Trump for US President?
- Thread starter Kiopa_Matt
- Start date
Well, whether or not you like Trump or want him to win, you can't deny that he can be pretty, 'funny' sometimes. Trumpism, all the way!
The point I was trying to make is that (((Soros & co))) will try to stir shit up before the repub convention. Hence the OJ documentaries. Notice the nationwide riots over the weekend?
And yeah I'm a "conspiracy theorist" and a contrarian. So fucking what. I'm right about the fact that the blacks are deliberately being riled up. Obvious, no?
Simpson being potentially innocent is a tangent, yes, but if you look into it - which you did not do - there's a strong case for the son being the culprit. Which admittedly doesn't fucking matter in the scheme of things. Desperate enough for you?
The USA is being subverted, maybe you've noticed...
The powers that be are desperate as fuck to deny Trump the nomination.
Looks like Trump is slightly ahead of Hillary now in the polls. As much as I don't like Trump, I do concede that I like Hillary even less.
If the polls you mention are like past polls, Trump's margin is much wider. Pollsters have been purposefully weighting the polls with a higher percentage of Democrats than exist in the population to skew the numbers.
Trump will win and will be a landslide. There's going to be so much winning that you may even consider becoming a US citizen again.
He's not going to win. He doesn't have the Latino or African American vote, which makes up a huge demographic. More importantly, he doesn't loses heavily with Women. I still believe it's going to come down to one of the swing states. Most likely Florida, or Ohio.
The fact that this guy is even a candidate shows what a clown show our political system has become. It also shows how retarded the general public is.
Also, I don't know why no one is really talking about Gary Johnson? Guy is legit.
Yeah exactly. He's way better than Trump, and a lot of unhappy Republicans will be voting for him.
Unless Trump decides to eliminate income and dividend taxes or at least change the tax system in the US from worldwide taxation to territorial taxation, that's not going to happen.
Besides he would need congress to cooperate with such a radical change which is unlikely.Even if Trump were to win, you guys are going to be just as disappointed as Obama supporters who were sold on "hope".
He doesn't need the Latino/black vote to win. He just needs to get a slightly larger share of whites to win. Also, since Hillary didn't chose a black/Latino candidate that's going to hurt her turnout. That fact that some people are against him so how retarded they are.
I'll be back here in November just like I was after I predicted Trump would get the nomination when many thought I was insane.
Johnson is a joke. Two statists on the Libtard ticket. The LP has really come a long way since the days of Rothbard and Ron Paul! Johnson thinks Trump is Hitler for wanting to stop illegal immigration. I guess he has enough money to shield himself from the affects of illegal immigration, i.e., litter, crime, graffiti, welfare dependency, bad/dangerous schools, ruined neighborhoods, higher taxes, low IQ's, etc.
This is just the start:
Election Update: Trump Gets Convention Bounce, Drawing Polls To Dead Heat | FiveThirtyEight
Election Update: Trump Gets Convention Bounce, Drawing Polls To Dead Heat | FiveThirtyEight
I think their is more black and Latino support than the polls show. Women as well.
I liked Austin Peterson better as the libertarian candidate. He's way more legit than Johnson.
So aside from immigration, what kind of benefits can Trump give towards business, particularly on the e-commerce and tech side?
Aside from Peter Thiel, the tech titans seem to be very skeptical of a Trump presidency. They don't like the fact that Trump may potentially restrict H-1B1 and H-1B visas which the tech firms use to hire high quality well educated foreign workers are reasonable wages.
I view economic matters like reasonable wages for high quality workers as far more important than I do restricting immigration.
On the other hand immigration restrictions would be far more palatable if a Trump administration cut or eliminated corporate income taxes, eliminated capital gains, and dividend taxes. You'd see all sorts of businesses backing Trump then.
So what does Trump have to offer? I work with US citizens who normally vote Republican that reside in swing states. They plan on voting Libertarian this time around. Please tell me something that would sell a Trump presidency to them that doesn't involve knuckle dragging rhetoric about rights for whites and how many immigrants have low IQs (the ones working for Google on H-1B visas are probably smarter than most white nationalists posting on here).
Also accusing a Libertarian who doesn't want to seal up the borders as statist is ridiculous. So it's not statist to beef up USCIS and Homeland Security?
Aside from Peter Thiel, the tech titans seem to be very skeptical of a Trump presidency. They don't like the fact that Trump may potentially restrict H-1B1 and H-1B visas which the tech firms use to hire high quality well educated foreign workers are reasonable wages.
I view economic matters like reasonable wages for high quality workers as far more important than I do restricting immigration.
On the other hand immigration restrictions would be far more palatable if a Trump administration cut or eliminated corporate income taxes, eliminated capital gains, and dividend taxes. You'd see all sorts of businesses backing Trump then.
So what does Trump have to offer? I work with US citizens who normally vote Republican that reside in swing states. They plan on voting Libertarian this time around. Please tell me something that would sell a Trump presidency to them that doesn't involve knuckle dragging rhetoric about rights for whites and how many immigrants have low IQs (the ones working for Google on H-1B visas are probably smarter than most white nationalists posting on here).
Also accusing a Libertarian who doesn't want to seal up the borders as statist is ridiculous. So it's not statist to beef up USCIS and Homeland Security?
Correction: They don't like the fact that Trump may potentially restrict H-1B1 and H-1B visas which the tech firms use to hire high quality well educated foreign workers AT reasonable wages.
H1-B visas are largely a racket that US companies use to get foreign workers at below market rates. They're effectively indentured servants because if they quit they have to leave the country. There is not a shortage of high skilled tech workers in the US. Sure, there may be a shortage for tech companies that want to charge below market rates, but that's how economics works.
Here's a video about how the scam works to put US programmers out of jobs:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCbFEgFajGU[/ame]
More info: The Programmers Guild
An article by InfoWorld on the scam:
The fix is in: Proof that H-1B visa abuse is rampant | InfoWorld
BTW, the average IQ of the Mexicans coming illegally into the US is around 90, which is 10 points below the white average. The IQ's among the alt-right movement is definitely higher than most libtards, especially those that post on this forum.
Here's a video about how the scam works to put US programmers out of jobs:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCbFEgFajGU[/ame]
More info: The Programmers Guild
An article by InfoWorld on the scam:
The fix is in: Proof that H-1B visa abuse is rampant | InfoWorld
BTW, the average IQ of the Mexicans coming illegally into the US is around 90, which is 10 points below the white average. The IQ's among the alt-right movement is definitely higher than most libtards, especially those that post on this forum.
The median salary of H1-B workers is about $64,000. That is far more than many foreign workers can earn in their home country. They're not indentured servants just because they have to leave the country if they quit. This is a NORMAL practice for all foreign workers worldwide including in Hong Kong. Have you ever even tried to obtain residency in a foreign country before?
Even I had to face such restrictions during the first 7 years of my residency in Hong Kong. Under the Investment Visa I was granted, I was forbidden to take up any employment. I was only allowed to work for my own business. Likewise the same applies to HK Work Visas. You are only allowed to work for the employer who went through the trouble to sponsor you in the first place.
This restriction only applies to the first seven years, and after that you can gain permanent residency with right of abode and work for any employer in HK you wish.
H1-B visas also give workers the opportunity to apply for a green card (permanent residency) and eventually US citizenship if they so choose.
If H1-B visas were unpopular for foreign workers, then they wouldn't be coming to the US. Let's face it you're not interested in whether or not they're "indentured servants" (they're not), you're just a bitter queen about it because these cost effective workers are competing with American workers. But anyone who is a businessman first doesn't really care about that.
Why don't you stop your "whites first" rhetoric and tell me what kind of economic and tax benefits can businesses enjoy under a Trump presidency?
Did you even watch the short video? I don't really care about the indentured servitude nature of H1B visas. I care about Americans losing their jobs. I believe in putting America and Americans first.
I didn't mention anything about "whites first." Then again, why should it matter? Do you think that the Japanese, Indians, or Chinese don't put themselves first in their countries? As you mentioned, even Hong Kong puts Hong Kongers first. The US was created by whites and for whites. In fact, the first immigration law, I believe in 1790, restricted immigration to whites. There were subsequent laws to keep out Chinese, etc.
Low IQ people of any race should not be allowed in the US. It just so happens that Mexicans have an average IQ of 90. I won't even mention the average IQ of Africans lest I give you an aneurysm.
Here's Trump's tax proposal. It's been around for months.
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/tax-reform
And his healthcare reform:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/healthcare-reform
I didn't mention anything about "whites first." Then again, why should it matter? Do you think that the Japanese, Indians, or Chinese don't put themselves first in their countries? As you mentioned, even Hong Kong puts Hong Kongers first. The US was created by whites and for whites. In fact, the first immigration law, I believe in 1790, restricted immigration to whites. There were subsequent laws to keep out Chinese, etc.
Low IQ people of any race should not be allowed in the US. It just so happens that Mexicans have an average IQ of 90. I won't even mention the average IQ of Africans lest I give you an aneurysm.
Here's Trump's tax proposal. It's been around for months.
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/tax-reform
And his healthcare reform:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/healthcare-reform