Why don't you just kick a tiger in the balls?



1248673109092.jpg
 
i'm excited to see what happens this is a pretty serious issue if it is censorship and not the DDOS question.. *waits for press AT&T press release*
 
I just got off of Live Support with an ATT rep... here's what she said:

The web site http://img.4chan.org. has been blackholed – the IP tech support contact was informed that the site would be blocked before it was blocked. The Technical contact for the IP owner was sent an e-mail. From the network security team. I have included the contact that the customer would need to contact. This is out of our support area and it is up to the site owner to get it resolved. ip route 207.126.64.181 255.255.255.255 192.0.2.1 tag 666 = Blackholed ip route 207.126.64.182 255.255.255.255 192.0.2.1 tag 666 = Blackholed Here is the contact info the customer should contact. Technical Contact : Administrator, Chan pc4zj3qn4hh@networksolutionsprivateregistration.com ATTN: 4CHAN.ORG c/o Network Solutions P.O. Box 447 Herndon, VA20172-0447 Phone: 570-708-8780
Click to expand...
 
[high=php]
<?php

function checkATT() {
$ipaddy = $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'];
/*echo $ipaddy;
echo ip_in_range($ipaddy, '12.20.0.0/8');
echo ip_in_range($ipaddy, '76.192.0.0/10');
echo ip_in_range($ipaddy, '68.88.0.0/13');
echo ip_in_range($ipaddy, '75.0.0.0/10');
echo ip_in_range($ipaddy, '99.128.0.0/10'); */
if (ip_in_range($ipaddy, '209.0.0.0/10') ||ip_in_range($ipaddy, '99.128.0.0/10') || ip_in_range($ipaddy, '75.0.0.0/10') || ip_in_range($ipaddy, '68.88.0.0/13') || ip_in_range($ipaddy, '76.192.0.0/10') || ip_in_range($ipaddy, '12.20.0.0/8')) {
echo 'Link to informative article or redirect to same.';
} else {
echo '<!-- Probably nothing here, to not bother non-ATT customers. -->';
}

}

/*
* ip_in_range.php - Function to determine if an IP is located in a
* specific range as specified via several alternative
* formats.
*
* Network ranges can be specified as:
* 1. Wildcard format: 1.2.3.*
* 2. CIDR format: 1.2.3/24 OR 1.2.3.4/255.255.255.0
* 3. Start-End IP format: 1.2.3.0-1.2.3.255
*
* Return value BOOLEAN : ip_in_range($ip, $range);
*
* Copyright 2008: Paul Gregg <pgregg@pgregg.com>
* 10 January 2008
* Version: 1.2
*
* Source website: Index of /projects/php/ip_in_range
* Version 1.2
*
* This software is Donationware - if you feel you have benefited from
* the use of this tool then please consider a donation. The value of
* which is entirely left up to your discretion.
* Paul Gregg - Donation
*
* Please do not remove this header, or source attibution from this file.
*/


// decbin32
// In order to simplify working with IP addresses (in binary) and their
// netmasks, it is easier to ensure that the binary strings are padded
// with zeros out to 32 characters - IP addresses are 32 bit numbers
Function decbin32 ($dec) {
return str_pad(decbin($dec), 32, '0', STR_PAD_LEFT);
}

// ip_in_range
// This function takes 2 arguments, an IP address and a "range" in several
// different formats.
// Network ranges can be specified as:
// 1. Wildcard format: 1.2.3.*
// 2. CIDR format: 1.2.3/24 OR 1.2.3.4/255.255.255.0
// 3. Start-End IP format: 1.2.3.0-1.2.3.255
// The function will return true if the supplied IP is within the range.
// Note little validation is done on the range inputs - it expects you to
// use one of the above 3 formats.
Function ip_in_range($ip, $range) {
if (strpos($range, '/') !== false) {
// $range is in IP/NETMASK format
list($range, $netmask) = explode('/', $range, 2);
if (strpos($netmask, '.') !== false) {
// $netmask is a 255.255.0.0 format
$netmask = str_replace('*', '0', $netmask);
$netmask_dec = ip2long($netmask);
return ( (ip2long($ip) & $netmask_dec) == (ip2long($range) & $netmask_dec) );
} else {
// $netmask is a CIDR size block
// fix the range argument
$x = explode('.', $range);
while(count($x)<4) $x[] = '0';
list($a,$b,$c,$d) = $x;
$range = sprintf("%u.%u.%u.%u", empty($a)?'0':$a, empty($b)?'0':$b,empty($c)?'0':$c,empty($d)?'0':$d);
$range_dec = ip2long($range);
$ip_dec = ip2long($ip);

