Trump for US President?

Poor baby. Let me call the wambulance. I didn't respond to your post because you're an idiot. Perhaps if you made a point instead of hurling stupid insults I'd take the time to respond to it.

Actually I made several points regarding Trump being a showman charaletan and you didn't respond to any of them you disingenuous dumb fuck. Keep sucking that Trump dick you sack of shit.
 


Actually I made several points regarding Trump being a showman charaletan and you didn't respond to any of them you disingenuous dumb fuck. Keep sucking that Trump dick you sack of shit.

OK, I just noticed your post. (Sorry, but your posts just don't stand out.) You seem quite jealous about Trump's success. Who cares if he made bank from licensing his brand? You sound like just another thousandaire whining from his mom's basement.
 
OK, I just noticed your post. (Sorry, but your posts just don't stand out.) You seem quite jealous about Trump's success. Who cares if he made bank from licensing his brand? You sound like just another thousandaire whining from his mom's basement.

There is nothing to be jealous about regarding Trump, and nothing I said suggested that I was. My hate was directed towards you and what you stand for (not allowing women to vote, etc), and not at Trump. Trump inherited his wealth from his father, he isn't a self made man. Also his billionaire status is very much in doubt as I had already pointed out. You addressed none of these perfectly valid arguments, and instead decided to pull something out of your ass about me being jealous.

Ultimately the point of my post was that you're a rube that got fooled by someone who is a showman on tv pretending to be a businessman; not to rage against Trump's wealth. You're clearly not happy that you got owned so hard which is why you're playing the jealousy card now.

Don't try to twist things you pathetic anti semitic misogynistic sack of shit. Why are you even posting on Jon's forum if you hate Jews so much?
 
^^^ If I pointed out that Mormons were involved in certain political/social movements, would that be considered hateful? Would I be called anti-Mormon? Of course, not. They're just facts. Perhaps you'd call them hate facts but they're facts nonetheless.

There is not a truth existing which I fear or would wish unknown to the whole world.
- Thomas Jefferson
 
^^^ If I pointed out that Mormons were involved in certain political/social movements, would that be considered hateful? Would I be called anti-Mormon? Of course, not. They're just facts. Perhaps you'd call them hate facts but they're facts nonetheless.

- Thomas Jefferson

You're the kind of piece of shit who thinks women shouldn't be allowed to vote as if they're sub human, I think it puts everything you say about jews into doubt.

Besides why are you jealous about the success of the Jewish people? You just said earlier that I shouldn't be jealous of Trump's success even though I never was jealous in the first place. I like how you play that jealousy card only when it best suits you, but then you cry like a bitch about Jewish conspiracies.
 
You're the kind of piece of shit who thinks women shouldn't be allowed to vote as if they're sub human, I think it puts everything you say about jews into doubt.

Besides why are you jealous about the success of the Jewish people? You just said earlier that I shouldn't be jealous of Trump's success even though I never was jealous in the first place. I like how you play that jealousy card only when it best suits you, but then you cry like a bitch about Jewish conspiracies.

Women aren't sub-human but they vote for touch-feely issues and love big government. That's why I think they shouldn't be allowed to vote. I also don't think people who don't own property should be allowed to vote, even if they're WHITE!

I'm not jealous about financially successful Jews. However, I do have a problem with Jewish involvement in movements I consider detrimental to Western civilization, e.g.:

feminism
socialism/communism
open immigration
thought crime legislation
the Holodomor

and so on.
 
Women aren't sub-human but they vote for touch-feely issues and love big government. That's why I think they shouldn't be allowed to vote. I also don't think people who don't own property should be allowed to vote, even if they're WHITE!

I'm not jealous about financially successful Jews. However, I do have a problem with Jewish involvement in movements I consider detrimental to Western civilization, e.g.:

feminism
socialism/communism
open immigration
thought crime legislation
the Holodomor

and so on.

You're making a lot of generalized broad statements about both women and Jews, hence you're a complete dipshit.

Also I'm not really with you on denying people the right to vote simply because they don't own real estate.

By the Holohomor, are you referring to the Ukraine famine-gencide or is there a secondary meaning?
 
You're making a lot of generalized broad statements about both women and Jews, hence you're a complete dipshit.

Also I'm not really with you on denying people the right to vote simply because they don't own real estate.

By the Holohomor, are you referring to the Ukraine famine-gencide or is there a secondary meaning?

Should I have wasted my time providing sources for all of my claims? (Believe you me, the claims are not unsubstantiated.) I'm sure you would have just called me another name and not checked the sources. That's your style.

I don't believe in democracy but if you're going to have one only property owners should vote. Otherwise, the non-property owners have an incentive to expropriate the property owners. I agree with HL Mencken:

Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.

As far as I know, there is only one Holodomor.

Go ahead and paste your template reply: blah blah blah Nazi. blah blah racist blah blah blah anti-semite. blah blah.
 
Hillary wins in 2016. It's already been decided. It'll be a hope and change moment a la Obama in '08, with the first female US president ushering in a new era of equality, girl power, blah blah blah, bippity hippity doop.

Your votes don't matter. It's all bread and circuses - but millions of useful idiots will participate and celebrate their "victory" when the preferred mascot of their handlers takes office.

Ignore politics, acquire currency.

I could be wrong, but I wouldn't bet on it.
 
Hispanics vote overwhelmingly Democrat. There's no point in pandering them to get a few percentage points of the vote. Republicans need to get a larger percentage of the white vote. Running on issues like building a wall, keeping jobs in America, repealing Obamacare, and ending Common Core are directed at gaining a larger white vote.

I could be wrong, but I feel like that voter bloc is even smaller than when candidates major and non were going hardcore after that particular "white voter" in the past. Ron Paul, Pat Buchanan, etc tried that and got nowhere. Hell, even David Duke ran for President in 1992 and had more support than you would expect (ie >0). I don't think anyone would support him today.. or George Wallace. If it were such a winner, I doubt the Pauls would have worked so hard to distance themselves over the last 8 years.

The short-sighted thing (to me) is this: having views on immigration isn't just pandering to or going against Hispanics. There's a huge block of white voters, and not just liberals, who are offended or at least disagree with Trump. Just as very few people will ever be personally affected by gay marriage or abortion, they still have opinions based on principle or emotions/family. I know plenty of "Buy American, Keep Jobs in America" types who are hardcore Democrats, and even if they weren't would be very uncomfortable associating with any of the implied racial aspects. You also risk alienating moderate or intellectual conservative voters.

When it comes to down to it a lot of people vote against their self-interests or at the very least have no principles.

Trump's also pretty bad on economic freedom (in addition to that whole protectionism thing) and liberty issues. This is a guy who used government favors and influence, eminent domain property takings, etc to build his wealth. Billionaire welfare recipients who scapegoat groups of people to appeal to poor white people don't do much for me. They might do something for said poor white people, but I think that's a relatively small group.
 
Trump is Marine Le Pen, Syriza/Golden Dawn, Sweden Democrats, Danish National Party, UKIP of America.

This is a revolt!

Not quite there yet, most of the populist nationalist parties in Europe hover around 20%, doesn't need much of a crisis to put them over 30%.

The unwillingness to learn will forever be the downfall of the elites. Does it have to be spelled out?

We lived through our own booming 20s in the early to mid 00s, then we had our depression which we're still in, even with our New Deal (the ECB/FED quantitative easing), now we are unfortunately entering our 30s.

Where is the powder keg of our time? Greece, when they default and turn to Russia?

Will people learn or not, it's like the elite just can't enjoy the spoils of their victory, they have to squeeze everything out of their subjects.

Trump is the voice of the disillusioned white middle class. Diversity and globalization has hit a little too close to home now. Maybe even dad lost his IT job to some foreigner, maybe daughter got mugged by 'diversity'. Maybe it is too much this time.

Maybe it isn't Trump this time, but damn look at the story, the people are saying No More.
 
Women aren't sub-human but they vote for touch-feely issues and love big government. That's why I think they shouldn't be allowed to vote. I also don't think people who don't own property should be allowed to vote, even if they're WHITE!

I'm not jealous about financially successful Jews. However, I do have a problem with Jewish involvement in movements I consider detrimental to Western civilization, e.g.:

feminism
socialism/communism
open immigration
thought crime legislation
the Holodomor

and so on.

You're an AnCap against open immigration? Seriously? How do you expect to keep brown people out when the only borders that exist are those put in place by a handful of property owners in a few random locations?
 
Hillary wins in 2016. It's already been decided. It'll be a hope and change moment a la Obama in '08, with the first female US president ushering in a new era of equality, girl power, blah blah blah, bippity hippity doop.

Your votes don't matter. It's all bread and circuses - but millions of useful idiots will participate and celebrate their "victory" when the preferred mascot of their handlers takes office.

Ignore politics, acquire currency.

I could be wrong, but I wouldn't bet on it.

Not quite, for she can be very unpredictable as a woman. From what I have gathered, it will not be BUSH OR CLINTON for many obvious reasons, people might start to wake-up from the DREAM!

Pay careful attention to someone presently ignored by the new media.
 
Not quite, for she can be very unpredictable as a woman. From what I have gathered, it will not be BUSH OR CLINTON for many obvious reasons, people might start to wake-up from the DREAM!

Pay careful attention to someone presently ignored by the new media.

Bernie Sanders? He's pretty much the Ron Paul of the left. Ostensibly honest guy with a consistent track record.

And a shameless socialist.

But he is popular with young, white liberals (many of whom don't trust Hillary).

Also, people ARE waking up. I haven't seen this much general skepticism towards the political class in my entire life. I think a deeply cynical outlook on politics is the most unifying, non-partisan position there is right now.
 
You're an AnCap against open immigration? Seriously? How do you expect to keep brown people out when the only borders that exist are those put in place by a handful of property owners in a few random locations?

Here's Hans-Hermann Hoppe on open immigration and forced integration:

All land is privately owned, including all streets, rivers, airports, harbors, etc. With respect to some pieces of land, the property title may be unrestricted; that is, the owner is permitted to do with his property whatever he pleases as long as he does not physically damage the property owned by others. With respect to other territories, the property title may be more or less severely restricted. As is currently the case in some housing developments, the owner may be bound by contractual limitations on what he can do with his property (voluntary zoning), which might include residential vs. commercial use, no buildings more than four stories high, no sale or rent to Jews, Germans, Catholics, homosexuals, Haitians, families with or without children, or smokers, for example.

Clearly, under this scenario there exists no such thing as freedom of immigration. Rather, there exists the freedom of many independent private property owners to admit or exclude others from their own property in accordance with their own unrestricted or restricted property titles. Admission to some territories might be easy, while to others it might be nearly impossible. In any case, however, admission to the property of the admitting person does not imply a “freedom to move around,” unless other property owners consent to such movements. There will be as much immigration or non-immigration, inclusivity or exclusivity, desegregation or segregation, non-discrimination or discrimination based on racial, ethnic, linguistic, religious, cultural or whatever other grounds as individual owners or associations of individual owners allow.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/1970/01/hans-hermann-hoppe/on-free-immigration-and-forced-integration/
 
In the latest Washington Post poll, Trump came out way ahead with 24%. The next highest are Scott Walker at 13% and Jeb Boosh at 12%.

Back in May, Trump was polling at 4%. Now's he's at 24%. He's on fire. And his campaign just got started!!! Just wait until the first debate in a couple weeks. Trump will slaughter the establishment Repubics and jump in the polls even further.

Poll: Trump surges to big lead in GOP presidential race - The Washington Post
 
In the latest Washington Post poll, Trump came out way ahead with 24%. The next highest are Scott Walker at 13% and Jeb Boosh at 12%.

Back in May, Trump was polling at 4%. Now's he's at 24%. He's on fire. And his campaign just got started!!! Just wait until the first debate in a couple weeks. Trump will slaughter the establishment Repubics and jump in the polls even further.

Poll: Trump surges to big lead in GOP presidential race - The Washington Post


It's too son to tell, but keep in mind the poll they are referencing was taken (in Iowa) over the 3 days the Iowa get-together was held. The 3rd day is when Trump went after McCain:

Support for Trump fell sharply on the one night that voters were surveyed following those comments. Telephone interviewing for the poll began Thursday, and most calls were completed before the news about the remarks was widely reported.


Although the sample size for the final day was small, the decline was statistically significant. Still, it is difficult to predict what could happen to Trump’s support in the coming days and weeks as the controversy plays out.
By the end of this week, we will see if it had any effect nationwide.


Watch New Hampshire polls- if Trump loses support there, he will likely drop out of the race before the end of the year.
 
Poor baby. Let me call the wambulance. I didn't respond to your post because you're an idiot. Perhaps if you made a point instead of hurling stupid insults I'd take the time to respond to it.

Amen. There are a few of these kind of members on WF.

When they start calling retard or other derogatory terms at you, you know they don't have a firm foundation to build their argument on.

No one needs to hurl insults unless their positions are weak and so attempt to compensate with ad hominem abusive.

When this happens I usually don't waste anymore of my time to respond to them. And as usual, their ego misleads them to believe they have tacitly won the argument.