Trump for US President?

Trump has no real campaign presence outside of NH while other candidates have been setting up shop around the country. His poll numbers are being driven directly from media coverage, but if you look at the full poll data, he usually performs worst against Hillary, is not considered a serious candidate by large margins and has the highest unfavorables of all the candidates.

What this means is once the press move on to the next hot topic, he will have to go out to the early states, do small venues with the local GOPs, shake hands with the commoners like everyone else to keep poling well and for those poll numbers to translate into actual votes. And on primary day, he needs people to go door knocking to get voters to the polls, but most importantly, he needs to know where to go. That doesn't happen if he doesn't have offices set up in the state well in advance.
 


Look at all the thousandaires complaining about a successful Wharton School graduate billionaire. Failures!

Trump 2016!

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74TFS8r_SMI[/ame]
 
Look at all the thousandaires complaining about a successful Wharton School graduate billionaire. Failures!

Trump 2016!

Successful businessman and leader of the free world are two fairly different job descriptions. I'd prefer Mark Cuban didn't end up in the Whitehouse either.

I'm assuming you're just trolling, because you can't possibly be in favor of Trump. Yeah, let's give that guy the launch codes, and control of the US military, and see how that works out.
 
No question, the GOP will win the 2016 election. Democrats had it for 8 years, and now the pendulum swings, and it's the Republicans turn. Just the way these things go.

Trump appears to be leading the polls in the Republican race. Seriously, if you Americans vote Trump in for President, you're officially retarded.


I am more worried about your dogs than Donald Trump.
 
Yeah, let's give that guy the launch codes, and control of the US military, and see how that works out.

"There’s nobody bigger or better at the military than I am."
- Donald Trump

[26 second mark]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJkaLFGFSgE[/ame]
 
No question, the GOP will win the 2016 election. Democrats had it for 8 years, and now the pendulum swings, and it's the Republicans turn. Just the way these things go.

That's not really true. Just the way the electoral college is setup, Democrats have a strong structural edge over Republicans. It's certainly possible for Republicans to win, but they have an uphill battle just by virtue of how each state leans politically.
 
As soon as you dumbfucks realize it doesn't matter who gets elected, you will be better off!

I used to think that, but nope, I'm pretty certain who lives in the White House actually does matter.

You had 8 years of Bush, and are closing on 8 years of Obama. Look at the periods, and the trajectory the US took during those times. Yep, I'd say the President does actually matter.
 
That's not really true. Just the way the electoral college is setup, Democrats have a strong structural edge over Republicans. It's certainly possible for Republicans to win, but they have an uphill battle just by virtue of how each state leans politically.


This is why the last few cycles, there are like 2 or 3 states they campaign hard in, plus 3 or 4 more the GOP candidate campaigns in if they think it can be a toss-up. If the GOP lose any of their "safe" states, they are fucked.
 
Trump is a sideshow at this point, he is loud and obnoxious. days after Rand introduced a 14.5% flat tax he came out with his loud remarks.

He is just there to draw attention away from the other gras roots candidate.s That said he is doing a good job bringing up real issues. I appreciate that.

Time will tell.
 
I used to think that, but nope, I'm pretty certain who lives in the White House actually does matter.

You had 8 years of Bush, and are closing on 8 years of Obama. Look at the periods, and the trajectory the US took during those times. Yep, I'd say the President does actually matter.

You realize the U.S. has gone to shit during both presidential periods, right?

Republican or Democrat. Both equally likely to fuck up the country.
 
MattKiopa

you keep referencing the U.S. as the largest arsenal in the world when in fact its Russia

I guess you say this for impact
 
He's currently leading the polls.

Then I'm assuming Hilary will get the Democrat nomination, and she's a complete nut case herself, so I can't see her getting voted in.

Then due to the massive amount of hatred for Obama, I'm assuming the pendulum will swing, and you guys will go for a Republican President this time around.

Time will tell I guess.

kiopa matt advanced analytics strikes again
 
I used to think that, but nope, I'm pretty certain who lives in the White House actually does matter.

You had 8 years of Bush, and are closing on 8 years of Obama. Look at the periods, and the trajectory the US took during those times. Yep, I'd say the President does actually matter.

You realize the U.S. has gone to shit during both presidential periods, right?

Republican or Democrat. Both equally likely to fuck up the country.


Exactly! When the system is broken it makes no difference which side wins.

The US is on a downward trajectory, and whomever is sitting in the Whitehouse isn't going to change that. It happens to all of the "Greatest Country in the World" at one time or another throughout history.

We had our time in the sun and it will soon be over.
 
MattKiopa

you keep referencing the U.S. as the largest arsenal in the world when in fact its Russia

I guess you say this for impact

Do you know how Russians count their nukes? They count everything they have.

They still have Topol's and Iskanders, not to mention Satana - 40, 30 and 20-years-old missiles respectively. Effective service period for Soviet nukes is 10 years, then nuclear charge loses stability and should be replaced with new one, while old one serves as fuel for Russian nuclear stations. The last plutonium-processing plant in Russia was closed back in 2002, because they had no money to upgrade it. Therefore, since 2012 there are NO STRIKE-READY NUKES IN RUSSIA.

In case Putin presses the red button he will launch empty tubes. They can be filled with toxins, bacteries or mines - but not with nukes.

And just to make you laugh a bit more... Military should test their weponry regularly, right? Russians also test their nukes, by launching them to strike the practice target while evading their anti-missile-defense systems, so that both nuclear fore and nuclear defense force get a training. I know the results of these tests for the last 6 years... and they are unbelievable....

Nearly 9 of 10 missiles DON'T EVEN FLY WHERE THEY HAVE TO. 2/10 fail to start, 4/10 explode in flight and 3/10 fly IN WRONG DIRECTION. Only 1/10 is able to hit the target and is easily intercepted by their anti-nuke defense forces.

This simple statistics effectively cuts RUssian nuke force to 1 000 missiles against 9 000 the US currently fields.

And to finish - Soviet union made details for their weaponry all over the union. Tank hulls and engines were made in Kharkiv, turrets and barrels at Yekaterinburg, missile hulls at Dnepropetrovsk, missile control units in Kharkiv, aircraft hulls in Kiev, aircraft engines in Zaporozhye. Do you get what I say? RUSSIA RECEIVED 40-70% OF MISSILE COMPONENTS FROM UKRAINE.

Till 2014. Till the Crimea annexation. Tillthe war in Donbass. Now they receive only a big bag of dicks from Ukraine. What the results are? You can review the results of their space program for the last year.

18th of May - launch of Proton, explosion after a minute of flight, secret satellite falling in China and Xi JingPing fucking mr. Putin to the face and to the ass for a permission to take it back.

August launch - explosion in flight

November launch on Canaverol of Russian-Ukrainian-American complex - explosion on start, during the ignition of Russian module.

Launch this May, postponed 3 times - and they lost the Progress ship with food for the astronauts and their Victory banner... Oh my fucking God, that banner was sacred for the nation and they burned it down because their space industry is in shit now...

To add some more - they tried to replace Ukrainian components with their own. Result - Angara, 100% Russian missile could not ignite for 3 times!!!! 3 times, Carl!!! And then it exploded in flight...

Here is another footage of Russian missile launch. I think all of you have seen it, but if somebody did not - here you go.

Russia has 10 000 missiles. 0 of them are nukes but can carry other weaponry. 9/10 will not even fly where they should with a risk of unleashing toxins and bacteria over Russian soil. The rest 1000 will be shot down with anti-nuke defense long before reaching US coasts.

Do you still really believe that Russia has the biggest nuclear arsenal? phew...

Why do politicians say otherwise? Because they want you to believe that only their efforts stop Putin from pressing the red button.

As for Trump - I watched the video above - I really cannot take this clown seriously. As for election results - time will tell. I hope Americans have brains.
 
About ICBM statistics

I'll provide prooflinks once I find them, I read the article long ago and can't recall it right now.

As for failed Russian launches - they were in 2014, you can find links yourself if you wish.

Therefore, when somebody says Russia is strong because it has 10,000 nukes...

Don't make my slippers smile, as Ukrainians say.
 
Successful businessman and leader of the free world are two fairly different job descriptions...

I think the US needs to learn how to make money instead of piling up debt so Trump looks like the best fit rather than a bunch over paid politicians.

The only reason I care is because most of the offices we work with are south of the border to us and pay in US funds.

You guys need another Bill Clinton, your dollar was very strong back then... and the BJ jokes with Monica were a hoot too... The good old days, online pharmacies, strong US dollar...

monicas_x_35_button.jpg
JC5.gif
 
It is time again for the charade to begin. The president has already been selected in a cloaked room, what remains is how to cleverly sell the "MOTHERFUCKER" to the rest of us.

After helping to elect Obama, I soon discovered politicians are carefully selected by hidden hands. Now you know why they say one thing , and do another.

I doubt if they would give us Clinton, Bush or Trump, all have too many flaws and false flag assets.

Look towards the unknown candidate like Scott Walker, Marco Rubio to carry the mantle.

Democrats are making a big mistake if they select Hilary as the nominee. I am sure Bill Clinton has strayed with other women, watch for the Republicans to simply parade them with dirty details.

Don't waste your time, for the policies to be implemented has already been determined, and the selected sheep must eagerly comply.