continue to support a drug war that predominantly affects minorities. Isn't that racist?

Ron Paul has used the same response (that the drug war overwhelmingly hurts minorities). If he doesn't see people in groups, why then make this claim?

Besides, none of us hear can read his mind and actually know "how he sees people."

He is also against tearing down the social safety net, which would would dis proportionally hurt minorities. This actually ties into the southern strategy which Republicans adopted in the late 1960's.

 

[Unarmed Gunman]

Ron Paul has used the same response (that the drug war overwhelmingly hurts minorities). If he doesn't see people in groups, why then make this claim?

Does the war on drugs disproportionately affect minorities or not? Yes or no? Just because he doesn't treat people differently based on race doesn't mean he can't see race or read the statistics. You can't be that stupid. I'm going to have to assume you're just trolling here.

Besides, none of us hear can read his mind and actually know "how he sees people."

We don't need to be able to read his mind, we can look at his voting record over the last 30 years. Do you think Obama is racist? Or Bush? Clinton? They all spent billions of dollars to kill minorities and imprison people around the globe and here at home - all things that Ron Paul voted against doing.

He is also against tearing down the social safety net, which would would dis proportionally hurt minorities. This actually ties into the southern strategy which Republicans adopted in the late 1960's.

The social safety net actually effects the elderly of all races, more than anyone else. In fact, nothing has hurt minorities more than the entitlement society that has turned entire communities into dependents on the government. It's the difference between giving a man a fish or teaching a man to fish.

Please tell me you're not voting. It always worries me when I see such uninformed people voting. People like you are the reason our country keeps electing these murderous thieves into office.

 

[Dresden14]

All Hail Ron Paul!

 

[Vhaeos]

When will neo-nazi's get that their support doesn't help a candidate, in fact it does quite the opposite.

 

[d_diggler]

He is also against tearing down the social safety net, which would would dis proportionally hurt minorities. This actually ties into the southern strategy which Republicans adopted in the late 1960's.

Yeah, that social safety net is working pretty well.
























If you're looking to get elected.

 

[Dresden14]

When will neo-nazi's get that their support doesn't help a candidate, in fact it does quite the opposite.

When will the naive masses realize that voting doesn't exist; but provides an illusion of having an equal say when the Zionist occupied government predetermined your fate?

::begin hating dresden rants, ignore the sociopath, liberal comments below::

 

[Vhaeos]

Too bad your friends over at A3P aren't as fatalist as you. They've done far more harm than good getting involved in Paul's campaign.

 

[SEO Monkey]

Does the war on drugs disproportionately affect minorities or not? Yes or no? Just because he doesn't treat people differently based on race doesn't mean he can't see race or read the statistics. You can't be that stupid. I'm going to have to assume you're just trolling here.

The drug issue in general affects minorities, so yes, the war on drugs would affect them more. Ron Paul's Gilded Age version of America would only further drive poverty and drug use, legal or not. And this would overwhelmingly affect minorities.

We don't need to be able to read his mind, we can look at his voting record over the last 30 years. Do you think Obama is racist? Or Bush? Clinton? They all spent billions of dollars to kill minorities and imprison people around the globe and here at home - all things that Ron Paul voted against doing.

Yes, he is on record opposing the Civil and Voting Rights Act. I don't question whether Obama, Clinton, or Bush are racists because they don't have racist newsletters, oppose the Civil and Voting Rights Act, and they don't have a group of questionable racist friends who fund their campaigns or that they'v endorsed.

The social safety net actually effects the elderly of all races, more than anyone else. In fact, nothing has hurt minorities more than the entitlement society that has turned entire communities into dependents on the government. It's the difference between giving a man a fish or teaching a man to fish.

Nonsense. As our social safety net has been gutted, poverty and wealth disparity has only increased. We not only have greater wealth disparity than countries with stronger safety nets, we generally have less social mobility.

Please tell me you're not voting. It always worries me when I see such uninformed people voting. People like you are the reason our country keeps electing these murderous thieves into office.

So yes, I'm voting. Your list of unsupported claims and non-sequiturs doesn't really do anything to change the facts, or economic history.

 

[danke]

Not good. How easy could it be for someone to pose as anonymous and push out bullshit?

Did I really just read someone ask that?

 

[Zaino]

Anonymous isn't organized, it's not even an organization for that matter. Every group within "anonymous" will have their own opinions and causes. Even when people put out videos or claim to represent "anonymous," they are not representing the entire population that calls themselves "anonymous."

All of "anonymous'"actions are not coordinated.

So they are from the govt.?

 

[sixthcutuan]

Ron Paul sucks.

 

[d_diggler]

Primus sucks

Fixed that for you.

 

[Unarmed Gunman]

The drug issue in general affects minorities, so yes, the war on drugs would affect them more.

Yet Ron Paul is the only one that wants to end the war on drugs, and somehow he is racist. He wants to release hundreds of thousands of minorities from prison tomorrow, yet he's racist? Yeah ok.

It would seem a racist would want to adopt policies that would be harmful for minorities such as locking them up for petty drug crimes, keeping them dependent on government handouts so that they can't take care of themselves, promoting the destruction of the family unit via government programs that reward single mothers and promoting the genocide of the race through mass abortion. All of these are policies supported by the democratic party and many in the republican party as well.

If you think the status quo is so good for minorities, how do you explain the destruction of the family unit and legacy of dependency that is present in so many minority communities now?