# Strategy 1 - Create the netmask with 'netmask' 1s and then fill it to 32 with 0s
#$netmask_dec = bindec(str_pad('', $netmask, '1') . str_pad('', 32-$netmask, '0'));

# Strategy 2 - Use math to create it
$wildcard_dec = pow(2, (32-$netmask)) - 1;
$netmask_dec = ~ $wildcard_dec;

return (($ip_dec & $netmask_dec) == ($range_dec & $netmask_dec));
}
} else {
// range might be 255.255.*.* or 1.2.3.0-1.2.3.255
if (strpos($range, '*') !==false) { // a.b.*.* format
// Just convert to A-B format by setting * to 0 for A and 255 for B
$lower = str_replace('*', '0', $range);
$upper = str_replace('*', '255', $range);
$range = "$lower-$upper";
}

if (strpos($range, '-')!==false) { // A-B format
list($lower, $upper) = explode('-', $range, 2);
$lower_dec = (float)sprintf("%u",ip2long($lower));
$upper_dec = (float)sprintf("%u",ip2long($upper));
$ip_dec = (float)sprintf("%u",ip2long($ip));
return ( ($ip_dec>=$lower_dec) && ($ip_dec<=$upper_dec) );
}

echo 'Range argument is not in 1.2.3.4/24 or 1.2.3.4/255.255.255.0 format';
return false;
}

}
checkATT();
[/high]

Code: 
# AT&T Blocking, fuck AT&T

<IfModule mod_rewrite.c>
  
RewriteEngine on 
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_HOST} 12.20.0
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !att.html$ 
RewriteRule \.*$ /att.html [R=301,L] 

RewriteCond %{REMOTE_HOST} 76.192.0
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !att.html$ 
RewriteRule \.*$ /att.html [R=301,L] 

RewriteCond %{REMOTE_HOST} 68.88.0
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !att.html$ 
RewriteRule \.*$ /att.html [R=301,L] 

RewriteCond %{REMOTE_HOST} 75.0.0
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !att.html$ 
RewriteRule \.*$ /att.html [R=301,L] 

RewriteCond %{REMOTE_HOST} 99.128.0
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !att.html$ 
RewriteRule \.*$ /att.html [R=301,L] 

</IfModule>
moar:

Code: 
http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/94pf2/att_is_now_blocking_all_access_to_img4chanorg/c0bf7y6
 
sgtryan said:
AT&T has removed the block.
Click to expand...

If I were an AT&T tech with serious boredom, I would have redirected the nameserver request to Fuck 4Chan, Fuck it Hard

But still like other's have said, its a damn slippery slope when you start censoring the internet, if they're gona go that far, they might as well whip open google images and block every site that pops up on a 'lolicon' search.
 
erect said:
Cocks & Cumcast will be soon to follow if AT&T gets away with it.

I hope those fuckers can get organized enough to actually do something about this. I almost wished I was a /b/tard at this moment.

Now ... the question I have is since they are openly censoring a specific site due to it's content, doesn't this make them assume responsibility for censoring all pedo content or face serious lawsuits?

Slippery slope indeed. I can see wickedfire being on the short list of sites censored soon enough.
Click to expand...

Depending on the method of blocking (I'm guessing probably via their nameserver lookup), that would further express the benefits of using a third party DNS. Course they'll probably say using any DNS other than what they provide you is a violation of service agreement if they haven't already.
 
I'm surprised they still try to block shit, have they not realised it's an impossibility to censor teh webz.
 
kblessinggr said:
If I were an AT&T tech with serious boredom, I would have redirected the nameserver request to Fuck 4Chan, Fuck it Hard

But still like other's have said, its a damn slippery slope when you start censoring the internet, if they're gona go that far, they might as well whip open google images and block every site that pops up on a 'lolicon' search.
Click to expand...

Have I ever mentioned that you're really stupid to even think of owning that domain?
 
Interesting: Now where am I going to get my morning dose of Hate, Racism, Pedo, Animal Cruelty, Pulled apart Assholes, Diseased Genitals, Chopped Up Dead Bodies, Maimed Children, and of course the relentless Glorification of Retardation.

WTF am I gonna do now save me /b/

Anon will do something...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom