Where does WF stand on WikiLeaks?
- Thread starter redwings0921
- Start date
Personally... I'm against Wikileaks. But you guys can do and read whatever you like.
If there is an official WickedFire position on Wikileaks, its NEUTRAL.
If there is an official WickedFire position on Wikileaks, its NEUTRAL.
If its true then I'm not surprised... Us Juden are pretty fuckin awesome in the deal making dept. Other countries are just jealous that they couldn't Jew-down Wikileaks first. L'CHAIM BITCHES!
I re-read the title spooge:
Erm... No Israeli embassy IN Tel-Aviv.... Furthermore, Lebanon, like all surrounding Arab countries (minus Egypt) won't even officially acknowledge Israel's statehood. Which is what the Arab neighboring countries used as part of their "reasons" for attacking Israel in 1948 to begin with... soooooo... no embassy. If the locations don't exist, then where the fuck were these "deals" struck?
1948 Arab
no. If nobody knows its considered "vital infrastructure" by the US, they aren't going to attack it. Publishing this cable was like giving our enemies a menu at a restaurant.
This. The inmates run the asylum here, which is partially what makes it so fun to provoke them.
(O_o)
H̨̼̩͐̑͆̀̚&
Some would say not committing homicide when you might want to would be surrendering your internal concept of morality to some bureaucrat making laws.
Disregard media, acquire truth.
Personally this whole charade turns my stomach a bit, not the basis of wikileaks or the documents in question but media frenzy and attention surrounding it.
People might say Assange is an enemy of the state, but he's been preaching of transparency in journalism for twenty years now. He fancies himself an intellectual, has admitted and been convicted of international wire fraud in the past. He alone is not wikileaks, and jailing him or hurting him does nothing to their hamper their cause.
With that said, my opinion Assange is being used as a bit of a puppet to ignore the real issues brought up within this incident. I'm not one who believes that transparency in government is required, mankind is not perfect, war occurs for a number of reasons, and it's our responsibility as a world power to protect the intelligence we gather and the commentary of our elected officials regarding matters of policy.
The real issue to be addressed is how we handle the data we collect, if it was able to get into the hands of such extremists it was probably long available to other world governments by way of intelligence.
The fact that everyone allows themselves to become entirely distracted with this load of bullocks is more a problem than the leaking of the information itself. I haven't sought out to read the documents as they are of no interest to me regardless of content personally.
All of the information released was vetted by main stream media outlets prior to it becoming public. The head official for the Pentagon and every respectable member of office believes the information to be slightly embarrassing at worst and agree it will not adversely effect foreign relationships.
Get over it and get back to refreshing stats...
Personally this whole charade turns my stomach a bit, not the basis of wikileaks or the documents in question but media frenzy and attention surrounding it.
People might say Assange is an enemy of the state, but he's been preaching of transparency in journalism for twenty years now. He fancies himself an intellectual, has admitted and been convicted of international wire fraud in the past. He alone is not wikileaks, and jailing him or hurting him does nothing to their hamper their cause.
With that said, my opinion Assange is being used as a bit of a puppet to ignore the real issues brought up within this incident. I'm not one who believes that transparency in government is required, mankind is not perfect, war occurs for a number of reasons, and it's our responsibility as a world power to protect the intelligence we gather and the commentary of our elected officials regarding matters of policy.
The real issue to be addressed is how we handle the data we collect, if it was able to get into the hands of such extremists it was probably long available to other world governments by way of intelligence.
The fact that everyone allows themselves to become entirely distracted with this load of bullocks is more a problem than the leaking of the information itself. I haven't sought out to read the documents as they are of no interest to me regardless of content personally.
All of the information released was vetted by main stream media outlets prior to it becoming public. The head official for the Pentagon and every respectable member of office believes the information to be slightly embarrassing at worst and agree it will not adversely effect foreign relationships.
Get over it and get back to refreshing stats...
What I have found odd is that I don't know a single person who is against wikileaks but people who are against it are all over the internet. Though to be honest, I don't know many people who even know what wikileaks is.
However, I can't help but notice that all the virtually every argument against them is sensationalist and paranoid.
I also can't see how anyone would not want them to publish the Bank of America cables they are sitting on. Someone needs to stick it to the fucking bastards in the bank industry.
However, I can't help but notice that all the virtually every argument against them is sensationalist and paranoid.
I also can't see how anyone would not want them to publish the Bank of America cables they are sitting on. Someone needs to stick it to the fucking bastards in the bank industry.
Amen.
I'd buy you a beer if you were giving this rant at a bar. Keep up the good work.