To Anybody That Thinks 9/11 was a Conspiracy

Yuckystuff said:
Too many loose ends.

leaving even more loose ends.
Click to expand...

You say loose ends, I say potential loose ends perhaps, but certainly not prohibitively large amounts of them. I say they're just variables in the conspirators' equation.

Speculation on my part but i think the reason there have been fewer bodies than one might anticipate is because 9/11 is so obvious that they don't think they have room to start offing people.

there are inconsistencies from Ted Olson on his various (and contradictory accounts of the phone calls he received from his wife, and as a high ranking government officials, I'm not willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...
yeah and he's more than just a high ranking gubmint type. He's as crooked as the day is long.


slayerment said:
a stupid government is an argument in favor of 9/11.
Click to expand...

yup.

Ron Paul holds back on a lot of things.
Click to expand...
He called for a new investigation circa 2005/2006ish and said he would support one if elected.
 


AllBizNiz said:
On impact it blew most of the fire protection right off the steel. Many people have corroborated their stories with all the noises they heard while being in the towers before they collapsed. There are many people who heard the creaking and shaking. The steel heated up and eventually buckled and collapsed on each other.
Click to expand...

you do realize that even NIST abandoned this theory, right? pancaking implies resistance (as does a BUILDING) and there is no way it would have fallen that fast if each floor collapsed individually.
 
this latest documentary is pretty fucking interesting. you won't find independent architects and engineers putting their reps on the line for any of the official stories like this:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jixU7JG4pg]9/11: Explosive Evidence -- Experts Speak Out (Full) - YouTube[/ame]
 
lukep said:
It could have been Cheney or some other member of the legislative branch that had the power to move certain assets on that day. Bush just seems the most likely to me because of his very questionable history.
Click to expand...

Cheney was a member of PNAC, Bush was not. Cheney was a director for the Council on Foreign Relations, and was CEO at Halliburton. Cheney was in the emergency operations bunker giving orders to NORAD on 9/11.
 
Moxie said:
Cheney was a member of PNAC, Bush was not. Cheney was a director for the Council on Foreign Relations, and was CEO at Halliburton. Cheney was in the emergency operations bunker giving orders to NORAD on 9/11.
Click to expand...

And Bush was reading picture books, as far away as possible from screwing anything up. Even though he still managed to do that.

Interestingly one of the most important events of the day was the threat that came in to the White House that said 'Angel is next.'

Angel being code for air force 1, this can be interpreted as the secret government speaking directly to the president at that point and essentially saying, we can do away with you right now, you will do what we tell you or we will liquidate you and Cheney will give us what we want.
 
MSTeacher said:
Interestingly one of the most important events of the day was the threat that came in to the White House that said 'Angel is next.'
Click to expand...
Not that I doubt Cheney was a dirty old codger who probably pressed the button himself to demolish those buildings... But this sounds a little... Manufactured.

Since when are threats that were sent successfully to the whitehouse made a matter of public record? Does the Secret Service just think it's ok just this once to allow that note to slip? :/
 
lukep said:
The more I hear about 911, the more it sounds like the twin towers were ONLY taken down as a distraction. The Pentagon and WTC7 (which could have been the real target of the 4th plane perhaps?) were the real targets.
Click to expand...


that was one helluva distraction.
 
lukep said:
Since when are threats that were sent successfully to the whitehouse made a matter of public record? Does the Secret Service just think it's ok just this once to allow that note to slip? :/
Click to expand...

I don't know. I think Condi (NSA at the time I think) let this one out.

Could be it was aired to magnify the perceived weight of the threat in the eyes of its intended targets.

If it was the secret service who released it then I really wouldn't be surprised. I think they were the ones who let it slip that Jeff Gannon was sleeping over at the White House after it was discovered that he was a gay prostitute posing as a reporter in the press corps.

Damn, crazy days with W. So much more exciting than this current douche occupying space in the oval office.

bush_kisses_gannon1.jpg
w_hugs_gannon1.jpg
 
You and the others need to educate yourselves and not get brainwashed by the media. Yes, the media, news corps are owned by the same asswipes. Heard of the illuminati? Not weird people with 8 fingers or something, just really cunning and clever people who are greedy for power and money.

Conspiracy theories are really facts. It just is called theories because you never see media talking about those stories do you?

Anyone who still thinks the govt is so innocent, let me say, you are brainwashed beyond belief. WAKE THE FK UP. Go LEARN of the TRUTH.

DON'T BE A MEDIA SPONGE

leadsupplier said:
i don't get the conspiracy behind WTC 7?

what would be any motivation to blow it up? If terrorists blew that shit up with some crazy oceans 11/fight club plan then so be it ... but a conspiracy that the government did it doens't make sense to me.

Why would they do that?
Click to expand...
 
Watch the bbc documentary that came out a week ago that takes 5 conspiracy theorists and challenges their views. They present their best evidence and they do various scientific experiments to disprove facts. Most of what i've read on the first page of this thread can be disproven by what was on that video. I recommend it whatever side you are on.
 
sixthcutuan said:
Watch the bbc documentary that came out a week ago that takes 5 conspiracy theorists and challenges their views. They present their best evidence and they do various scientific experiments to disprove facts. Most of what i've read on the first page of this thread can be disproven by what was on that video. I recommend it whatever side you are on.
Click to expand...

Hopefully its better than the pile of shit History Channel put out
 
sixthcutuan said:
Watch the bbc documentary that came out a week ago that takes 5 conspiracy theorists and challenges their views. They present their best evidence and they do various scientific experiments to disprove facts. Most of what i've read on the first page of this thread can be disproven by what was on that video. I recommend it whatever side you are on.
Click to expand...

After a big event like 9/11 there's always many conspiracy theories flying around..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom