I dont see why "who posted what information first" makes anyone in this thread a better man.
Igl00 and CCarter, both of you arguing in this thread is pathetic. Who gives a shit who posted what first?
BTW, the info is something neither of you invented or made up. People cloaking Google, Facebook, eBay bots, Amazon bots, etc have been doing this mainstream since like 2005 at least. one look in phpbay pro forums can provide dates years ahead of stuff like this. You guys just applied a few extra bots to it, Ahrefs and Majestic, etc.
I am not knocking your sharing of this info, but claiming who did this first is stupid considering this has been info available to the right webmasters for years now.
All I see is 2 people wasting time on figuring out who did what, instead of stacking more dollars.
Also, just using robots.txt is peasant anyways. You should have more then this if you wanna block bots. How about a hidden img link in your text that only a bot would find that is really a PHP script with just a .jpg extension? Snatch the useragent and IP and there you go...
You should look at the chain of events before calling me pathetic. I declined to waste my time in the first thread, Until igl00 bumped a thread over a month ago. Then him and jeff were going at it, for a whole day. In the spirit of not giving a fuck, i was pulled in, so i gave my quick account events. I assumed that shit was done, then this clown goes and makes this thread. Again i dont give a fuck about this shit, but apparently igl00 does, again over a month later. So he makes a thread baiting me with my name versus his name. Look at my fuck responses. Actually look at who is talking to who. Its this peasant arguing about some old shit all over the forums and bumping old threads, I'm sitting looking, what the fuck is this dumb waste of time. I gave two responses, the first cause he was calling jeff a liar, so just to clarify what happened, told you guys to be the judge of it, and never responded to anything else. Then 2nd is the EXACT FUCKING QUOTE copied and pasted of the first response from the thread the argument was originally in. You think i want to be in a pissing contest with this peasant. I dont response to clowns like this, but a direct call out, with my name in the thread.
Before you, eliquid or anyone fucking else tells me not to argue, look at the fucking conversations. This is my 3rd TOTAL RESPONSE to this dumbshit, and i only response to some calling me pathetic when you clearly didn't actually look at the post chain of events. It's just igl00 acting like a crazy person in the village square.
You also made an assumption that I stated/claimed I was the originator of this shit, which really pisses me off. Never did I stated I originated this, igl00 did, cause his is trying t baite into a retarded argument. But again, you actually didn't take the time to look at who is arguing with who. Igl00 is arguing with no one. The only reason i responded the first time was because he was in SGW chat having retarded a long fights with Jeff about this shit, and it spilled over in the forum back and forth. The 2nd time, I just copied and pasted. If I gave a fuck about this argument, would i have copied and pasted my last response? Would i have been baffled by the reason to created this thread?
All you see are two people wasting time arguing, instead of stacking money? Do you need fucking glasses? Am I not the one that said this was a No Money Meeting?
F*** Y** eliquid, you jumped to conclusions without know anything or even reading the chain of events. I still like you and we're cool, but dude, you clearly didn't see me not giving a fuck. I only responded cause my name was in the fucking thread title. I cannot not respond with its a "Ccarter vs peasant bla bla bla". I could careless about this igl00 peasant and his bullshit waste of time on this.
What's that quote "Never argue with a fool, cause people from a distance can't tell who is who."
The only reason I responded this time is because I respect your hustle.
This is my 3rd and final response on this matter.
Carry on...