BLG - Daily Web 2.0's-PR4+Linkwheel-Xrumer-Article Directories-Blog Comments
- Thread starter jschmidli
- Start date
- Status
advice on choosing projects..
I have an 11 year old money site with just under a thousand backlinks.
I have about 150 assorted tier 2 sites pointing there and have been DFB to all those tier 2s for about a month. No DFB to the money site yet.
My plan is to build a strong backlink net to those tier 2 sites using DFB and BLG (& i just got SB, but it scares me to do any quantity yet with it).
Would it be better to use BLG to just build 4 day projects for a while then hitting them all with single projects, or should i just blast the money site directly?
Since joining last week, i planned on doing 1 - 4 day project per week at the money site with the other 3 days individual profile & commenting projects at the tier 2s.
My feeling is I should spend a month or 2 building strength of the tier 2s while slowly building backlinks to the money site. Once I have 2000 backlinks to the money site and link velocity up there, then hit it with everything i got.
I am hovering at the #6 spot for my one of main keywords and in the 40s for my other 2.
Thoughts?
I have an 11 year old money site with just under a thousand backlinks.
I have about 150 assorted tier 2 sites pointing there and have been DFB to all those tier 2s for about a month. No DFB to the money site yet.
My plan is to build a strong backlink net to those tier 2 sites using DFB and BLG (& i just got SB, but it scares me to do any quantity yet with it).
Would it be better to use BLG to just build 4 day projects for a while then hitting them all with single projects, or should i just blast the money site directly?
Since joining last week, i planned on doing 1 - 4 day project per week at the money site with the other 3 days individual profile & commenting projects at the tier 2s.
My feeling is I should spend a month or 2 building strength of the tier 2s while slowly building backlinks to the money site. Once I have 2000 backlinks to the money site and link velocity up there, then hit it with everything i got.
I am hovering at the #6 spot for my one of main keywords and in the 40s for my other 2.
Thoughts?
What are people's thoughts on the web 2.0 footprint left by using the user name in the url?
For example you end up with quite a few of the web 2.0 sites with a url along the lines of
345doll4dr.xxx.com
where xxx is each of the various web 2.0s names. In addition, for the few that don't use this url structure your user name would be 345doll4dr. To me that is a pretty big footprint to leave in your linking structure. I would be really interested to hear a few of the experienced SEO guys thoughts about this.
I signed up for the trial and really liked the product a lot but cancelled after the week because of this issue. If this could be fixed I would sign back up tomorrow.
For example you end up with quite a few of the web 2.0 sites with a url along the lines of
345doll4dr.xxx.com
where xxx is each of the various web 2.0s names. In addition, for the few that don't use this url structure your user name would be 345doll4dr. To me that is a pretty big footprint to leave in your linking structure. I would be really interested to hear a few of the experienced SEO guys thoughts about this.
I signed up for the trial and really liked the product a lot but cancelled after the week because of this issue. If this could be fixed I would sign back up tomorrow.
Yeah, I had spinnertext enabled but it wasn't used for a lot of the properties. I asked Joe about this and apparently its because the web 2.0s won't allow you to choose your subdomain and so your user name is used instead.
Seems to me the solution would be for each property to cycle though a couple of different user names... but then keeping that all straight for reusing properties probably wont work to well... Well I guess it COULD work but it would have to store a lot more variables
Im back a day early with some results we have seen.
Keyword1
root (partial match to keyword targeted) = pos 115
targeted internal page (partial match to keyword targeted)= pos NA/not in top1k
root - 113
targeted internal page = still dancing in the 300's - 400's, was ranking nowhere in the top 1k before.
Keyword2
root (partial match) = pos 37
targeted internal page (exact match) = pos 406
root = pos 33
targeted internal page = 350's now and again is still dancing a bit. also i would like to note in fairness that this ranking: targeted internal page (exact match) = pos 406 was a temporary flash, after i made the initial post, later that day i checked again and it was no where to be found in the top 1k until just a day ago.
I would like to add also the site is only 3 months old in a rather established niche.
How tough is the compeition?
The competition we are up against for our terms are home depot, lowes, target. ect. It took around $700 in high end links(quality incontent links ect.) to take pos 1 for another keyword with the same/similar competition with that site. The average commission per sale for the site is $150+ and does several sales a month from 20-30uv/day, we have over 30 more keywords approx that have the same/similar and higher production potential.
After we did the initial project for the above two terms in my first post we ran 30 web 2.0's to the root url that we had another productive keyword dancing between pos 12-10 and blasted those with their blog comments. We are currently in pos 9 and less than 20% of the web 2.0 links have been indexed. While running BLG to the site for both pages targeted(root & internal page) i made sure no other links were being picked up for approx a week prior and havent had any other links getting indexed since, other than BLG links.
My evaluation:
Will this help your rankings? yes.
Considering the results we have been seeing from BLG, I definately recommend this to any SEO aff marketer. Would i build an entire link profile using BLG? ... probably not due to the limited link lists (as a footprint would eventually be left behind if used over and over to the same page and/or keywords), which they are currently working on. However, also using BLG to your heavy hitting tier one links will drastically reduce your spending and time while beefing them up, we already have been seeing results with that on another site as well.
Overall I feel BLG is great value for the money spent on it and is a good addition/asset to our overall seo planning.
Im looking forward to targeting our less competitive long tails and a few local seo sites/terms, im sure BLG will kick some ass for those niches/keywords with no additional link building than what we have already done. I will leave more updates as we go.
Cheers!
Keyword1
root (partial match to keyword targeted) = pos 115
targeted internal page (partial match to keyword targeted)= pos NA/not in top1k
root - 113
targeted internal page = still dancing in the 300's - 400's, was ranking nowhere in the top 1k before.
Keyword2
root (partial match) = pos 37
targeted internal page (exact match) = pos 406
root = pos 33
targeted internal page = 350's now and again is still dancing a bit. also i would like to note in fairness that this ranking: targeted internal page (exact match) = pos 406 was a temporary flash, after i made the initial post, later that day i checked again and it was no where to be found in the top 1k until just a day ago.
I would like to add also the site is only 3 months old in a rather established niche.
How tough is the compeition?
The competition we are up against for our terms are home depot, lowes, target. ect. It took around $700 in high end links(quality incontent links ect.) to take pos 1 for another keyword with the same/similar competition with that site. The average commission per sale for the site is $150+ and does several sales a month from 20-30uv/day, we have over 30 more keywords approx that have the same/similar and higher production potential.
After we did the initial project for the above two terms in my first post we ran 30 web 2.0's to the root url that we had another productive keyword dancing between pos 12-10 and blasted those with their blog comments. We are currently in pos 9 and less than 20% of the web 2.0 links have been indexed. While running BLG to the site for both pages targeted(root & internal page) i made sure no other links were being picked up for approx a week prior and havent had any other links getting indexed since, other than BLG links.
My evaluation:
Will this help your rankings? yes.
Considering the results we have been seeing from BLG, I definately recommend this to any SEO aff marketer. Would i build an entire link profile using BLG? ... probably not due to the limited link lists (as a footprint would eventually be left behind if used over and over to the same page and/or keywords), which they are currently working on. However, also using BLG to your heavy hitting tier one links will drastically reduce your spending and time while beefing them up, we already have been seeing results with that on another site as well.
Overall I feel BLG is great value for the money spent on it and is a good addition/asset to our overall seo planning.
Im looking forward to targeting our less competitive long tails and a few local seo sites/terms, im sure BLG will kick some ass for those niches/keywords with no additional link building than what we have already done. I will leave more updates as we go.
Cheers!
Last edited:
Back with more results, we did 15 web 2.0s and pumped a pile of blog comments and Xrumer profiles to those to a 2 month old site, damn near an exact match domain.
Keyword1 was position 79 before we used blg, it has been 8 days since creation of the web 2.0s with 16/18 it produced indexed and the site is currently in pos 55
Keyword2 was pos 83 and is now position 52
just to give you guys an idea how difficult these keywords are, the cost per click on them is $18/click and 16$/click if you were to run a ppc campaign with G.
Pretty damn impressive if you ask me.:thumbsup:
Will keep you guys updated on anymore movement on our first test posted above.
Merry Xmas!
Keyword1 was position 79 before we used blg, it has been 8 days since creation of the web 2.0s with 16/18 it produced indexed and the site is currently in pos 55
Keyword2 was pos 83 and is now position 52
just to give you guys an idea how difficult these keywords are, the cost per click on them is $18/click and 16$/click if you were to run a ppc campaign with G.
Pretty damn impressive if you ask me.:thumbsup:
Will keep you guys updated on anymore movement on our first test posted above.
Merry Xmas!
Last edited:
Spinning Articles
Hi
Just to clarify - is the same spun article then posted to all the web 2.0 properties - or will each web 2.0 get a different spun article?
J
Hi
Just to clarify - is the same spun article then posted to all the web 2.0 properties - or will each web 2.0 get a different spun article?
J
i've just pay for trial ... by paypal N° 1P911080JE233491F
i'm still waiting about your validation to test your solution
bye
tontonkeke
i'm still waiting about your validation to test your solution
bye
tontonkeke
If you buy this and DFB, you don't need to ever visit the BST again
Quick question. If you get 2,000 xrumers per day with this package do you still need dfb?
Well, I have the 2k/day DFB package. And I use DFB to basically backlink all of my backlinks
I'd recommend both.
With BLG you can do a 3 or 4 day project, then schedule 3 or 4 days of DFB to each BLG's daily project. You can build some pretty cool tiers using both of these tools.
- Status