WikiLeaks Revenge: Mastercard.com taken down by hackerz
- Thread starter RobinX
- Start date
They're retards. They won't understand until it directly affects them. They don't even understand they're endorsing crime.
According to some morons here, whether something is a crime all depends on who's doing it.
First they came for Palin...
First they came for Palin...
Operation payback is retarded, and here's why. Their primary goal, as stated in the above video is to fight against laws seeking to restrict access to or censor content on, the internet.
Very well.
So why are they attacking CCs? Why are they leaking classified documents of non-home governments, including state secrets and those dealing with military operations? Say what you want, but the only people being helped by this are terrorists, state-sponsored and otherwise. For all of you applauding these vindictive attacks against Mastercard and Visa, wait until your business gets hit because they either lose the ability or the confidence to process their transactions over the internet. These guys keep going and we're all fucked.
Very well.
So why are they attacking CCs? Why are they leaking classified documents of non-home governments, including state secrets and those dealing with military operations? Say what you want, but the only people being helped by this are terrorists, state-sponsored and otherwise. For all of you applauding these vindictive attacks against Mastercard and Visa, wait until your business gets hit because they either lose the ability or the confidence to process their transactions over the internet. These guys keep going and we're all fucked.
I'm not supporting them necessarily, but the earlier comment made it sound like she was a random choice and this was an obviously partisan action. I was making it clear that this was not the case.
It's a bit hilarious to hear you cite 'free speech' though - even if you're refuting something I didn't say.
I wasn't citing free speech to argue with you.
I was wondering what their rationale was for attacking Palin. Surely it was something less hypocritical than "She said mean things about Assange" and something less partisan than "She's the Republican we love to hate!"
Guess it was wrong of me to assume Assange supporters are intellectually capable.
If you want the rationale for attacking Palin, here it is: She's influential, and she's supporting the execution of a reporter for reporting 100% accurate facts. She is advocating that the US forgo the freedom of press for the sake of convenience.I wasn't citing free speech to argue with you.
I was wondering what their rationale was for attacking Palin. Surely it was something less hypocritical than "She said mean things about Assange" and something less partisan than "She's the Republican we love to hate!"
Guess it was wrong of me to assume Assange supporters are intellectually capable.
Her ignorant ass proclaims she supports the constitution even as she spits on the grave of those that wrote it.
In advocating she executing she advocates censorship. In trying to censor wikileaks she becomes a target. She is trying to permanently remove Assange's right to any speech whatsovever(via death) and therefore anonymous doesn't give a flying fuck if SarahPac is down.
She is a murder advocating hypocritical whore who couldn't understand the Bill of Rights if it was read to her in an audio book.
</drunk rant>
While she is an idiot, so are the hackers targeting her.
I simply don't see where freedom of press protects solicitation of criminal activity.
It's not a good enough reason to target her when you are attempting to defend Assange.
